᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼

᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼ — CS2 Stats

76561198335977102[U:1:375711374]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

542Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼᲼FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning59
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61–31–8Last 10061%Win rateWWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.12
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility6.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.9
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.09+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg 0.09
Reaction time554ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.39Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 29 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–3 · anubis, 2 Oct →
297msFastest reaction time · 0–7 · inferno, 30 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2416–867%0.11
anubisB179–853%0.09
nukeC176–1135%0.10
infernoA1610–663%0.06
vertigoS97–278%0.10
dust2S97–278%0.06
ancientS54–180%0.11
mirage—22–0100%0.16
office—10–10%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
44.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.7%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
555msReaction time
52.1%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
20.1%Flash assists
18.69HE damage / grenade
7.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.2120%4 Nov →
inferno11–1-0.0131%4 Nov →
vertigo10–130.0228%4 Nov →
nuke13–60.1728%3 Nov →
cache13–90.1125%3 Nov →
nuke13–70.1326%3 Nov →
inferno13–20.139%2 Nov →
nuke11–130.1014%1 Nov →
nuke6–60.2318%1 Nov →
cache13–30.1433%1 Nov →
inferno0–7-0.0519%30 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0529%30 Oct →
dust213–60.1136%30 Oct →
dust24–130.0039%30 Oct →
nuke13–00.3924%29 Oct →
vertigo13–20.0925%29 Oct →
inferno5–130.0121%29 Oct →
mirage13–80.1826%29 Oct →
anubis13–00.1230%28 Oct →
cache6–130.1222%28 Oct →
mirage13–50.1520%28 Oct →
cache10–130.0123%28 Oct →
inferno13–40.0819%28 Oct →
cache13–70.1318%27 Oct →
anubis13–70.1222%27 Oct →
cache5–4-0.0038%27 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0030%27 Oct →
dust213–20.039%27 Oct →
dust213–40.0727%27 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0242%27 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0419%27 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0217%26 Oct →
cache13–30.2116%26 Oct →
cache13–100.1615%26 Oct →
cache13–40.1120%25 Oct →
nuke9–130.1120%25 Oct →
ancient12–120.1217%25 Oct →
anubis13–80.1124%25 Oct →
dust213–60.2031%25 Oct →
anubis13–60.2816%21 Oct →
nuke9–130.0523%21 Oct →
cache12–120.0735%21 Oct →
inferno13–60.1031%21 Oct →
cache13–60.2331%18 Oct →
inferno7–130.0515%18 Oct →
nuke13–60.1219%18 Oct →
inferno2–70.0422%17 Oct →
ancient13–100.0525%17 Oct →
cache13–70.1920%17 Oct →
nuke11–130.0616%17 Oct →
inferno13–60.0317%17 Oct →
anubis13–10.1027%17 Oct →
ancient13–60.1243%17 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0529%16 Oct →
inferno13–10.0942%16 Oct →
inferno13–60.1625%14 Oct →
cache13–60.1023%14 Oct →
nuke3–110.0829%13 Oct →
cache7–10.0524%13 Oct →
vertigo13–30.1118%13 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0221%13 Oct →
anubis12–120.1113%12 Oct →
inferno5–130.0526%12 Oct →
cache13–20.1045%12 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0316%12 Oct →
anubis7–130.1918%11 Oct →
cache13–90.2624%10 Oct →
nuke13–60.1517%10 Oct →
anubis12–120.1720%10 Oct →
cache13–80.1833%10 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0025%5 Oct →
inferno13–110.0916%5 Oct →
vertigo13–40.1426%5 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0014%4 Oct →
vertigo13–00.0940%4 Oct →
cache12–120.0923%4 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0629%3 Oct →
nuke5–130.1038%3 Oct →
cache13–10.1225%3 Oct →
anubis10–90.0825%3 Oct →
ancient13–20.0921%3 Oct →
nuke11–130.0522%2 Oct →
inferno13–80.1120%2 Oct →
cache8–130.0121%2 Oct →
anubis2–3-0.0367%2 Oct →
vertigo13–40.2239%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0921%1 Oct →
ancient13–60.1517%1 Oct →
anubis13–50.1423%30 Sept →
vertigo8–10.1343%30 Sept →
cache3–130.0542%30 Sept →
office12–120.1634%29 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0118%29 Sept →
cache13–60.1120%29 Sept →
anubis0–7-0.057%29 Sept →
dust213–60.0322%29 Sept →
nuke12–120.0927%29 Sept →
cache5–130.0526%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0724%28 Sept →
anubis11–130.0828%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.