TheDarkOneAU

TheDarkOneAU — CS2 Stats

CA76561198315759486[U:1:355493758]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

393Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,555Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32786 of 221221 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 30 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,555 +2,609 30 May5 Sept · 31 days played
20,83424,449peak 24,44930 May5 Sept
24,449Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-05-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 894 below peak (24,449)
  • +573 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,445 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTheDarkOneAUPREMIER23,555 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning57
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateLLLWWTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time583ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 15 Jun
40%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · mirage, 13 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 27 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 15 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 53% over 19infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC41182344%-0.04
dust2B1910953%-0.03
ancientB1910953%-0.03
infernoD62433%0.00
anubisB63350%-0.06
overpass43175%-0.02
nuke3030%-0.06
cache21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

105Matches
47%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
82.6ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage956%1.0414.7
Dust2956%1.0214.1
Ancient757%0.9616.6
Inferno650%1.0615.2
Nuke333%1.5017.3
Overpass250%1.3820.0
Anubis10%0.315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
27.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.1%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
590msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
50.1%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
7.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.684% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0315%5 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0325%3 Sept
dust28–13-0.0920%3 Sept
dust213–20.0221%2 Sept
mirage13–40.0030%2 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0524%1 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0121%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0825%27 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0916%24 Aug
dust211–13-0.0927%24 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0327%18 Aug
dust29–130.0232%14 Aug
cache13–70.0117%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0417%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0421%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0415%24 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1012%24 Jul
dust216–14-0.0727%21 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0510%21 Jul
ancient11–60.0121%21 Jul
dust213–60.0324%21 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0319%19 Jul
inferno9–130.0533%19 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0318%9 Jul
cache9–13-0.0514%9 Jul
mirage13–80.0525%9 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0425%5 Jul
overpass13–80.0117%30 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0813%29 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0620%24 Jun
dust213–9-0.0120%24 Jun
ancient13–80.0229%24 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0426%22 Jun
mirage13–20.0137%22 Jun
dust29–13-0.0528%22 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0616%22 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0816%21 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0814%20 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0726%20 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0522%19 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0414%19 Jun
mirage6–13-0.029%19 Jun
dust213–8-0.0229%18 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0126%18 Jun
ancient3–1-0.0633%18 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0322%16 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0524%16 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0215%15 Jun
dust213–3-0.0319%15 Jun
inferno13–10.1030%15 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0915%15 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0519%15 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0028%15 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0524%14 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0911%14 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0940%13 Jun
ancient5–130.0031%12 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0116%12 Jun
dust25–13-0.0612%12 Jun
mirage4–130.0822%12 Jun
dust213–10-0.0518%12 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0825%12 Jun
mirage13–60.0423%9 Jun
mirage7–13-0.1025%9 Jun
mirage13–90.0024%9 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0621%9 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0324%9 Jun
dust20–13-0.1028%9 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0327%8 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0820%7 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0913%7 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0524%7 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0633%7 Jun
dust213–100.0225%7 Jun
ancient5–130.0013%7 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0415%6 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0621%5 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0833%3 Jun
dust213–7-0.0324%3 Jun
mirage5–13-0.1137%3 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0326%3 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0520%3 Jun
dust25–13-0.0123%3 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0229%3 Jun
ancient13–50.0633%3 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0718%3 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0633%2 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0624%2 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0620%2 Jun
inferno11–130.0029%1 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0717%1 Jun
dust213–10-0.0422%1 Jun
mirage6–2-0.0625%1 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0216%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0227%1 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0131%1 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0120%1 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0727%1 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0722%31 May
nuke15–15-0.0513%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →