๐“ณ๐“ช๐“ถ๐“น๐”ƒ๐“ช๐“ชใ‚ธ

๐“ณ๐“ช๐“ถ๐“น๐”ƒ๐“ช๐“ชใ‚ธ โ€” CS2 Stats

FI76561198335993492[U:1:375727764]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

397Tracked matches70%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,694Hours in CS58Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,806Light Blue band ยท top ~60.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

โˆ’424Premier CS Rating ยท 9,230 โ†’ 8,806
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 13 days played since 6 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,806 +6,397 6 Sept โ€“ 23 Sept ยท 13 days played
1,6969,230peak 9,2306 Sept23 Sept
9,623Peak Premier in tracked matches
13Days played since 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 424 below peak (9,230)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 โ€” 1,194 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,407), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate46.7%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy3.0%11.3%12.0%9.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.770.991.020.25 short
Match win rate40.1%43.9%44.7%4.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐“ณ๐“ช๐“ถ๐“น๐”ƒ๐“ช๐“ชใ‚ธFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER8,806 ยท Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning73
Utility53

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62โ€“35โ€“3Last 10062%Win rateWWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.07 avg rating ยท โˆ’8.2pp headshot accuracy ยท +12ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“5 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 12โ€“8 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.3
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels6.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 73% CT opening-duel success โ€” winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 73% on CT to 48% on T โ€” the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped โ€” moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning7.3
Utility5.3
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.09+0.08
first โ…“ avg 0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.09
Reaction time472msโˆ’73ms
first โ…“ avg 545ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 472ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%+2.8%
first โ…“ avg 22.0% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.52Best match rating ยท 9โ€“0 ยท nuke, 17 Sept โ†’
59%Best headshot accuracy ยท 9โ€“3 ยท inferno, 6 Sept โ†’
289msFastest reaction time ยท 9โ€“2 ยท inferno, 6 Sept โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท anubis, 18 Sept โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

17Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6โ€“7In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map ยท 100% over 7mirageWeakest map ยท 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2819โ€“968%0.09
nukeB2010โ€“1050%0.08
anubisS1412โ€“286%0.11
mirageC135โ€“838%0.01
cacheC83โ€“538%0.03
dust2S77โ€“0100%0.09
ancientS64โ€“267%0.02
eldoradoโ€”21โ€“150%-0.10
overpassโ€”11โ€“0100%-0.04
poseidonโ€”10โ€“10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,886Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
2,069Matches
40.1%Match win rate
46.7%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Level 4 players
3.0%Shot accuracy
4,078MVPs
644Hours (in match)
1,659Bombs planted
333Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,930inferno
2,641nuke
1,245dust2
1,010vertigo
362train
98office
51italy
44cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
0%Win rate
0.12Avg K/D
โ€”ADR
12%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

โ€”1v1 clutch win
โ€”1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10%0.244.0
Nuke10%0.000.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
59.9%Counter-strafing
9.1ยฐPreaim
470msReaction time
48.1%T opening success
73.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
6.93HE damage / grenade
11.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy โ†’Mirage grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9โ€“4-0.024%23 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“3-0.0011%23 Sept โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0524%23 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“2-0.0219%22 Sept โ†’
anubis5โ€“130.0119%22 Sept โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0533%22 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“130.0618%22 Sept โ†’
mirage7โ€“130.0414%22 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.1110%22 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“20.0319%22 Sept โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0035%22 Sept โ†’
inferno16โ€“120.0939%22 Sept โ†’
nuke0โ€“13-0.0322%21 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.1524%21 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“40.2147%21 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“20.1916%21 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“00.2228%21 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“40.1928%21 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.079%21 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.035%21 Sept โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0511%21 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“10.3615%21 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“20.2950%21 Sept โ†’
inferno7โ€“90.2352%21 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“40.1328%18 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“10.2520%18 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“40.1540%18 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“100.1021%18 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.1433%18 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.1217%18 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“30.1032%18 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“100.0630%18 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“20.0943%18 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“6-0.0617%18 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0322%18 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0815%18 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“5-0.0211%18 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0219%18 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.057%18 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0517%18 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.1936%17 Sept โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0621%17 Sept โ†’
dust210โ€“20.1036%17 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.1722%17 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“100.2419%17 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.2336%17 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.2350%17 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“00.5233%17 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0255%17 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.2042%17 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“20.2734%17 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“20.2217%17 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“20.1225%17 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.1423%17 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“70.1429%17 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0443%17 Sept โ†’
mirage3โ€“10-0.080%17 Sept โ†’
ancient2โ€“80.088%17 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“10.1420%16 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“16-0.029%16 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“60.054%16 Sept โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0418%15 Sept โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0719%15 Sept โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0415%15 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.0716%14 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.0612%14 Sept โ†’
ancient7โ€“13-0.130%14 Sept โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0413%14 Sept โ†’
inferno0โ€“13-0.0332%14 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0210%14 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“9-0.0943%11 Sept โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0324%11 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“160.1023%9 Sept โ†’
cache15โ€“150.0623%9 Sept โ†’
cache14โ€“16-0.0020%8 Sept โ†’
mirage7โ€“130.0010%8 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.0313%8 Sept โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.088%8 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0514%8 Sept โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0310%8 Sept โ†’
nuke5โ€“13-0.0616%7 Sept โ†’
nuke15โ€“15-0.028%7 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“8-0.059%7 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“30.1116%7 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“30.0619%7 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0612%7 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“130.0311%7 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.1119%7 Sept โ†’
overpass9โ€“6-0.0420%7 Sept โ†’
eldorado5โ€“9-0.146%7 Sept โ†’
eldorado9โ€“7-0.076%7 Sept โ†’
inferno8โ€“8-0.0722%7 Sept โ†’
inferno4โ€“90.0256%7 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0746%6 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“40.1324%6 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“10.2322%6 Sept โ†’
poseidon7โ€“9-0.0231%6 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“30.1359%6 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“20.2550%6 Sept โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0232%6 Sept โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches17-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’