Larmis

Larmis — CS2 Stats

76561198303375647[U:1:343109919]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,655Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating19,643Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80110 of 225452 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 955 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+533Premier CS Rating · 19,110 → 19,643
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 16 days played since 31 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,643 +4,027 31 Aug18 Sept · 17 days played
15,48319,683peak 19,68331 Aug18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 955 +0 2 Sept9 Sept · 3 observations
955955peak 9552 Sept9 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
955Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
16Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 955
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 40 below peak (19,683)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 357 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLarmisFACEITLevel 5 · 955 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,643 · Purple bandPEAK ELO955csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning48
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +7.9pp headshot accuracy · +103ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility5.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch6.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time626ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 1 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 15–15 · ancient, 1 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · mirage, 6 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 14cacheWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B30151550%-0.01
mirageA27151256%0.01
ancientB157847%-0.01
infernoA149564%-0.01
cacheD61517%-0.01
anubisD62433%-0.02
nuke21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

258Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
67.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2945%1.0113.6
Dust22458%0.9515.1
Inferno1362%1.0016.4
Ancient838%0.8412.4
Cache560%1.2412.6
Nuke30%0.7011.7
Anubis3100%1.7415.3
Overpass250%0.4611.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
644msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
32.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
10.24HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.6187% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0121%18 Sept
dust213–50.0824%18 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0728%18 Sept
mirage13–110.0119%17 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0625%17 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0431%17 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0331%17 Sept
dust29–130.0327%17 Sept
inferno16–12-0.0021%17 Sept
ancient13–60.0326%17 Sept
dust211–13-0.0025%17 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0122%16 Sept
ancient8–130.0312%16 Sept
dust24–1-0.060%16 Sept
mirage0–13-0.0319%16 Sept
cache6–13-0.0416%16 Sept
mirage13–110.0317%16 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0220%16 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0318%16 Sept
dust29–13-0.0425%16 Sept
ancient8–13-0.1313%16 Sept
inferno16–130.0022%16 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0016%15 Sept
dust213–80.0633%15 Sept
mirage16–130.0222%15 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0529%15 Sept
dust213–6-0.0126%15 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0120%14 Sept
dust213–16-0.0218%14 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0140%14 Sept
mirage11–130.0419%14 Sept
dust213–100.0523%14 Sept
dust213–70.0232%14 Sept
anubis9–130.0314%14 Sept
anubis13–110.0635%14 Sept
mirage13–50.0714%14 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0117%13 Sept
dust213–30.1024%13 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0114%13 Sept
dust213–11-0.0224%13 Sept
ancient13–70.0126%13 Sept
mirage9–130.0033%13 Sept
inferno16–140.0425%13 Sept
cache13–90.0227%13 Sept
dust25–13-0.0523%12 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0516%12 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0226%12 Sept
inferno5–130.0124%12 Sept
dust213–70.0121%12 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0320%12 Sept
dust213–9-0.0111%11 Sept
dust213–30.0022%11 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0723%11 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0215%11 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0135%11 Sept
dust25–13-0.0612%11 Sept
inferno13–50.0430%10 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0331%10 Sept
cache4–13-0.0210%9 Sept
ancient13–100.0416%9 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0219%9 Sept
cache5–13-0.0214%8 Sept
inferno13–80.0016%7 Sept
cache9–13-0.0514%7 Sept
mirage7–130.0320%7 Sept
inferno16–12-0.0124%7 Sept
mirage11–130.0412%7 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0820%7 Sept
mirage13–00.0716%6 Sept
dust213–50.0123%6 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0322%6 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0219%6 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0223%6 Sept
dust23–13-0.0413%6 Sept
dust215–150.0636%6 Sept
dust27–13-0.0512%4 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0711%4 Sept
dust213–9-0.0523%4 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0523%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0224%1 Sept
dust213–8-0.0125%1 Sept
ancient8–3-0.0233%1 Sept
dust213–10-0.0517%1 Sept
ancient15–150.0144%1 Sept
mirage13–70.0621%1 Sept
mirage13–10.1133%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.0437%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.0131%1 Sept
mirage10–130.0320%1 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0625%1 Sept
mirage13–70.018%31 Aug
dust21–13-0.0517%31 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0518%31 Aug
dust26–13-0.0028%31 Aug
dust210–13-0.0328%31 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0324%31 Aug
cache9–130.0217%31 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0120%31 Aug
dust23–13-0.079%31 Aug
mirage13–80.0324%31 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →