永恒的夥伴

永恒的夥伴 — CS2 Stats

76561198311666369[U:1:351400641]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

369Tracked matches44%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,000Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate39.1%46.8%48.3%9.2% short
Shot accuracy2.9%13.0%13.2%10.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.070.02 short
Match win rate40.2%46.3%46.9%6.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG永恒的夥伴FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning65
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD504010Last 10050%Win rateWWWLLTLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 893 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.1
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch1.4

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.5
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact3.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time543ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy13.9%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 13 May
26%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · mirage, 8 May
391msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 17 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 21 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB33161748%0.05
dust2B25121348%0.03
mirageC2081240%0.04
nukeS65183%0.06
ancientB63350%0.03
cache41325%0.00
anubis330100%0.11
overpass21150%0.01
train110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

139,139Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
4,840Matches
40.2%Match win rate
39.1%Headshot %
2.9%Shot accuracy
10,312MVPs
2,651Hours (in match)
2,701Bombs planted
564Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4772,984
AWP11,545
MP93,119
FAMAS1,902
SG 5531,405

Lifetime map wins

9,732dust2
6,063inferno
2,139nuke
1,828vertigo
665train
424office
114lake
105ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

207Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
96.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6946%1.1418.1
Anubis4448%1.2418.8
Inferno2861%1.1819.1
Ancient1856%1.1017.6
Vertigo1759%1.3922.5
Dust21747%1.1120.6
Nuke1267%1.3619.8
Train1100%1.2922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
543msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
11.78HE damage / grenade
4.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.6507% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0924%15 Sept
dust213–100.0313%25 Aug
mirage13–20.0320%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0323%25 Aug
dust22–13-0.019%25 Aug
cache15–15-0.008%25 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0512%21 Aug
dust29–130.0420%9 Aug
inferno12–120.049%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0219%8 Aug
dust213–40.0516%8 Aug
mirage11–130.0115%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0110%8 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0514%7 Aug
dust29–130.046%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0510%6 Aug
nuke13–90.0212%21 Jul
ancient13–70.0311%21 Jul
dust213–80.0317%21 Jul
inferno11–130.0512%17 Jul
inferno6–130.068%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0319%17 Jul
dust20–13-0.030%17 Jul
nuke11–130.099%17 Jul
anubis13–30.1115%16 Jul
dust213–60.0521%16 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0113%16 Jul
dust213–60.0916%16 Jul
nuke13–50.0614%16 Jul
inferno4–130.0614%10 Jul
inferno12–120.0210%10 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0221%9 Jul
inferno13–100.0217%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.0211%9 Jul
inferno13–60.0516%9 Jul
cache12–12-0.0121%9 Jul
inferno13–90.0713%29 Jun
inferno9–130.0525%29 Jun
dust213–40.0220%29 Jun
inferno6–130.0410%29 Jun
inferno12–120.0318%29 Jun
inferno10–130.0413%28 Jun
inferno13–100.0612%28 Jun
inferno11–130.0626%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0215%28 Jun
inferno13–80.1112%28 Jun
inferno13–60.0920%28 Jun
inferno12–120.0312%26 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0320%26 Jun
inferno13–70.0515%26 Jun
mirage13–20.0818%24 Jun
mirage7–130.0720%24 Jun
dust210–130.067%24 Jun
inferno8–130.0318%23 Jun
inferno13–90.1014%23 Jun
dust210–13-0.0013%23 Jun
mirage12–120.1012%23 Jun
inferno13–40.1813%22 Jun
ancient4–130.0818%22 Jun
dust213–110.0016%22 Jun
mirage5–130.0913%22 Jun
nuke13–50.0421%22 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0011%22 Jun
mirage13–40.1120%22 Jun
train13–4-0.0618%22 Jun
cache12–120.0418%22 Jun
nuke13–80.1120%22 Jun
inferno13–70.0922%21 Jun
inferno13–30.0518%21 Jun
inferno13–80.0520%21 Jun
dust28–13-0.0320%21 Jun
ancient13–10.0213%21 Jun
dust211–130.0314%21 Jun
mirage13–70.0725%15 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0112%15 Jun
anubis13–30.1314%15 Jun
mirage13–80.1220%15 Jun
dust211–130.1415%14 Jun
mirage13–50.025%14 Jun
inferno13–80.0212%14 Jun
ancient0–10-0.037%14 Jun
dust213–70.0314%7 Jun
dust213–110.0215%1 Jun
mirage13–50.0316%1 Jun
anubis13–50.1118%31 May
overpass4–00.000%31 May
inferno12–120.0713%27 May
dust213–80.0621%23 May
inferno10–50.0520%23 May
mirage4–130.0017%23 May
overpass3–60.027%23 May
mirage3–130.019%23 May
dust27–130.0514%21 May
inferno13–80.2321%13 May
ancient13–30.1016%13 May
mirage13–110.0617%13 May
mirage11–13-0.0014%13 May
nuke13–70.049%13 May
mirage11–130.0526%8 May
dust213–110.0613%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →