❈𝖅𝖊𝖗𝖔❈ — CS2 Stats

MY76561198298414532[U:1:338148804]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,004Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating18,075Purple band · top ~16.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#96068 of 220679 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 13 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,075 +5,079 13 Aug – 16 Sept · 27 days played

19,164Peak Premier in tracked matches

27Days played since 2026-08-13

Premier CS Rating

1,089 below peak (19,164)
+5,360 over 30 days · improving
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,925 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning57

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateLWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

12–8 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.4

Utility5.1

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning5.7

Utility5.1

Mechanics5.4

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time528ms−17ms

first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%+4.5%

first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 28 Aug →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 4 Sept →

328msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 3 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 74% over 19infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	20	14–6	70%	0.01
ancient	S	19	14–5	74%	0.01
nuke	A	16	9–7	56%	0.02
inferno	C	16	6–10	38%	0.01
anubis	A	14	8–6	57%	0.01
dust2	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.00
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches

50%Win rate

0.69Avg K/D

68.9ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	1	0%	1.00	15.0
Mirage	1	100%	0.38	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

74.5%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

518msReaction time

49.7%T opening success

41.0%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

4.9%Flash assists

8.00HE damage / grenade

11.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.475 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	5–13	-0.08	5%	16 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	15%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.01	14%	16 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.05	23%	15 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.07	9%	15 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.03	47%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–3	0.12	31%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.05	29%	15 Sept →
nuke	5–7	-0.03	43%	15 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.01	12%	15 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.07	17%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–6	0.05	30%	15 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.02	18%	15 Sept →
dust2	5–13	0.05	44%	15 Sept →
dust2	12–16	0.04	22%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–4	0.10	14%	14 Sept →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	12%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.07	12%	13 Sept →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	30%	13 Sept →
cache	13–16	-0.02	16%	13 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	6%	13 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	15%	13 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.01	16%	12 Sept →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	27%	12 Sept →
ancient	10–3	-0.03	22%	12 Sept →
anubis	3–13	0.07	18%	12 Sept →
ancient	7–13	0.01	19%	10 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	27%	10 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.08	11%	9 Sept →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	15%	8 Sept →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	15%	8 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	40%	8 Sept →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	12%	8 Sept →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	9%	8 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	20%	8 Sept →
nuke	13–5	-0.04	14%	8 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	14%	8 Sept →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	23%	8 Sept →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	11%	7 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	9%	6 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.04	27%	6 Sept →
mirage	16–14	0.01	12%	6 Sept →
ancient	13–4	-0.04	14%	6 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.01	14%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	27%	5 Sept →
nuke	13–8	0.06	38%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.11	33%	5 Sept →
anubis	13–5	0.03	13%	4 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.05	19%	4 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.13	50%	4 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.07	19%	4 Sept →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	13%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.03	14%	3 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.06	22%	3 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.16	21%	3 Sept →
nuke	10–13	0.02	10%	2 Sept →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	14%	2 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.01	11%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–11	0.12	22%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.12	26%	1 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.02	28%	1 Sept →
nuke	13–16	0.01	13%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.04	7%	31 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	20%	31 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	25%	31 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	18%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.03	18%	30 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	43%	30 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.05	21%	29 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.04	22%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	15%	28 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	10%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	13%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.19	29%	28 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	21%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	23%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	11%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	19%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.09	6%	26 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	15%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.12	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	29%	26 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	20%	25 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.03	15%	25 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	7%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.03	8%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.00	6%	16 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	18%	16 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	5%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.03	7%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	19%	15 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	17%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	5%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.00	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	8%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	38%	13 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	18%	13 Aug →