kibeloco

kibeloco — CS2 Stats

QA76561198319256623[U:1:358990895]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,176Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,665Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,555Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#45438 of 237566 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−516Premier CS Rating · 23,071 → 22,555
0Faceit ELO · 1,104 → 1,104
+2Tracked matches · now 1,176
0.0ppWin rate · 33.3% → 33.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,555 +3,677 23 Aug22 Sept · 22 days played
18,58823,789peak 23,78923 Aug22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,104 +0 20 Sept21 Sept · 2 observations
1,1041,104peak 1,10420 Sept21 Sept
24,148Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,104Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,104
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 97 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,234 below peak (23,789)
  • +3,677 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,445 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,832), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate37.5%46.9%49.2%11.7% short
Shot accuracy12.4%13.0%13.3%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.891.081.120.23 short
Match win rate40.1%46.7%48.5%8.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Red band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkibelocoPREMIER22,555 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,104csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning44
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 714ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility5.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 696ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time689ms+56ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 5 Sept
33%Best headshot accuracy · 0–8 · mirage, 14 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · anubis, 6 Sept
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2171433%-0.02
dust2B2091145%-0.02
ancientA1911858%-0.03
cacheS1510567%0.02
infernoC94544%0.01
anubisB84450%-0.03
nukeC52340%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

256,499Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
12,740Matches
40.1%Match win rate
37.5%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy
26,030MVPs
5,665Hours (in match)
18,355Bombs planted
3,075Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4797,370
AWP36,648
MP94,725
UMP-454,273
Knife3,698

Lifetime map wins

23,636dust2
15,335inferno
4,533nuke
3,212vertigo
3,089train
585cbble
272lake
54italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

270Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
69.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5560%0.9813.7
Ancient5155%1.0014.6
Dust24351%1.0114.7
Inferno3951%0.9713.5
Anubis3546%1.0314.3
Nuke1644%1.0713.6
Cache1625%0.7711.6
Overpass933%0.6311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
696msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
4.29HE damage / grenade
9.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7281% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0411%22 Sept
cache13–8-0.0219%21 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0611%20 Sept
cache1–13-0.0226%20 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0511%19 Sept
inferno13–110.0013%19 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0513%19 Sept
cache13–5-0.017%19 Sept
overpass4–13-0.0919%19 Sept
mirage5–130.0314%19 Sept
dust27–130.0231%19 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0215%18 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0717%17 Sept
dust26–13-0.0524%16 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0411%15 Sept
mirage0–8-0.0333%14 Sept
dust213–30.1420%12 Sept
nuke6–13-0.1011%12 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0315%12 Sept
ancient6–13-0.057%12 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0323%12 Sept
overpass5–13-0.0925%12 Sept
dust211–130.0024%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0323%12 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0520%11 Sept
mirage4–13-0.1112%11 Sept
dust213–40.0013%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0125%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0312%11 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0717%10 Sept
mirage5–13-0.097%10 Sept
ancient13–30.0216%10 Sept
dust216–130.0117%10 Sept
nuke13–4-0.008%10 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0117%9 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0216%9 Sept
mirage9–130.0232%9 Sept
mirage13–5-0.027%9 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0122%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0226%8 Sept
anubis20–22-0.0713%8 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0113%8 Sept
cache6–13-0.0420%7 Sept
anubis8–13-0.018%7 Sept
ancient6–13-0.088%7 Sept
dust216–13-0.019%7 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0213%6 Sept
anubis13–2-0.0018%6 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0916%6 Sept
inferno13–80.0525%6 Sept
ancient13–50.0914%6 Sept
anubis10–13-0.076%6 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0116%6 Sept
cache13–90.0118%6 Sept
mirage15–150.0117%6 Sept
cache13–9-0.058%6 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0518%6 Sept
cache13–70.0422%5 Sept
cache8–130.0121%5 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0721%5 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0219%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0922%5 Sept
cache13–20.0118%5 Sept
inferno13–8-0.1015%5 Sept
anubis13–60.0315%5 Sept
ancient9–130.0219%5 Sept
dust213–11-0.098%5 Sept
dust24–13-0.0329%5 Sept
cache13–30.1621%5 Sept
dust26–13-0.0716%4 Sept
dust213–9-0.0315%4 Sept
dust22–9-0.057%4 Sept
nuke13–90.0121%2 Sept
dust27–130.0114%1 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0223%1 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0211%31 Aug
cache13–80.076%30 Aug
inferno15–150.0516%30 Aug
nuke15–150.0616%30 Aug
cache13–110.0819%30 Aug
inferno10–130.0126%30 Aug
cache11–130.0627%30 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0115%30 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0314%30 Aug
cache14–160.0414%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0212%29 Aug
inferno5–130.0017%29 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0222%29 Aug
cache13–50.0227%29 Aug
mirage13–40.1227%29 Aug
inferno2–10-0.0025%28 Aug
dust212–12-0.0116%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0526%27 Aug
dust213–10-0.0620%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.044%26 Aug
ancient13–20.0113%26 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0116%26 Aug
ancient11–130.0124%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0821%23 Aug
mirage9–130.0017%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →