Larmis

Larmis — CS2 Stats

76561198303375647[U:1:343109919]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,845Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,250Purple band · top ~15.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 955 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−483Premier CS Rating · 18,733 → 18,250

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,250 +2,040 2 Sept – 17 Oct · 18 days played
15,48319,643peak 19,6432 Sept17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 955 +0 2 Sept – 18 Sept · 4 observations
955955peak 9552 Sept18 Sept
19,643Peak Premier in tracked matches
955Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
14Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 955
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,393 below peak (19,643)
  • -1,393 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,750 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLarmisFACEITLevel 5 · 955 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,250 · Purple bandPEAK ELO955csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 676ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 687ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch5.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time671ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 671ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 2 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · dust2, 16 Oct →
469msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · mirage, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 12 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 25anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2515–1060%0.03
mirageA1911–858%0.02
ancientC146–843%0.01
infernoB136–746%-0.01
nukeA106–460%-0.02
cacheB105–550%-0.01
anubisD93–633%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

265Matches
49%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
68.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3043%1.0113.6
Dust22857%0.9615.0
Inferno1362%1.0016.4
Ancient838%0.8412.4
Cache560%1.2412.6
Anubis580%1.4015.8
Nuke30%0.7011.7
Overpass250%0.4611.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
676msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
12.32HE damage / grenade
8.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.4582% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0231%17 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0110%17 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0217%17 Oct →
mirage13–70.0513%17 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0016%17 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0521%17 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0120%16 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0131%16 Oct →
dust22–90.0643%16 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0218%16 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0636%16 Oct →
cache13–80.0526%16 Oct →
cache13–80.0014%16 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0322%16 Oct →
nuke13–80.0230%15 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0712%15 Oct →
cache13–100.0421%15 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0017%15 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0219%14 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0322%14 Oct →
inferno13–110.0323%14 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0126%14 Oct →
mirage13–80.0213%14 Oct →
mirage16–140.0518%14 Oct →
dust213–80.0024%14 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0131%14 Oct →
dust213–40.0728%14 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0316%14 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0713%13 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0228%13 Oct →
anubis13–50.049%13 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0723%13 Oct →
ancient15–150.0019%13 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.058%13 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0217%13 Oct →
dust213–110.0725%13 Oct →
ancient7–130.0323%12 Oct →
ancient13–80.1015%12 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0021%12 Oct →
inferno13–10.1028%12 Oct →
dust25–130.0523%11 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0011%10 Oct →
ancient13–20.0212%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.1014%10 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0221%10 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0126%10 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0020%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0411%10 Oct →
dust213–100.0420%10 Oct →
mirage13–90.0622%10 Oct →
mirage13–160.0024%10 Oct →
mirage13–20.1514%9 Oct →
dust210–130.0015%9 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0715%9 Oct →
nuke13–90.0020%9 Oct →
dust216–120.0217%8 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0220%8 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0328%8 Oct →
cache4–13-0.037%8 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0316%3 Oct →
dust213–60.0337%3 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0623%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0911%3 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.053%3 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.0811%3 Oct →
inferno9–130.0020%3 Oct →
dust213–90.026%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0117%3 Oct →
anubis0–9-0.0715%3 Oct →
dust210–130.0529%3 Oct →
dust210–130.0120%2 Oct →
dust26–130.0113%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0821%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0815%2 Oct →
dust213–80.1815%2 Oct →
mirage3–130.0525%2 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0123%2 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.027%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0220%2 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0212%2 Oct →
inferno13–70.0114%2 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0119%2 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0620%2 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0025%1 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0126%1 Oct →
anubis13–40.0919%1 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0024%1 Oct →
nuke13–110.059%1 Oct →
mirage13–40.0513%1 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0324%1 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0313%30 Sept →
ancient13–80.1123%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0124%30 Sept →
ancient11–130.0519%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0716%30 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0520%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0218%30 Sept →
dust24–130.0216%30 Sept →
mirage5–130.0443%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0224%30 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.