southpaw

southpaw — CS2 Stats

US76561198314935955[U:1:354670227]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

440Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,157Blue band · top ~32.9% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,157 -838 30 Aug – 18 Oct · 27 days played
13,07517,279peak 17,27930 Aug18 Oct
17,969Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,122 below peak (17,279)
  • -310 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 843 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsouthpawPREMIER14,157 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning66
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWLLTWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 20

  • 11–6–3 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.8
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time610ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 8 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–7 · mirage, 8 Sept →
430msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2515–1060%0.01
mirageA2514–1156%0.01
nukeA1912–763%0.03
infernoA169–756%0.01
cacheD61–517%0.00
ancientD50–50%0.00
anubis—21–150%0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.01
office—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
25%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
76.9ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
60%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2367%1.6216.7
Nuke2100%2.0715.0
Ancient10%1.4028.0
Mirage10%0.6511.0
Cache10%0.6716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
612msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
5.66HE damage / grenade
7.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9724% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0016%28 Oct →
dust213–40.0414%18 Oct →
vertigo4–130.0128%13 Oct →
dust213–80.0215%12 Oct →
nuke13–60.0626%12 Oct →
nuke1–7-0.0740%9 Oct →
cache7–130.0117%9 Oct →
dust212–120.0220%8 Oct →
inferno13–20.2125%8 Oct →
office12–12-0.0326%7 Oct →
dust212–120.1033%7 Oct →
nuke13–70.1628%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0618%6 Oct →
nuke13–90.1218%6 Oct →
ancient5–130.0526%6 Oct →
dust213–20.0239%4 Oct →
cache13–90.0025%4 Oct →
dust213–100.069%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0519%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0215%3 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.024%2 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0113%1 Oct →
cache15–150.0316%1 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0616%1 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0717%29 Sept →
mirage13–70.0322%27 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0614%27 Sept →
nuke11–130.119%27 Sept →
inferno10–130.0219%27 Sept →
mirage13–100.0220%26 Sept →
mirage13–70.0320%26 Sept →
anubis10–130.0818%26 Sept →
inferno13–10.0419%26 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0419%25 Sept →
nuke6–130.0015%23 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.038%23 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0026%23 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0328%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0619%19 Sept →
nuke13–20.0315%19 Sept →
nuke0–5-0.050%19 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0213%19 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0112%17 Sept →
nuke13–110.0317%17 Sept →
mirage9–130.1014%17 Sept →
cache7–13-0.023%17 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0314%17 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0111%16 Sept →
mirage7–130.029%16 Sept →
dust28–130.0218%16 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0525%15 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0210%15 Sept →
cache2–13-0.076%14 Sept →
dust27–130.0324%14 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0014%14 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0132%13 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0423%13 Sept →
nuke13–80.0633%13 Sept →
dust216–120.0131%13 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0013%12 Sept →
inferno13–70.0115%12 Sept →
nuke13–20.1230%12 Sept →
dust213–50.0030%9 Sept →
mirage13–80.0420%9 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0825%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0242%8 Sept →
inferno4–130.0130%8 Sept →
inferno13–60.1527%8 Sept →
mirage1–7-0.0350%8 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0021%7 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0619%7 Sept →
mirage13–50.0426%7 Sept →
mirage10–130.0027%7 Sept →
nuke13–40.0513%7 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0124%7 Sept →
dust213–30.0329%7 Sept →
mirage16–130.0314%6 Sept →
dust213–50.0327%6 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0524%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0115%6 Sept →
dust22–70.0115%6 Sept →
mirage14–160.0021%6 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0318%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0220%5 Sept →
mirage13–100.0521%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.1124%5 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0221%5 Sept →
cache5–130.0417%5 Sept →
mirage13–70.019%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0116%4 Sept →
dust213–50.0518%4 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0216%4 Sept →
mirage13–30.0538%4 Sept →
ancient5–130.0421%4 Sept →
mirage13–80.0421%3 Sept →
dust27–130.0525%3 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0213%3 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.029%3 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0517%2 Sept →
inferno4–130.0117%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.