firminogg

firminogg — CS2 Stats

BR76561198331037809[U:1:370772081]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

719Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,611Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,310Purple band · top ~15.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,015 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+710Premier CS Rating · 17,600 → 18,310

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,310 +1,181 31 Aug – 14 Nov · 41 days played
13,37118,310peak 18,31031 Aug14 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,015 +0 3 Sept – 21 Sept · 2 observations
1,0151,015peak 1,0153 Sept21 Sept
18,589Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,015Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,015
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 36 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,310
  • +1,122 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,690 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.9%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.6%11.2%12.0%11.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.690.991.020.32 short
Match win rate38.8%43.9%44.7%5.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfirminoggFACEITLevel 4 · 1,015 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,310 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,015csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning53
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateWWLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility6.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.3
Utility6.6
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time566ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 9 Sept →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 28 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 24 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2712–1544%-0.01
infernoD227–1532%-0.02
mirageB179–853%-0.01
nukeC125–742%-0.01
ancientC83–538%0.00
cacheA85–363%-0.01
anubisB63–350%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,609Lifetime kills
0.69K/D
3,600Matches
38.8%Match win rate
45.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
0.6%Shot accuracy
5,102MVPs
1,442Hours (in match)
1,629Bombs planted
578Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,644dust2
2,572nuke
2,270inferno
995vertigo
294cbble
193train
6italy
5office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
48%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
78.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1145%0.8414.4
Dust21030%0.9014.6
Ancient367%0.7915.3
Nuke367%0.8716.3
Anubis2100%0.9415.0
Inferno10%1.5024.0
Cache1100%0.699.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
71.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
560msReaction time
55.1%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
6.95HE damage / grenade
18.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0417%14 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0515%14 Nov →
ancient13–160.0016%14 Nov →
inferno9–13-0.0527%13 Nov →
inferno13–80.0426%12 Nov →
ancient13–60.0223%11 Nov →
mirage13–90.0126%11 Nov →
cache13–4-0.0521%10 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0124%7 Nov →
inferno16–14-0.0317%5 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0416%5 Nov →
mirage13–30.0012%5 Nov →
cache13–9-0.0227%5 Nov →
nuke15–150.0824%4 Nov →
dust21–13-0.0627%4 Nov →
ancient7–130.0129%4 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0031%4 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0513%31 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0511%31 Oct →
nuke13–100.0316%30 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0713%27 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0818%24 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0510%24 Oct →
nuke12–160.0314%22 Oct →
inferno9–130.0717%22 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0812%22 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0518%21 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0716%21 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0227%20 Oct →
anubis13–60.0434%17 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0317%17 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0423%17 Oct →
mirage13–60.0215%15 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0424%15 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.046%15 Oct →
dust216–140.0313%14 Oct →
dust216–130.0214%14 Oct →
inferno8–130.0014%14 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0016%13 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0812%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.0619%13 Oct →
inferno2–7-0.108%13 Oct →
mirage13–40.0213%10 Oct →
cache8–130.0128%10 Oct →
cache13–110.0023%10 Oct →
inferno13–50.0321%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
ancient13–10.0819%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0320%9 Oct →
cache9–130.0321%9 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0126%6 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0221%3 Oct →
dust213–70.0728%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0237%28 Sept →
dust27–130.0317%26 Sept →
inferno4–130.0121%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0222%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0122%24 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.1126%23 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.043%23 Sept →
inferno9–130.0428%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0421%21 Sept →
dust213–70.0321%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.048%19 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0123%19 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0328%17 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0127%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0314%16 Sept →
dust213–40.0819%16 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0330%15 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0735%15 Sept →
dust29–130.0118%12 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0517%11 Sept →
nuke13–50.0428%11 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0110%11 Sept →
dust213–60.0122%11 Sept →
dust213–90.0629%11 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0615%11 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0218%10 Sept →
dust213–40.1033%9 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0817%9 Sept →
cache13–70.0431%9 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0223%5 Sept →
ancient13–80.0119%5 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0226%5 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0523%5 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0910%4 Sept →
inferno13–90.0133%4 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0611%1 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0623%1 Sept →
cache13–60.0320%1 Sept →
mirage11–130.0414%1 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0610%1 Sept →
anubis13–20.0218%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0711%1 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0717%31 Aug →
ancient7–130.0111%31 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0523%31 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0314%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.