Daddy Specter

Daddy Specter — CS2 Stats

DE76561198331824439[U:1:371558711]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,917Tracked matches41%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,308Blue band · top ~32.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,328 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,917 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,308 -2,114 15 Jul – 18 Sept · 29 days played
14,30818,531peak 18,53115 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,328 +0 1 Sept – 18 Sept · 2 observations
1,3281,328peak 1,3281 Sept18 Sept
18,636Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,328Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-07-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,328
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,223 below peak (18,531)
  • -574 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 692 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaddy SpecterFACEITLevel 5 · 1,328 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,308 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,328csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning44
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–53–6Last 10041%Win rateWWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility7.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.4
Utility7.4
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time560ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 4 Aug →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 9–3 · inferno, 18 Jul →
414msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 25 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 4 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 14mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B4018–2245%-0.02
ancientB178–947%-0.02
infernoA148–657%-0.01
nukeD103–730%-0.02
mirageD82–625%-0.03
anubisD62–433%-0.02
cache—30–30%-0.03
fachwerk—10–10%0.09
vertigo—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

122Matches
52%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
69.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23956%0.9013.2
Ancient2157%0.8911.9
Mirage2030%0.7012.3
Inferno1479%1.1615.1
Anubis838%0.7812.3
Nuke667%1.0815.5
Overpass450%0.6511.3
Train2100%0.9114.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.4%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
553msReaction time
26.7%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
11.56HE damage / grenade
15.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1081% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6773% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–9-0.087%31 Aug →
dust213–10-0.028%30 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0710%29 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0316%25 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0313%25 Aug →
dust28–13-0.048%20 Aug →
ancient9–130.0112%19 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0223%19 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0512%19 Aug →
nuke8–130.0714%19 Aug →
dust212–120.0420%19 Aug →
ancient10–130.0019%18 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0110%15 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0210%13 Aug →
dust213–60.019%12 Aug →
mirage0–7-0.1314%12 Aug →
inferno13–50.017%11 Aug →
ancient13–110.047%11 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0612%7 Aug →
dust213–110.0216%6 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0318%6 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.098%5 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.1015%5 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0222%5 Aug →
dust213–70.0110%5 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0026%5 Aug →
inferno13–20.1215%4 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0511%4 Aug →
dust27–13-0.086%3 Aug →
dust23–130.0518%2 Aug →
fachwerk7–130.0913%2 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.029%2 Aug →
dust211–130.0319%2 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0515%1 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.038%1 Aug →
dust213–6-0.019%1 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0014%1 Aug →
mirage11–130.017%1 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0619%1 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0312%31 Jul →
dust211–13-0.029%31 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0014%31 Jul →
nuke13–100.0417%31 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0925%29 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.038%29 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0612%28 Jul →
dust211–130.005%28 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.098%27 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0514%27 Jul →
dust21–13-0.117%27 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0013%26 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.007%26 Jul →
dust29–13-0.039%26 Jul →
dust24–13-0.106%26 Jul →
inferno13–60.0214%26 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0210%26 Jul →
vertigo10–13-0.0923%25 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0321%25 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0614%25 Jul →
dust215–150.0322%25 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0018%25 Jul →
cache9–130.0116%24 Jul →
dust211–13-0.038%24 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0013%24 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0121%24 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0310%23 Jul →
anubis16–13-0.0318%23 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0610%22 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0110%22 Jul →
ancient11–130.0325%22 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0413%21 Jul →
dust213–50.0221%21 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.029%20 Jul →
ancient13–40.0011%19 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0310%19 Jul →
dust216–12-0.065%19 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0110%19 Jul →
mirage13–80.017%18 Jul →
dust211–13-0.040%18 Jul →
inferno9–30.1229%18 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0616%18 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0611%18 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0216%18 Jul →
nuke15–150.0213%18 Jul →
ancient13–80.0211%17 Jul →
dust213–100.0219%17 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0813%17 Jul →
anubis7–130.0210%17 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0121%16 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0311%16 Jul →
mirage13–90.028%16 Jul →
dust213–70.0816%16 Jul →
anubis13–100.047%16 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0322%16 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0319%15 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0116%15 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.049%15 Jul →
dust213–90.0514%15 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0121%15 Jul →
dust213–20.0315%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.