Landiasse

Landiasse — CS2 Stats

76561198304945282[U:1:344679554]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,796Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,077 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,077 → 2,077
+2Tracked matches · now 1,796
0.0ppWin rate · 36.7% → 36.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 70 days played since 20 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

22,388Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,077Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2025-09-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,077
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 423 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLandiasseFACEITLevel 9 · 2,077 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,077csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning73
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −44ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.0
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning7.3
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time606ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 28 Apr
73%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 12 Sept
414msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · dust2, 24 Aug
13–1Biggest win · cache, 28 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 26mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2617965%0.02
dust2C2381535%0.00
nukeC2191243%0.02
overpassB105550%-0.01
ancientC73443%0.00
anubisD72529%0.00
mirageD51420%0.04
cache110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,695Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
76.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust224246%1.0415.4
Inferno17255%1.1316.0
Nuke9048%1.0817.4
Overpass8357%1.1316.4
Mirage8051%1.0315.5
Ancient7454%1.0916.2
Anubis7142%1.0715.8
Train2540%0.8914.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
599msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
64.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
10.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8054% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust214–16-0.0218%16 Sept
nuke3–130.0073%12 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0223%25 Aug
nuke8–130.0716%25 Aug
nuke16–130.0515%24 Aug
dust213–7-0.0028%24 Aug
inferno13–60.0326%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.039%16 Aug
cache13–10.0721%28 Jul
mirage5–130.0118%28 Jul
dust21–13-0.0213%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0026%5 Jul
mirage8–130.0227%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0011%28 Jun
nuke8–130.0713%23 Jun
dust213–60.0328%25 May
overpass8–80.0223%24 May
inferno13–8-0.0325%20 May
dust28–130.2043%18 May
ancient13–160.0126%12 May
ancient8–13-0.0212%12 May
anubis5–13-0.0521%12 May
inferno13–10-0.0428%29 Apr
inferno13–80.2434%28 Apr
nuke8–80.0528%24 Apr
mirage13–30.1622%24 Apr
inferno13–80.1044%23 Apr
inferno10–130.1632%21 Apr
nuke13–100.0937%20 Apr
dust25–13-0.0213%19 Apr
nuke5–130.0345%19 Apr
nuke9–50.1218%17 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0715%14 Apr
overpass14–16-0.0515%12 Apr
inferno8–80.0338%10 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0213%5 Apr
inferno19–17-0.0127%4 Apr
inferno13–60.0438%4 Apr
anubis4–13-0.047%4 Apr
dust28–130.0114%4 Apr
anubis13–30.0226%4 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0216%4 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0317%4 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0026%2 Apr
dust24–13-0.0141%28 Mar
overpass19–170.0322%23 Mar
dust213–16-0.0116%20 Mar
dust210–130.0538%20 Mar
dust211–13-0.0423%18 Mar
nuke9–130.0621%16 Mar
dust211–130.0120%15 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0628%14 Mar
nuke9–130.0223%12 Mar
inferno13–80.0210%7 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0319%7 Mar
dust213–7-0.0714%7 Mar
dust213–90.0328%2 Mar
dust28–13-0.0823%1 Mar
anubis13–110.0820%1 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0327%1 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0216%21 Feb
anubis5–130.0418%21 Feb
inferno16–140.0115%16 Feb
dust213–100.0116%13 Feb
inferno5–130.067%10 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0120%6 Feb
dust213–110.0523%5 Feb
anubis12–160.0122%24 Jan
inferno16–12-0.0021%23 Jan
ancient7–2-0.0038%23 Jan
dust213–110.0122%22 Jan
nuke13–110.0125%10 Jan
ancient13–50.0325%10 Jan
inferno13–2-0.0111%8 Jan
overpass13–20.0810%29 Dec
dust210–13-0.0218%29 Dec
dust213–9-0.0023%21 Dec
nuke13–110.0525%14 Nov
inferno16–13-0.0216%1 Nov
dust29–13-0.0015%1 Nov
overpass4–13-0.0821%1 Nov
inferno10–13-0.0331%29 Oct
inferno25–22-0.0015%25 Oct
inferno13–16-0.049%19 Oct
nuke16–12-0.0123%18 Oct
inferno13–100.0319%18 Oct
overpass8–13-0.0424%17 Oct
overpass3–13-0.0711%17 Oct
inferno13–7-0.0233%11 Oct
inferno13–60.0421%7 Oct
overpass16–130.0419%4 Oct
ancient3–130.0725%4 Oct
nuke13–110.0519%3 Oct
nuke10–13-0.0614%1 Oct
inferno13–8-0.0224%27 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0119%26 Sept
nuke13–100.0214%26 Sept
ancient22–19-0.0118%24 Sept
dust214–160.0222%22 Sept
nuke4–13-0.1015%20 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →