.v

.v — CS2 Stats

76561198330391863[U:1:370126135]Steam profile ↗

2,714Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,602Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4041 of 24581 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,914 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG.vFACEITLevel 10 · 2,914 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,602 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning69
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54451Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression10.0
Utility5.6
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.9
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time521ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy30.5%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.0% → last ⅓ avg 30.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — ancient 13–1
130Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 43% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C37162143%0.01
mirageB21101148%0.02
ancientS2015575%0.03
anubisA116555%0.02
cacheS54180%0.04
nuke32167%-0.01
inferno31233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,269Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
74.2ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage47650%1.0415.1
Ancient39751%1.1115.6
Dust233852%1.0414.8
Anubis33651%1.0815.1
Inferno15356%1.1916.0
Nuke10653%1.0615.8
Vertigo4949%1.0315.5
Overpass2744%1.0515.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.2%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
514msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
66.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
5.50HE damage / grenade
15.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4645 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5274% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–130.0423%28 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0111%28 Aug
cache13–8-0.0433%28 Aug
mirage16–130.0325%27 Aug
dust213–90.0221%27 Aug
dust213–90.0718%22 Aug
mirage13–100.0019%22 Aug
dust213–60.1143%22 Aug
ancient0–8-0.0650%22 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0423%21 Aug
anubis13–80.0426%20 Aug
cache9–130.0337%20 Aug
mirage13–70.1231%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0121%6 Aug
dust25–130.0043%6 Aug
dust213–110.0428%5 Aug
ancient13–10.1436%5 Aug
mirage11–130.0225%5 Aug
anubis13–40.0841%4 Aug
dust215–150.0127%4 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0150%4 Aug
anubis13–80.0321%4 Aug
dust213–90.0343%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0035%28 Jul
cache13–70.1531%24 Jul
ancient13–40.0343%24 Jul
mirage13–60.0523%22 Jul
cache13–100.0634%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0624%21 Jul
dust213–40.0726%21 Jul
dust210–130.0539%21 Jul
dust28–13-0.0232%18 Jul
dust22–13-0.0225%18 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0329%18 Jul
mirage10–130.0652%17 Jul
dust29–130.0731%7 Jul
nuke13–70.0143%7 Jul
cache13–80.0144%7 Jul
mirage13–40.0742%7 Jul
mirage12–160.0328%29 Jun
mirage13–70.0326%15 Jun
inferno6–130.0130%15 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0019%15 Jun
dust213–40.0929%4 Jun
dust23–8-0.090%4 Jun
dust213–100.0342%1 Jun
anubis13–110.0129%1 Jun
dust29–13-0.0531%1 Jun
mirage3–130.0143%30 May
ancient13–60.0221%27 May
inferno13–100.0325%25 May
anubis13–20.0724%23 May
ancient13–11-0.0524%20 May
dust213–90.0229%20 May
nuke13–16-0.0319%19 May
ancient9–130.0432%18 May
ancient13–100.0421%16 May
mirage16–120.0734%14 May
anubis11–13-0.0415%14 May
mirage10–130.0026%12 May
dust213–11-0.0415%11 May
mirage7–13-0.0432%2 May
dust213–11-0.0524%2 May
ancient13–90.0822%1 May
anubis8–13-0.0618%29 Apr
anubis10–130.0227%29 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0125%28 Apr
dust211–130.0421%28 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0129%25 Apr
dust28–13-0.0318%24 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0627%21 Apr
dust27–130.0132%20 Apr
dust25–13-0.0314%18 Apr
dust211–13-0.0345%16 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0529%16 Apr
dust25–130.0329%16 Apr
ancient11–130.0321%15 Apr
mirage13–60.0822%14 Apr
dust212–16-0.0437%13 Apr
ancient6–130.0019%13 Apr
dust213–11-0.0022%13 Apr
ancient13–10.1820%10 Apr
ancient13–00.0829%9 Apr
dust213–6-0.0132%8 Apr
dust210–130.0330%2 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0012%2 Apr
inferno7–130.0421%1 Apr
dust25–13-0.0028%1 Apr
dust213–110.0734%30 Mar
ancient14–160.0314%27 Mar
dust25–13-0.0233%27 Mar
ancient13–70.0226%27 Mar
anubis16–120.0226%27 Mar
ancient13–50.0524%27 Mar
dust213–60.1145%24 Mar
mirage13–110.0127%21 Mar
dust27–13-0.0316%21 Mar
dust213–60.0623%21 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0138%19 Mar
dust214–16-0.0114%19 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →