IKA — CS2 Stats

76561198324560643[U:1:364294915]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

484Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist

FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning57

Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–52–9Last 10039%Win rateLLWTLLTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–3–1 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

2–6–2 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

7–11–2 · 35% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+5.3 against its own average).

Aim6.6

Utility2.2

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch10.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning5.7

Utility2.2

Mechanics5.3

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time569ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 3 Sept →

48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · overpass, 9 Oct →

313msFastest reaction time · 3–12 · cache, 7 May →

13–1Biggest win · overpass, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	40	16–24	40%	-0.03
mirage	C	27	10–17	37%	-0.02
dust2	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.04
nuke	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
ancient	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.07
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

54Matches

61%Win rate

0.94Avg K/D

88.9ADR

30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

100%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	2	100%	1.32	18.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.90	19.0
Mirage	1	100%	0.78	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.1%Spray accuracy

74.0%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

572msReaction time

57.7%T opening success

37.1%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

5.84HE damage / grenade

2.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.1797 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 37.0626% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	-0.02	32%	29 Oct →
cache	9–13	0.01	14%	23 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.01	16%	22 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.11	13%	19 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	11%	19 Oct →
cache	3–13	-0.05	21%	19 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	13%	18 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	6%	17 Oct →
cache	13–6	-0.01	21%	16 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	35%	16 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	13%	15 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	11%	13 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	8%	11 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.00	26%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	13%	11 Oct →
overpass	13–1	0.06	48%	9 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	10%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.09	11%	5 Oct →
cache	3–13	-0.06	13%	3 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	13%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	18%	26 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	13%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–1	0.03	7%	26 Sept →
anubis	13–6	0.02	21%	25 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	7%	25 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.04	31%	25 Sept →
cache	5–6	-0.04	5%	24 Sept →
ancient	13–6	-0.08	6%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.08	24%	22 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	7%	22 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.06	14%	21 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	17%	21 Sept →
anubis	12–12	-0.04	17%	19 Sept →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	11%	18 Sept →
cache	12–12	-0.07	17%	17 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	7%	15 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.05	17%	13 Sept →
nuke	2–12	-0.03	17%	13 Sept →
dust2	12–12	-0.11	13%	12 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.06	20%	11 Sept →
inferno	5–13	-0.10	12%	10 Sept →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	23%	10 Sept →
cache	1–13	-0.10	23%	10 Sept →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	14%	9 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	14%	9 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	19%	4 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.10	24%	3 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.02	15%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.06	16%	2 Sept →
cache	12–12	-0.03	13%	2 Sept →
cache	13–3	-0.08	13%	1 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	33%	1 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	14%	1 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	4%	31 Aug →
cache	2–11	-0.02	18%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	15%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.05	11%	28 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	20%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.00	16%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	31%	22 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.04	14%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.01	8%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	12%	5 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.07	5%	1 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.02	22%	1 Aug →
dust2	3–4	-0.01	9%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	21%	27 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.03	9%	7 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.05	16%	4 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.06	10%	1 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	29%	1 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	19%	24 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.00	17%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	8%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.03	22%	22 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.04	12%	22 Jun →
cache	1–8	-0.06	13%	21 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.01	9%	19 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.06	11%	7 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.06	30%	7 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	-0.04	14%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.01	30%	20 May →
cache	2–13	0.02	19%	20 May →
cache	13–11	-0.07	26%	17 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	26%	14 May →
cache	13–11	0.04	13%	14 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	24%	13 May →
nuke	13–7	-0.05	14%	13 May →
cache	13–2	-0.04	10%	13 May →
cache	13–11	-0.08	26%	10 May →
cache	9–13	-0.06	9%	8 May →
cache	9–13	-0.05	19%	7 May →
cache	3–12	-0.08	20%	7 May →
cache	13–8	-0.05	21%	6 May →
cache	12–12	-0.03	16%	6 May →
cache	12–12	-0.05	11%	3 May →
cache	9–13	-0.08	29%	3 May →
nuke	13–5	0.02	16%	30 Apr →