nettik

nettik — CS2 Stats

PRO“bowl_fish”FlyQuestNew ZealandRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198332845251[U:1:372579523]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,207Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,923 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,923 → 3,923
+10Tracked matches · now 4,207
+7.8ppWin rate · 65.5% → 73.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,923 +0 28 Aug – 27 Sept · 12 observations
3,9233,923peak 3,92328 Aug27 Sept
3,923Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-04-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,923
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 77 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnettikFACEITLevel 10 · 3,923 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,923csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning58
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60–39–1Last 10060%Win rateWWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −6.3pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 394ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Last 20

  • 16–4 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 449ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility6.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time442ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 487ms → last ⅓ avg 442ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 8 Aug →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 7–5 · anubis, 2 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 27 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 10 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W8Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 15mirageWeakest map · 45% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2210–1245%0.04
dust2A2011–955%-0.00
infernoA1710–759%0.02
anubisS1511–473%-0.00
cacheS118–373%0.06
nukeA85–363%0.02
ancientS75–271%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 22). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,381Matches
68%Win rate
1.72Avg K/D
107.8ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
40Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage50662%1.6822.9
Dust234267%1.7822.2
Anubis18962%1.5321.0
Ancient9961%1.5421.1
Nuke8860%1.5320.7
Inferno7971%1.4719.4
Vertigo6769%1.8022.0
Train3551%1.2520.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.7%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
453msReaction time
43.2%T opening success
32.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
7.74HE damage / grenade
12.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.8113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0318%29 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0416%29 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0224%27 Sept →
ancient13–40.0113%27 Sept →
anubis13–80.0220%25 Sept →
nuke13–30.0922%25 Sept →
cache13–30.0423%23 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0311%23 Sept →
dust210–130.0022%16 Sept →
cache13–20.0927%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0425%13 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0124%10 Sept →
nuke13–00.0424%10 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0031%9 Sept →
cache13–10.1033%9 Sept →
cache13–80.1531%8 Sept →
dust216–15-0.0223%3 Sept →
inferno13–40.0419%3 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0922%3 Sept →
dust23–2-0.1325%3 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0038%3 Sept →
anubis13–60.0529%3 Sept →
cache13–50.0216%3 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0114%3 Sept →
dust20–1-0.020%2 Sept →
inferno10–130.0120%2 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0519%2 Sept →
dust26–12-0.0418%2 Sept →
inferno12–5-0.0332%2 Sept →
anubis3–4-0.0213%2 Sept →
inferno1–2-0.0442%2 Sept →
anubis3–3-0.0114%2 Sept →
anubis7–50.0645%2 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0017%18 Aug →
mirage6–130.1023%16 Aug →
mirage13–90.0021%14 Aug →
cache2–130.1431%14 Aug →
mirage19–160.0125%13 Aug →
mirage13–00.2024%8 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0113%7 Aug →
mirage10–130.0326%7 Aug →
mirage19–220.0625%5 Aug →
mirage13–110.0325%4 Aug →
mirage13–60.0518%2 Aug →
ancient13–60.0418%1 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0227%1 Aug →
mirage5–130.0531%31 Jul →
nuke5–130.0133%30 Jul →
dust213–80.0326%29 Jul →
inferno13–90.1116%28 Jul →
mirage15–190.0017%28 Jul →
inferno9–130.0729%27 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0310%17 Jul →
anubis13–60.0121%17 Jul →
inferno13–10.0818%17 Jul →
mirage13–100.0733%10 Jul →
cache13–60.0523%9 Jul →
cache13–20.0919%9 Jul →
mirage13–70.1433%9 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0613%8 Jul →
dust213–50.0324%7 Jul →
dust213–110.0521%7 Jul →
mirage16–130.0624%1 Jul →
mirage13–110.0117%1 Jul →
mirage7–130.0833%30 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0116%25 Jun →
mirage13–160.0322%14 Jun →
dust211–130.0629%14 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0516%7 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0219%7 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0230%6 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0029%6 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0418%5 Jun →
anubis13–2-0.0133%5 Jun →
inferno13–30.0728%4 Jun →
anubis13–100.0229%4 Jun →
mirage10–130.0119%3 Jun →
inferno11–130.0722%2 Jun →
ancient16–140.0314%2 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0519%13 May →
ancient13–16-0.0412%13 May →
dust213–70.0538%13 May →
anubis13–70.0519%12 May →
dust213–40.0828%12 May →
mirage11–130.0122%11 May →
nuke13–30.0631%11 May →
nuke13–110.0226%26 Apr →
cache13–160.0330%25 Apr →
mirage16–14-0.0121%25 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0218%25 Apr →
mirage11–130.0728%24 Apr →
inferno8–130.1628%20 Apr →
inferno13–100.1123%12 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0422%10 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0518%5 Apr →
anubis13–80.0514%5 Apr →
mirage2–13-0.0629%5 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0524%4 Apr →
nuke13–40.0624%4 Apr →
ancient16–13-0.0319%2 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.