Smuds

Smuds — CS2 Stats

CA76561198299915429[U:1:339649701]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,016Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,529Blue band · top ~46.8% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−52Premier CS Rating · 11,581 → 11,529

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,529 +3,020 9 Aug – 3 Oct · 21 days played
8,50912,190peak 12,1909 Aug3 Oct
12,494Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-07-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 661 below peak (12,190)
  • +1,002 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,471 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSmudsPREMIER11,529 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning40
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.1
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time575ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 16–13 · nuke, 4 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 4 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 2 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2614–1254%-0.01
mirageA2112–957%-0.02
nukeC207–1335%-0.01
anubisD81–713%-0.02
infernoA85–363%-0.01
ancientC83–538%-0.01
cacheC73–443%-0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.14
overpass—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
44%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
53.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage729%0.8014.9
Cache450%0.7111.0
Dust2367%0.698.7
Inferno20%0.5510.0
Vertigo2100%0.446.5
Nuke10%0.447.0
Anubis10%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.5%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
576msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
26.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.23HE damage / grenade
17.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.299% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.0511%3 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0121%3 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0322%3 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.1018%3 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0121%3 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0310%3 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0129%2 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0421%2 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0323%2 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0520%29 Sept →
vertigo8–8-0.1427%29 Sept →
overpass9–20.0522%29 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0510%29 Sept →
dust213–8-0.058%29 Sept →
mirage9–130.0423%29 Sept →
mirage5–130.0129%28 Sept →
inferno13–40.0215%28 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0512%28 Sept →
ancient13–70.0015%27 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0713%27 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0522%27 Sept →
mirage13–50.0432%27 Sept →
mirage13–30.0122%26 Sept →
anubis13–80.0128%26 Sept →
dust213–50.0124%26 Sept →
inferno13–40.0119%26 Sept →
ancient13–30.1026%26 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0111%26 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0132%26 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0524%26 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.0220%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.1117%26 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0819%23 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0430%22 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0422%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0711%21 Sept →
inferno8–130.0516%21 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0018%21 Sept →
mirage13–80.0320%21 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0421%21 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0024%21 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0218%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.1123%14 Sept →
dust23–130.0617%7 Sept →
nuke13–10.1023%7 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0427%7 Sept →
nuke6–130.0324%7 Sept →
dust213–90.0225%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0532%7 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0618%7 Sept →
cache3–130.0320%7 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0224%6 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0423%6 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.038%6 Sept →
dust211–130.0017%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0415%4 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0031%4 Sept →
nuke16–130.1320%4 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0126%4 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0140%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0030%2 Sept →
nuke16–120.0116%2 Sept →
cache13–90.0120%1 Sept →
nuke8–130.1016%1 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0427%1 Sept →
cache13–70.0219%31 Aug →
inferno4–12-0.087%31 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.0521%23 Aug →
dust23–70.0138%23 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0913%23 Aug →
anubis12–120.0222%23 Aug →
dust26–20.056%23 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0622%23 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0017%23 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0112%15 Aug →
nuke13–110.0220%15 Aug →
dust213–20.0522%15 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0513%15 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0418%15 Aug →
dust26–130.0120%12 Aug →
dust213–60.0526%12 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0122%9 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0124%9 Aug →
mirage13–100.0116%9 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0718%8 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0725%8 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0133%8 Aug →
inferno7–130.0227%8 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0617%8 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0121%7 Aug →
mirage19–17-0.0723%30 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0238%29 Jul →
dust213–50.1018%29 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0820%29 Jul →
anubis13–160.0315%28 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0925%28 Jul →
cache13–90.0219%26 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0516%26 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0120%25 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0224%21 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.