Kyle 1.0 (58.3 aim)

Kyle 1.0 (58.3 aim) — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198305567139[U:1:345301411]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,508Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,302Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating20,350Pink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5512 of 12722 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band median
Headshot rate38.9%48.1%
Shot accuracy18.3%12.9%
Kill/death ratio1.301.08
Match win rate35.9%46.5%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKyle 1.0 (58.3 aim)PREMIER20,350 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning46
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWLLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression4.2
Utility5.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time517ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — anubis 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 10ancientWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC29121741%-0.02
cacheB20101050%0.00
ancientD123925%-0.01
infernoS108280%0.00
nukeB84450%-0.00
dust2A74357%0.00
anubisA74357%0.01
overpass32167%0.00
alpine21150%0.05
train110100%-0.00
debris1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

131,694Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 25% of Pink band
5,493Matches
35.9%Match win rate
38.9%Headshot %
18.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band
10,193MVPs
2,092Hours (in match)
4,827Bombs planted
1,293Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,699
AWP18,740
P2504,430
MAC-102,808
MP92,597
FAMAS2,087

Lifetime map wins

6,267inferno
3,758dust2
3,383vertigo
3,245train
2,898nuke
313cbble
119office
92lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
67.0%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
508msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
6.33HE damage / grenade
9.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1397% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–14-0.0224%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.0427%27 Aug
ancient11–130.019%27 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0616%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0619%26 Aug
train13–3-0.0015%26 Aug
mirage5–130.0119%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0323%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0419%24 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0023%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.029%23 Aug
cache15–150.0122%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0516%23 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0114%23 Aug
cache9–130.0720%23 Aug
mirage13–11-0.047%18 Aug
anubis13–30.0911%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.058%5 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0026%5 Aug
dust216–13-0.0416%4 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0920%4 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0115%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0124%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0912%30 Jul
ancient7–13-0.009%29 Jul
anubis13–70.067%29 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0224%29 Jul
nuke13–80.0322%27 Jul
anubis13–30.1014%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0611%26 Jul
nuke13–110.0122%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0114%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0211%26 Jul
cache6–130.0014%26 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0323%26 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0317%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0050%26 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0624%26 Jul
ancient13–50.0214%23 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0514%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0125%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0513%21 Jul
mirage3–130.0023%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0314%21 Jul
dust213–8-0.0211%21 Jul
cache14–16-0.0326%20 Jul
ancient7–130.0516%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0911%20 Jul
debris5–9-0.0426%20 Jul
ancient13–50.009%19 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0112%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0330%19 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0910%15 Jul
cache13–8-0.0012%15 Jul
cache13–16-0.067%15 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0512%15 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0117%14 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0113%14 Jul
cache13–9-0.0511%14 Jul
nuke13–30.0125%14 Jul
cache13–4-0.084%13 Jul
anubis13–70.029%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0015%13 Jul
mirage13–90.0116%13 Jul
dust211–130.0610%13 Jul
alpine13–30.0822%8 Jul
mirage13–10.0113%8 Jul
mirage13–90.0112%5 Jul
cache8–13-0.0118%1 Jul
overpass13–4-0.029%30 Jun
ancient9–13-0.027%26 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0618%26 Jun
cache2–130.0517%25 Jun
ancient13–110.0913%25 Jun
nuke13–10.0722%22 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0619%21 Jun
dust213–90.0217%21 Jun
cache13–50.0418%21 Jun
mirage7–130.0414%21 Jun
inferno13–90.0519%19 Jun
cache13–80.0222%19 Jun
alpine10–130.0111%17 Jun
cache12–120.0319%17 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0015%17 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0612%15 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0613%15 Jun
cache13–6-0.038%12 Jun
mirage13–80.1016%12 Jun
overpass13–50.0921%10 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0021%10 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0812%8 Jun
cache9–130.0123%8 Jun
cache13–40.0920%7 Jun
mirage13–40.0133%4 Jun
inferno13–50.0321%4 Jun
cache10–13-0.0224%3 Jun
cache13–4-0.0118%3 Jun
cache13–40.0214%2 Jun
inferno16–120.0211%2 Jun
dust213–40.0615%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →