2011 Dirk Nowitzki — CS2 Stats

AU76561198315167125[U:1:354901397]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,410Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.1 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating20,982Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#67881 of 252676 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,088 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,982 -8,130 5 May – 23 Sept · 23 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,088 +0 31 Aug – 3 Sept · 2 observations

29,419Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,088Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

38Days played since 2026-05-03

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,088
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 412 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

8,213 below peak (29,195)
+983 over 30 days · improving
-5,583 over 90 days
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,018 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning69

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–40–4Last 10056%Win rateWLWLWWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −104ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 26%
Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

6–3–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

12–7–1 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 25%
Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility5.7

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels6.5

Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning6.9

Utility5.7

Mechanics8.8

Opening Duels6.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time588ms+27ms

first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy26.0%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 21 Aug →

54%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · nuke, 16 Aug →

438msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 23 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · train, 29 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11cacheWeakest map · 43% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	26	13–13	50%	0.03
mirage	B	24	12–12	50%	0.02
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	0.01
nuke	A	14	8–6	57%	0.03
inferno	S	11	9–2	82%	0.05
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	0.02
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	0.04
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,105Matches

57%Win rate

1.26Avg K/D

79.5ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	43	42%	1.01	15.1
Dust2	41	59%	1.31	15.9
Anubis	16	38%	1.14	16.9
Ancient	13	38%	0.87	13.8
Nuke	12	42%	1.12	15.8
Inferno	10	70%	1.24	17.6
Cache	7	71%	1.01	14.9
Vertigo	4	50%	1.12	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy

37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.8%Spray accuracy

89.7%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

575msReaction time

50.6%T opening success

59.1%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

6.86HE damage / grenade

7.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–5	0.03	29%	23 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.00	22%	22 Sept →
inferno	13–1	0.04	25%	22 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.04	24%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.00	29%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.05	21%	30 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.03	25%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	18%	26 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	39%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	21%	26 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.03	19%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	13%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	22%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.02	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.00	31%	25 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.06	26%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	47%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	18%	21 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.08	20%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.20	41%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	29%	21 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.04	20%	18 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	10%	18 Aug →
nuke	5–0	0.09	54%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	24%	16 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.09	25%	16 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	22%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	30%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	33%	11 Aug →
dust2	9–0	-0.03	8%	11 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.00	35%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.08	28%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.01	32%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	17%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	22%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.04	25%	4 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.03	18%	4 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.07	34%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	19%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.16	25%	31 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.06	22%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.08	25%	6 Jul →
mirage	1–13	0.02	48%	6 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	29%	6 Jul →
train	13–0	0.09	29%	29 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	22%	29 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.03	33%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.13	29%	25 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.06	19%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.07	16%	25 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.01	28%	24 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.03	31%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.07	32%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.08	35%	15 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.09	35%	13 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.08	40%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.07	26%	6 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.06	33%	6 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.08	47%	3 Jun →
anubis	12–12	-0.03	30%	3 Jun →
nuke	0–13	-0.09	33%	28 May →
nuke	13–8	0.01	26%	28 May →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	17%	28 May →
anubis	16–14	0.02	43%	27 May →
cache	13–7	0.05	32%	26 May →
dust2	16–12	0.05	40%	26 May →
anubis	13–8	0.05	27%	26 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	26%	26 May →
dust2	13–8	0.03	37%	26 May →
dust2	10–13	0.05	31%	25 May →
mirage	13–11	0.08	22%	25 May →
mirage	13–8	0.05	26%	25 May →
nuke	13–11	0.00	28%	25 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	15%	23 May →
cache	4–3	-0.10	0%	23 May →
mirage	11–13	0.04	26%	18 May →
dust2	13–16	0.00	31%	18 May →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	33%	17 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	36%	17 May →
dust2	13–11	0.09	20%	17 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	29%	16 May →
mirage	12–5	0.01	24%	16 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	36%	16 May →
inferno	13–5	0.03	27%	16 May →
nuke	1–13	-0.07	25%	15 May →
dust2	13–5	0.07	31%	15 May →
anubis	13–7	0.06	28%	15 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	17%	13 May →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	25%	13 May →
mirage	13–1	0.14	40%	13 May →
mirage	13–4	0.09	26%	13 May →
dust2	13–6	0.05	28%	12 May →
dust2	16–13	0.04	33%	12 May →
mirage	2–0	0.00	0%	12 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	18%	12 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	23%	7 May →
cache	12–12	0.08	34%	6 May →
cache	13–4	0.07	27%	6 May →
inferno	13–9	0.01	19%	5 May →
cache	9–13	0.04	26%	3 May →