citron

citron — CS2 Stats

US76561198312024088[U:1:351758360]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,979Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,639Top 1% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1892 of 260001 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,777 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−896Premier CS Rating · 29,535 → 28,639

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,639 -900 26 Aug – 5 Nov · 23 days played
28,63929,845peak 29,84526 Aug5 Nov
29,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,777Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,777
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 223 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,206 below peak (29,845)
  • -768 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,361 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcitronFACEITLevel 10 · 2,777 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,639 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,777csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning65
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–57–2Last 10041%Win rateWWLWLLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +81ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.9
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.5
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time536ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 5 Sept →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · vertigo, 12 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 3 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 19anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2812–1643%0.00
ancientA1912–763%0.01
dust2D154–1127%-0.01
nukeC145–936%0.00
cacheC135–838%-0.03
infernoC52–340%-0.01
anubisD51–420%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,598Matches
54%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
81.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
21Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage64752%1.0915.8
Ancient48757%1.1616.3
Dust230657%1.1415.7
Nuke23861%1.2016.2
Anubis23455%1.0815.4
Inferno16451%1.1016.4
Overpass10056%0.9714.7
Vertigo5147%1.0516.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
540msReaction time
50.3%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
7.74HE damage / grenade
7.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.7459% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0018%5 Nov →
ancient13–100.0216%4 Nov →
inferno4–130.0128%31 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0137%31 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0719%28 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0323%26 Oct →
mirage6–130.0522%26 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0110%23 Oct →
dust213–90.0726%23 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0023%23 Oct →
cache13–30.0236%22 Oct →
dust213–30.0119%22 Oct →
cache13–30.0216%17 Oct →
dust213–90.0222%17 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0022%17 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0727%16 Oct →
dust213–100.0121%15 Oct →
ancient13–80.0325%13 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0521%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0415%13 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0014%12 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0213%12 Oct →
dust27–130.0523%11 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0640%11 Oct →
inferno10–130.0024%10 Oct →
dust210–130.0022%10 Oct →
cache7–13-0.059%9 Oct →
mirage11–130.0113%9 Oct →
mirage13–100.0721%9 Oct →
cache0–13-0.0744%9 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0513%9 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0413%9 Oct →
mirage7–130.0821%9 Oct →
dust213–160.0122%9 Oct →
dust21–13-0.070%9 Oct →
nuke9–130.0119%9 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.022%8 Oct →
ancient13–80.1032%7 Oct →
mirage9–130.0317%5 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0224%5 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0818%5 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0328%4 Oct →
ancient13–80.0015%3 Oct →
ancient8–130.0414%2 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0247%1 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0324%1 Oct →
nuke6–130.0336%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0310%30 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0516%30 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0424%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0835%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.0513%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0523%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0411%29 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0513%29 Sept →
cache13–30.0223%28 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0122%27 Sept →
mirage13–40.0424%27 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0423%26 Sept →
nuke5–130.0522%26 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0321%25 Sept →
mirage13–00.1023%23 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0614%22 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0517%22 Sept →
mirage8–130.0320%22 Sept →
dust27–130.0215%21 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0226%21 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0213%21 Sept →
dust215–150.0622%18 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0519%15 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0230%14 Sept →
mirage11–130.0126%13 Sept →
mirage13–50.0321%12 Sept →
nuke1–130.0356%12 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0475%12 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0314%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0418%11 Sept →
ancient7–130.0412%11 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0122%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.0819%9 Sept →
cache5–130.0632%6 Sept →
anubis13–60.1225%5 Sept →
dust21–13-0.070%3 Sept →
cache2–13-0.1233%3 Sept →
ancient3–20.0933%3 Sept →
ancient1–00.070%3 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0914%1 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0512%1 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0118%31 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0120%31 Aug →
anubis9–130.0320%30 Aug →
anubis10–130.0014%30 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0625%29 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0621%29 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0624%28 Aug →
mirage13–70.1021%28 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0320%27 Aug →
nuke13–80.0424%27 Aug →
ancient13–110.0218%26 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0920%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.