Gasgano

Gasgano — CS2 Stats

CN76561198295498830[U:1:335233102]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

554Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#58810 of 251956 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,549 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,649 +8,258 7 Jan – 21 Aug · 19 days played
13,39121,649peak 21,6497 Jan21 Aug
21,649Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,549Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-01-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,549
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 202 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGasganoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,549 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,549csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning45
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–47–9Last 10044%Win rateLLLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.1
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.5
Utility3.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time554ms−101ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 26 Jan →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · inferno, 4 Jul →
305msFastest reaction time · 0–9 · inferno, 5 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 28 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
10–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 85% over 13overpassWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2613–1350%0.01
infernoD154–1127%-0.02
dust2D144–1029%0.02
ancientS1311–285%0.01
nukeB115–645%0.01
overpassD82–625%0.03
anubisD62–433%0.01
cache—31–233%0.01
train—31–233%0.04
poseidon—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

114Matches
54%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
83.1ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2941%1.0715.1
Dust22475%1.0717.5
Ancient1850%0.9217.9
Inferno1233%0.9115.1
Nuke956%1.0515.2
Overpass683%1.0716.7
Anubis540%1.0317.6
Train4100%1.4720.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
583msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
7.96HE damage / grenade
1.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.2551 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2507% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0427%14 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0919%8 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.085%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0120%3 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0216%23 Sept →
ancient13–30.0621%21 Aug →
ancient13–100.0420%29 Jul →
cache6–130.0521%29 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.028%28 Jul →
ancient13–110.0513%26 Jul →
dust213–40.0519%26 Jul →
anubis10–130.0513%22 Jul →
train7–13-0.0424%20 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0218%17 Jul →
ancient13–100.0310%16 Jul →
dust27–13-0.024%16 Jul →
mirage13–50.1016%12 Jul →
mirage8–130.0423%12 Jul →
nuke13–80.0529%11 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0024%11 Jul →
cache2–11-0.0225%11 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0232%10 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0117%10 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0711%10 Jul →
cache13–80.0219%10 Jul →
ancient13–70.0213%10 Jul →
nuke1–9-0.0713%6 Jul →
overpass0–8-0.110%5 Jul →
inferno0–9-0.1829%5 Jul →
inferno8–80.1141%4 Jul →
inferno0–9-0.2433%4 Jul →
nuke0–9-0.127%4 Jul →
overpass3–9-0.029%4 Jul →
overpass4–9-0.0116%4 Jul →
overpass9–30.2326%4 Jul →
nuke7–90.0520%4 Jul →
nuke3–9-0.0219%4 Jul →
inferno2–90.0237%3 Jul →
nuke8–80.1526%3 Jul →
ancient13–110.0121%3 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0120%3 Jul →
dust28–130.0219%2 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0131%2 Jul →
dust213–40.0321%2 Jul →
dust212–120.0517%30 Jun →
mirage8–130.0116%29 Jun →
mirage13–110.0322%29 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0417%28 Jun →
dust215–150.0619%28 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.0529%28 Jun →
overpass4–13-0.0310%28 Jun →
mirage4–130.0222%14 Jun →
mirage13–40.0021%8 May →
train12–120.1332%24 Apr →
inferno0–10-0.0429%24 Apr →
dust212–120.0513%20 Apr →
inferno12–120.0327%20 Apr →
poseidon9–50.0934%11 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0825%6 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0315%6 Feb →
dust216–130.0334%5 Feb →
mirage12–16-0.0417%2 Feb →
ancient16–14-0.0122%2 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0326%29 Jan →
inferno13–110.0417%29 Jan →
overpass9–13-0.0215%27 Jan →
ancient13–60.0325%27 Jan →
mirage13–60.0131%27 Jan →
dust213–40.0414%27 Jan →
nuke13–11-0.0016%26 Jan →
mirage13–80.2519%26 Jan →
mirage8–20.2020%26 Jan →
anubis13–60.0218%25 Jan →
mirage5–13-0.0514%25 Jan →
mirage15–15-0.058%25 Jan →
overpass13–40.2018%24 Jan →
dust25–130.0333%24 Jan →
ancient13–70.0020%23 Jan →
nuke13–70.0724%23 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0229%22 Jan →
mirage13–8-0.0317%22 Jan →
anubis5–130.0422%22 Jan →
anubis13–110.0111%22 Jan →
dust29–13-0.0510%22 Jan →
mirage7–130.0215%22 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.0310%21 Jan →
inferno13–110.0222%18 Jan →
inferno9–130.0032%13 Jan →
nuke13–30.1129%13 Jan →
overpass3–120.0216%11 Jan →
mirage13–60.0721%10 Jan →
nuke13–9-0.0616%10 Jan →
mirage13–9-0.0221%9 Jan →
dust27–130.0921%9 Jan →
mirage7–130.0625%9 Jan →
train13–70.0530%9 Jan →
inferno16–140.0222%8 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0211%7 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0433%6 Jan →
ancient13–110.0514%4 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.