g3ckz

g3ckz — CS2 Stats

76561198309172319[U:1:348906591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,586Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,242 → 1,242
+3Tracked matches · now 1,586
0.0ppWin rate · 37.9% → 37.9%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 31 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,620 -5,357 2 Feb22 Jun · 23 days played
19,62024,977peak 24,9772 Feb22 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,242 +0 2 Sept12 Sept · 2 observations
1,2421,242peak 1,2422 Sept12 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,242Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-01-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,242
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGg3ckzPEAK ELO1,242csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning48
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37585Last 10037%Win rateLLLLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −92ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.8
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time549ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 2 Jun
47%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 11 Mar
391msFastest reaction time · 8–1 · dust2, 10 Aug
13–3Biggest win · dust2, 19 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L4Current streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 52% over 27mirageWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B27141352%-0.02
ancientD2671927%-0.02
nukeC167944%-0.02
anubisC94544%-0.04
overpassD93633%-0.03
mirageD5050%-0.04
inferno41325%-0.01
sanctum1010%-0.13
poseidon1010%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.09
train110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

553Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
73.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9153%0.9914.3
Anubis5751%1.0515.4
Mirage5645%0.9114.8
Vertigo4760%1.0116.3
Dust23244%1.0414.4
Nuke2752%0.9715.6
Inferno2560%0.9614.5
Overpass1338%0.8714.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
556msReaction time
20.5%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
6.95HE damage / grenade
7.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.4666% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0720%16 Sept
ancient11–130.0317%16 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0614%8 Sept
dust211–13-0.0324%8 Sept
nuke13–50.0313%1 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0324%1 Sept
dust213–90.0221%31 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0522%30 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0318%30 Aug
dust26–130.0117%24 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0615%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0129%24 Aug
dust28–1-0.020%10 Aug
dust213–110.0316%10 Aug
overpass15–15-0.0018%22 Jun
dust23–13-0.0213%22 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0117%22 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0611%22 Jun
ancient7–130.0321%22 Jun
nuke13–60.0828%22 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0838%22 Jun
ancient13–40.0416%22 Jun
dust29–13-0.0818%22 Jun
dust213–4-0.0019%22 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0116%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0121%20 Jun
dust22–13-0.0524%20 Jun
dust212–160.0222%20 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0615%20 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0011%20 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0710%20 Jun
anubis6–130.0222%19 Jun
dust213–3-0.0420%19 Jun
ancient0–13-0.0220%15 Jun
ancient1–13-0.1311%15 Jun
anubis5–13-0.1617%15 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0818%14 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0521%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.0221%9 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0410%3 Jun
dust211–13-0.0730%3 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0216%3 Jun
dust213–40.0923%2 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0116%2 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0112%2 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0525%23 Apr
ancient13–110.0816%23 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0311%25 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0226%25 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0223%11 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0547%11 Mar
dust213–90.0324%10 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0213%10 Mar
anubis13–40.0433%5 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0613%25 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0228%21 Feb
dust213–11-0.0237%21 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0228%20 Feb
dust213–70.0533%20 Feb
dust213–110.0122%20 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0020%20 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0416%20 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0617%20 Feb
dust216–12-0.0322%17 Feb
dust215–15-0.0425%17 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0917%11 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0612%10 Feb
ancient13–60.0933%10 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0614%8 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0223%8 Feb
dust213–10-0.0320%8 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0315%8 Feb
nuke4–130.0825%5 Feb
ancient6–130.0216%5 Feb
nuke9–130.0110%5 Feb
dust213–5-0.0318%5 Feb
ancient9–13-0.059%5 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0716%4 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0725%4 Feb
inferno8–8-0.0814%4 Feb
nuke9–6-0.0033%4 Feb
sanctum4–9-0.1316%4 Feb
poseidon5–9-0.0525%4 Feb
vertigo7–9-0.0917%4 Feb
inferno9–70.0416%4 Feb
inferno8–80.0119%4 Feb
overpass9–30.0421%4 Feb
overpass9–13-0.0635%4 Feb
overpass16–13-0.0220%4 Feb
dust210–13-0.0414%3 Feb
ancient16–14-0.0216%2 Feb
dust213–11-0.0617%2 Feb
dust211–130.0126%2 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0422%1 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0111%1 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0429%1 Feb
train13–50.028%1 Feb
dust26–13-0.0621%31 Jan
overpass13–80.0018%31 Jan
inferno12–12-0.0215%31 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →