xX_๐“œ๐“ก_Xx

xX_๐“œ๐“ก_Xx โ€” CS2 Stats

MY76561198179900465[U:1:219634737]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

4,793Tracked matches66%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,603Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band ยท top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53926 of 220687 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 ยท 953 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 3 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,603 +5,925 3 Aug โ€“ 16 Sept ยท 30 days played
15,40221,760peak 21,7603 Aug16 Sept
22,098Peak Premier in tracked matches
953Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak โ€” 953
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 โ€” 98 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 ยท Level 3 ยท Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 157 below peak (21,760)
  • +5,281 over 30 days ยท improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 โ€” 3,397 to go
  • Reached: Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDBโ€™s own observation โ€” no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxX_๐“œ๐“ก_XxFACEITLevel 5 ยท 953 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,603 ยท Pink bandPEAK ELO953csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning51
Utility25

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60โ€“38โ€“2Last 10060%Win rateLLWWWLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.02 avg rating ยท โˆ’1.8pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’96ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“4โ€“1 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

  • 12โ€“7โ€“1 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility2.5
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.1
Utility2.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.01
Reaction time562msโˆ’24ms
first โ…“ avg 585ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+2.2%
first โ…“ avg 15.2% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating ยท 13โ€“4 ยท dust2, 4 Aug โ†’
29%Best headshot accuracy ยท 0โ€“7 ยท dust2, 11 Sept โ†’
406msFastest reaction time ยท 13โ€“9 ยท anubis, 28 Aug โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท dust2, 9 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10โ€“7In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map ยท 82% over 17infernoWeakest map ยท 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2314โ€“961%-0.03
dust2B199โ€“1047%-0.03
anubisS1712โ€“571%-0.02
ancientS1714โ€“382%-0.01
infernoD124โ€“833%-0.01
nukeA106โ€“460%0.00
cacheโ€”21โ€“150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

108Matches
51%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
71.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22748%0.7112.2
Mirage2264%0.9013.9
Anubis2259%1.0013.3
Ancient1747%0.8513.8
Inferno1250%0.8813.3
Nuke617%0.7112.8
Overpass20%0.5210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
8.0ยฐPreaim
558msReaction time
41.5%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
8.61HE damage / grenade
2.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3908 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.7102% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy โ†’Inferno grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8โ€“13-0.0016%16 Sept โ†’
anubis5โ€“130.0419%16 Sept โ†’
dust216โ€“14-0.0511%16 Sept โ†’
mirage16โ€“13-0.0315%12 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0323%12 Sept โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.057%11 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“110.0116%11 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0515%11 Sept โ†’
dust20โ€“70.0229%11 Sept โ†’
dust212โ€“12-0.0418%9 Sept โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0322%9 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“130.0320%9 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“4-0.0417%3 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.088%29 Aug โ†’
mirage16โ€“14-0.0120%29 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0222%28 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“130.0223%28 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0010%28 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“3-0.0126%28 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0320%27 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0215%27 Aug โ†’
inferno3โ€“13-0.0119%27 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.0112%27 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.0219%26 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“3-0.0116%26 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“70.0727%26 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0711%26 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“100.0020%26 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0010%26 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0119%26 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0321%25 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0119%25 Aug โ†’
inferno15โ€“15-0.0213%25 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“5-0.0318%25 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0520%25 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0629%24 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“4-0.0414%24 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0121%24 Aug โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0411%23 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“4-0.0122%23 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“7-0.0214%23 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0117%23 Aug โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0716%22 Aug โ†’
anubis10โ€“13-0.0314%22 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“7-0.0010%22 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.038%22 Aug โ†’
dust214โ€“16-0.0721%21 Aug โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.1013%20 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“6-0.0121%20 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.039%20 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0215%19 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0812%18 Aug โ†’
anubis0โ€“13-0.0620%17 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0519%17 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0423%17 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0123%17 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“100.0015%17 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0410%16 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0127%15 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“10-0.0129%15 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0320%15 Aug โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.0220%15 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“80.0318%14 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“3-0.0020%14 Aug โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0322%14 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0119%14 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0423%14 Aug โ†’
inferno8โ€“130.0221%13 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“6-0.0311%13 Aug โ†’
nuke9โ€“13-0.0615%13 Aug โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0623%12 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.073%12 Aug โ†’
mirage16โ€“12-0.0311%10 Aug โ†’
inferno4โ€“13-0.0515%10 Aug โ†’
anubis2โ€“13-0.0110%9 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0414%9 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“1-0.0210%9 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.0413%9 Aug โ†’
dust214โ€“16-0.0317%8 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“70.0026%8 Aug โ†’
anubis3โ€“13-0.043%8 Aug โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.077%7 Aug โ†’
dust24โ€“13-0.0616%7 Aug โ†’
anubis16โ€“14-0.0421%7 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“13-0.0210%6 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“2-0.039%6 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“100.0426%6 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0014%6 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“160.0613%5 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“7-0.0524%5 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“13-0.0915%5 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0214%5 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0424%4 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“90.0116%4 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“40.1123%4 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“70.0616%4 Aug โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0111%4 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“40.0324%4 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.029%4 Aug โ†’
nuke12โ€“16-0.0521%3 Aug โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’