Aquast

Aquast — CS2 Stats

FI76561198336978178[U:1:376712450]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,135Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,085Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating22,700Top 25% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#44001 of 241105 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 29 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,700 +3,667 24 Apr18 Sept · 14 days played
18,58522,700peak 22,70024 Apr18 Sept
23,052Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-03-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,700
  • +42 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,878 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,300 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 19 Sep 2026 and 24 Sep 2026.

Measured 19 Sep 202624 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches9
Win rate56%
K/D1.14
Headshot %54%

Measured 30 Aug 202624 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate51.3%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy20.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.251.061.07above
Match win rate37.6%46.3%46.9%9.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAquastFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,700 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning58
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time513ms−106ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 27 Jun
67%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · boulder, 27 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 12 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2315865%0.02
dust2A22121055%0.03
infernoB178947%0.04
nukeA95456%0.03
cacheS86275%0.04
anubisA53260%0.06
ancientC52340%0.02
overpass4040%-0.02
train31233%0.01
boulder21150%0.07
fachwerk110100%0.03
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

326,540Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
16,404Matches
37.6%Match win rate
51.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
20.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
12,618MVPs
3,080Hours (in match)
3,149Bombs planted
1,228Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47150,615
AWP55,574
P2509,367
Knife4,092
SSG 083,944
AUG3,108

Lifetime map wins

9,448inferno
3,531train
2,474nuke
2,277dust2
1,329vertigo
600cbble
478office
404lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

131Matches
59%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
64.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient367%0.9411.7
Mirage250%0.9212.5
Thera10%1.4722.0
Anubis1100%0.7512.0
Nuke10%0.9416.0
Overpass1100%1.1813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
502msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
15.2%Flash assists
8.33HE damage / grenade
5.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4777% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0925%18 Sept
nuke13–70.0319%18 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0112%18 Sept
mirage13–80.0525%18 Sept
cache13–40.0433%18 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0716%11 Sept
dust211–130.0626%11 Sept
inferno13–110.0130%4 Sept
anubis8–130.0214%4 Sept
cache13–5-0.0415%28 Aug
mirage13–40.0423%28 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0125%28 Aug
dust210–130.0013%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0219%14 Aug
inferno13–70.0329%14 Aug
dust213–60.0224%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0321%7 Aug
cache11–130.0133%7 Aug
inferno15–150.1123%7 Aug
dust23–13-0.0621%29 Jul
ancient8–130.0130%29 Jul
dust213–6-0.0324%29 Jul
cache13–90.1426%29 Jul
dust213–50.0715%27 Jul
train3–13-0.0621%27 Jul
boulder3–00.0667%27 Jul
fachwerk13–80.0325%27 Jul
anubis13–30.1534%27 Jul
inferno13–70.0726%24 Jul
anubis5–130.0129%24 Jul
dust213–100.0317%24 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0319%23 Jul
mirage14–160.0120%23 Jul
ancient6–130.0312%23 Jul
dust213–70.0021%23 Jul
mirage13–10.0330%23 Jul
anubis13–90.0712%23 Jul
inferno13–110.1221%23 Jul
inferno8–130.0914%23 Jul
boulder12–120.0819%14 Jul
dust27–130.0414%14 Jul
ancient11–130.0118%14 Jul
mirage13–0-0.100%12 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0138%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0522%12 Jul
nuke4–130.0128%12 Jul
inferno15–150.0820%11 Jul
cache16–140.0226%11 Jul
dust25–13-0.0330%11 Jul
dust213–50.1131%11 Jul
dust23–13-0.0025%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0120%11 Jul
nuke13–80.0835%11 Jul
cache3–13-0.0421%11 Jul
dust213–8-0.0429%11 Jul
inferno6–1-0.060%3 Jul
dust22–13-0.0124%3 Jul
overpass10–13-0.0826%3 Jul
mirage13–50.1137%3 Jul
mirage10–130.0630%3 Jul
mirage13–60.1730%27 Jun
mirage13–70.0821%27 Jun
train13–100.0724%20 Jun
dust28–10.0661%20 Jun
inferno13–110.1227%18 Jun
cache13–30.1340%18 Jun
dust213–60.1626%18 Jun
nuke13–50.0725%5 Jun
ancient13–10.0332%30 May
mirage7–13-0.0127%30 May
inferno5–13-0.0235%30 May
cache13–110.0631%30 May
overpass7–13-0.0412%30 May
dust28–13-0.0317%29 May
nuke10–130.0129%28 May
overpass5–70.0350%22 May
inferno8–13-0.0213%22 May
ancient13–10.0022%22 May
inferno6–13-0.0424%22 May
anubis13–80.0322%8 May
vertigo12–120.0526%30 Apr
train10–130.0229%30 Apr
nuke9–130.0327%30 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0021%24 Apr
dust213–100.0229%24 Apr
mirage13–100.0415%24 Apr
dust213–50.0548%24 Apr
nuke13–80.0320%17 Apr
mirage13–30.0833%17 Apr
dust213–30.1423%17 Apr
mirage13–90.0228%17 Apr
nuke13–00.0632%10 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0032%10 Apr
mirage13–10.0123%10 Apr
overpass6–130.0135%10 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0420%4 Apr
inferno13–110.0425%4 Apr
dust212–12-0.0225%2 Apr
inferno13–60.1218%2 Apr
dust210–130.0416%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →