Shah Sahaab

Shah Sahaab — CS2 Stats

DE76561198339733693[U:1:379467965]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

895Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
855Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,019 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 1 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,072 -254 1 May6 Jul · 21 days played
9,87511,653peak 11,6531 May6 Jul
12,054Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,019Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2025-05-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,019
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.2%43.8%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy9.3%12.0%12.4%3.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.021.040.15 short
Match win rate41.6%44.7%45.3%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShah SahaabFACEITLevel 5 · 1,019 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,019csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning45
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45541Last 10045%Win rateLLLWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 686ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time680ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 677ms → last ⅓ avg 680ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 25 May
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 25 May
445msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · mirage, 19 Jan
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 17 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17infernoWeakest map · 8% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B23111248%-0.00
ancientS1712571%0.01
anubisB178947%0.01
nukeC125742%0.01
infernoD121118%-0.02
mirageC104640%-0.01
train42250%-0.01
cache21150%-0.03
overpass21150%0.01
grail1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,176Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
2,148Matches
41.6%Match win rate
45.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9.3%Shot accuracy
3,313MVPs
855Hours (in match)
1,779Bombs planted
551Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,818dust2
3,455inferno
2,494nuke
397vertigo
212train
31office
7lake
6sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

472Matches
49%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
73.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno9441%0.9413.8
Anubis8753%0.9815.1
Ancient7947%0.9214.4
Dust27854%1.0514.7
Mirage5149%1.0414.0
Nuke4149%1.0415.1
Overpass1953%0.9914.0
Cache1856%0.9813.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
686msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.35HE damage / grenade
10.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8941% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–130.0823%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0114%23 Aug
cache6–13-0.0827%24 Jul
cache16–140.0112%17 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0122%6 Jul
dust213–60.0226%22 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0216%20 Jun
inferno13–10.0111%17 Jun
ancient13–100.0027%9 Jun
dust213–3-0.0718%4 Jun
mirage13–110.0518%3 Jun
dust216–140.0914%29 May
mirage13–30.0512%20 May
ancient13–30.0319%6 May
anubis13–110.0016%22 Apr
anubis6–130.0119%4 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0216%19 Mar
anubis9–13-0.018%8 Mar
ancient13–100.0515%2 Mar
dust26–13-0.0515%2 Mar
dust26–13-0.0721%25 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0614%15 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0717%8 Feb
dust20–13-0.0817%28 Jan
ancient7–130.018%22 Jan
mirage13–70.0210%22 Jan
anubis2–7-0.0919%22 Jan
nuke9–130.0119%19 Jan
overpass5–130.0214%19 Jan
mirage0–4-0.110%19 Jan
mirage10–130.0420%19 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0515%19 Jan
train13–80.0214%28 May
train10–13-0.0512%28 May
anubis6–130.0221%28 May
ancient13–7-0.0325%28 May
nuke11–13-0.029%28 May
ancient16–130.0211%28 May
anubis9–13-0.037%27 May
dust29–13-0.0125%27 May
nuke13–11-0.0215%27 May
anubis9–13-0.056%27 May
ancient16–140.107%26 May
mirage13–16-0.0616%26 May
dust213–30.0411%26 May
ancient13–9-0.008%26 May
inferno8–13-0.0510%26 May
dust213–6-0.0310%26 May
nuke10–130.0612%25 May
dust213–110.0412%25 May
dust213–40.1030%25 May
nuke5–13-0.0117%25 May
inferno9–13-0.0312%24 May
dust29–13-0.0123%24 May
dust27–130.0422%23 May
mirage8–13-0.0512%23 May
inferno8–130.0422%23 May
anubis9–130.059%23 May
ancient13–70.0512%23 May
dust213–110.0120%22 May
anubis2–13-0.0819%22 May
anubis13–110.0110%18 May
train14–16-0.0016%18 May
inferno11–130.0214%16 May
anubis13–80.0613%16 May
ancient16–140.0110%16 May
dust216–12-0.0012%15 May
nuke13–70.0420%15 May
inferno11–13-0.0115%15 May
nuke13–50.0216%15 May
ancient13–50.054%15 May
dust214–16-0.0321%15 May
mirage13–60.0413%15 May
anubis13–90.087%12 May
train13–70.0118%12 May
inferno7–13-0.0313%12 May
ancient11–130.0116%12 May
nuke13–90.0020%11 May
anubis16–140.0312%11 May
mirage9–13-0.047%10 May
dust210–130.0311%10 May
nuke16–140.017%10 May
grail12–12-0.0110%10 May
ancient9–13-0.045%9 May
inferno6–13-0.0321%9 May
dust213–80.0117%5 May
ancient11–13-0.0118%4 May
anubis13–40.0326%4 May
dust212–16-0.057%4 May
anubis13–80.0513%4 May
mirage10–13-0.0310%3 May
ancient16–14-0.0215%3 May
anubis13–60.0924%3 May
nuke6–13-0.0219%2 May
dust28–130.0316%2 May
inferno10–13-0.0516%2 May
dust214–16-0.048%2 May
dust213–70.0214%1 May
anubis9–130.0510%1 May
ancient13–1-0.007%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →