ausland

ausland — CS2 Stats

NO76561198309336410[U:1:349070682]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

598Tracked matches31%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,229Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating16,209Purple band · top ~23.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,209 -5,874 21 Apr – 27 Oct · 18 days played
16,20922,083peak 22,08321 Apr27 Oct
22,083Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-04-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,874 below peak (22,083)
  • -2,146 over 30 days · declining
  • -5,275 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,791 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches93+6
Win rate22%0%+22pp
K/D0.930.77+0.16
Headshot %50%46%+4pp

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 28 Oct 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 23 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate46.8%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy14.4%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.110.980.99above
Match win rate49.5%43.3%43.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGauslandFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER16,209 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning41
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–59–1Last 10040%Win rateLLLWTLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

  • 1–8–1 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.7 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch9.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time574ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–11 · cache, 14 May →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 11 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 9 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 1 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 12ancientWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2411–1346%-0.00
mirageD237–1630%-0.00
cacheB136–746%0.01
ancientD132–1115%-0.01
anubisB126–650%-0.02
nukeB84–450%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%0.03
cache_b—20–20%-0.03
vertigo—21–150%-0.01
inferno—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,490Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
1,668Matches
49.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
46.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
4,609MVPs
788Hours (in match)
1,682Bombs planted
485Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,132dust2
1,764inferno
682nuke
605vertigo
427train
406cbble
98assault
84lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
75%Win rate
1.74Avg K/D
133.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache250%1.9429.0
Ancient1100%1.9121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
571msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
10.00HE damage / grenade
16.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1852% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0221%27 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0815%27 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0411%25 Oct →
dust213–80.0829%17 Oct →
cache15–150.0111%9 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.090%8 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0315%3 Sept →
dust23–9-0.0124%2 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0416%2 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0014%30 Aug →
cache13–100.0223%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0326%20 Aug →
mirage8–130.0319%20 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0527%19 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0725%16 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0316%14 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0317%14 Aug →
anubis13–90.0515%14 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0624%13 Aug →
cache13–100.0417%12 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0618%12 Aug →
cache8–130.0324%11 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0241%11 Aug →
dust211–3-0.0420%9 Aug →
nuke4–130.0421%9 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.1019%1 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0111%1 Aug →
dust213–110.1029%1 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0524%1 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0020%1 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0527%1 Aug →
ancient9–130.0112%1 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0211%1 Aug →
dust213–10.0528%1 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0319%31 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0412%31 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0423%26 Jul →
ancient7–130.0020%26 Jul →
dust216–12-0.0123%9 Jul →
ancient8–130.0622%9 Jul →
nuke13–90.0429%9 Jul →
cache13–30.0333%9 Jul →
dust213–20.0922%9 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0116%9 Jul →
anubis13–110.0021%27 May →
dust29–13-0.0222%27 May →
cache13–60.0113%15 May →
cache8–130.0124%15 May →
cache13–110.1216%14 May →
mirage8–130.0017%14 May →
mirage13–11-0.0320%14 May →
ancient6–130.0123%14 May →
mirage13–30.0412%14 May →
overpass13–90.0415%14 May →
nuke4–13-0.057%13 May →
cache4–13-0.0014%13 May →
dust213–70.0313%13 May →
anubis13–100.0213%13 May →
cache10–13-0.0321%13 May →
mirage13–90.028%13 May →
ancient10–130.0114%13 May →
mirage4–130.0316%12 May →
anubis19–160.0215%12 May →
mirage16–130.0422%11 May →
mirage7–130.0419%11 May →
mirage8–13-0.116%25 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0013%25 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.1511%25 Apr →
nuke13–100.1125%25 Apr →
dust213–16-0.0613%24 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.0629%24 Apr →
cache_b8–13-0.0433%24 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0518%24 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0324%24 Apr →
anubis13–90.0024%24 Apr →
ancient9–130.0019%24 Apr →
mirage8–130.0110%24 Apr →
inferno13–7-0.0312%24 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0334%24 Apr →
vertigo13–11-0.0613%24 Apr →
mirage10–130.0510%24 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0919%24 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0024%23 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0115%23 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0114%23 Apr →
mirage17–190.0414%23 Apr →
dust213–160.0518%23 Apr →
cache_b6–13-0.0212%22 Apr →
mirage13–90.017%22 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0412%22 Apr →
mirage5–130.0317%22 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.028%22 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0328%22 Apr →
vertigo5–130.0414%21 Apr →
mirage13–100.0715%21 Apr →
dust24–130.0530%21 Apr →
overpass13–70.0215%21 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0223%21 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0019%20 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0026%20 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.