✪ brimmz

✪ brimmz — CS2 Stats

US76561198315272692[U:1:355006964]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,940Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,609Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating23,575Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37191 of 259889 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,455 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,575 +848 30 Aug – 1 Nov · 29 days played
20,49423,575peak 23,57530 Aug1 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,455 +0 30 Aug – 18 Sept · 4 observations
1,4551,455peak 1,45530 Aug18 Sept
23,575Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,455Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,455
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 76 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,575
  • +1,631 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,425 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate48.4%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy13.8%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.371.031.05above
Match win rate42.8%45.2%45.7%2.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ brimmzFACEITLevel 6 · 1,455 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,575 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,455csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning44
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateWWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +5.8pp headshot accuracy · −60ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 441ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time522ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 493ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 14 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 3 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3013–1743%0.01
mirageB158–753%0.00
ancientD144–1029%-0.01
anubisC114–736%0.03
cacheA117–464%0.01
nukeC94–544%-0.01
infernoS97–278%0.03
fachwerk—10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

280,166Lifetime kills
1.37K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
9,663Matches
42.8%Match win rate
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
25,257MVPs
4,675Hours (in match)
13,255Bombs planted
4,173Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4791,615
AWP12,601
P2507,439
FAMAS5,340

Lifetime map wins

15,766dust2
12,315inferno
5,698train
4,755nuke
3,184vertigo
2,358cbble
102office
40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,410Matches
50%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
75.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage43353%1.1915.8
Ancient29149%1.1916.0
Anubis26255%1.1516.0
Dust218244%1.1615.5
Inferno15046%1.0715.5
Nuke11746%1.2216.0
Vertigo9056%1.1414.7
Overpass5347%1.1615.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
68.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
535msReaction time
45.3%T opening success
30.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
5.51HE damage / grenade
11.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.776% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0320%1 Nov →
nuke13–4-0.0213%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0513%31 Oct →
mirage13–110.0914%31 Oct →
dust28–130.0119%23 Oct →
inferno13–70.0415%21 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0532%17 Oct →
cache13–100.0415%16 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0527%15 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0719%13 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0413%11 Oct →
cache1–10-0.0823%10 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.118%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1113%8 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0113%8 Oct →
cache13–10.0114%7 Oct →
ancient13–50.0810%5 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0016%4 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0313%4 Oct →
dust23–13-0.055%4 Oct →
ancient10–130.0218%3 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.018%3 Oct →
cache22–20-0.0514%3 Oct →
cache13–00.01100%3 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0220%3 Oct →
inferno2–00.000%3 Oct →
mirage7–00.0167%3 Oct →
nuke13–10.1024%3 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0328%3 Oct →
cache13–60.0916%2 Oct →
cache13–9-0.048%2 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0226%1 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.036%1 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0510%30 Sept →
dust213–30.1018%30 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0310%28 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0320%28 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0029%28 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0614%28 Sept →
mirage13–60.0314%28 Sept →
anubis13–60.0910%28 Sept →
mirage4–130.0314%28 Sept →
dust27–130.0329%25 Sept →
anubis13–30.1017%25 Sept →
ancient8–130.0613%24 Sept →
fachwerk5–130.027%23 Sept →
dust25–130.0025%22 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0417%22 Sept →
mirage13–70.0418%21 Sept →
dust213–80.0010%21 Sept →
nuke13–80.0514%20 Sept →
anubis6–130.0312%20 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0114%20 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0016%20 Sept →
dust213–50.0928%19 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0836%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0610%19 Sept →
inferno13–10.0721%19 Sept →
anubis13–50.0113%19 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0322%19 Sept →
inferno13–10.034%19 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0217%18 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0112%18 Sept →
ancient16–120.019%18 Sept →
inferno9–50.1312%14 Sept →
mirage13–110.0515%14 Sept →
mirage11–130.0414%14 Sept →
mirage6–130.0122%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0313%13 Sept →
dust217–19-0.038%13 Sept →
cache13–160.068%13 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.016%13 Sept →
anubis11–130.0424%12 Sept →
dust213–110.0823%12 Sept →
dust22–130.0112%12 Sept →
dust213–50.0318%12 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.052%11 Sept →
dust29–130.0115%11 Sept →
anubis11–130.0220%10 Sept →
anubis15–19-0.0111%10 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.080%10 Sept →
ancient12–40.0322%10 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0815%9 Sept →
mirage16–120.018%7 Sept →
dust213–80.0215%7 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0223%7 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0122%7 Sept →
anubis8–130.0117%6 Sept →
dust29–130.0416%6 Sept →
cache13–60.1022%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.0411%5 Sept →
dust29–130.0616%4 Sept →
dust213–90.0219%4 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0020%4 Sept →
dust215–150.0324%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0215%1 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0216%31 Aug →
inferno13–70.0026%30 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.008%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0012%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.