Bambosh

Bambosh — CS2 Stats

PROALGO EsportsPolandRiflerSettings & gear profile →

PL76561198284027458[U:1:323761730]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,142Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 203,257 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21333 of 250440 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,308 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 5,142 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 -921 25 Apr – 23 Sept · 10 days played
24,92025,920peak 25,92025 Apr23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,308 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 observations
3,3083,308peak 3,30829 Aug23 Sept
25,920Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,308Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-02-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,308
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 192 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 921 below peak (25,920)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBamboshFACEITLevel 10 · 3,308 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,308csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning49
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–52Last 10048%Win rateWWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · +4.3pp headshot accuracy · −60ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 438ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.9
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time510ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 8–0 · eldorado, 26 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 25 Apr →
281msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 6 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 21 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11overpassWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC229–1341%0.02
nukeA2011–955%0.01
ancientA1610–663%0.02
anubisD112–918%-0.02
infernoS118–373%-0.01
dust2C114–736%0.02
overpassD61–517%-0.02
debris—11–0100%0.18
eldorado—11–0100%0.22
cache—11–0100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,028Matches
55%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
88.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage72358%1.2218.0
Ancient63458%1.2218.6
Anubis34052%1.1717.8
Nuke23658%1.2217.8
Vertigo17369%1.3219.2
Dust213851%1.0716.6
Inferno4747%1.2917.6
Train4753%1.1615.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$1,693Inventory value39ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Karambit | Lore (Field-Tested)$1,035★ Specialist Gloves | Lt. Commander (Minimal Wear)$338Desert Eagle | Printstream (Minimal Wear)$72StatTrak™ AK-47 | Legion of Anubis (Minimal Wear)$69USP-S | Printstream (Well-Worn)$54USP-S | Monster Mashup (Field-Tested)$32

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
521msReaction time
18.2%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.63HE damage / grenade
8.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4615 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.1633% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
debris9–60.1833%26 Aug →
eldorado8–00.2236%26 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0020%21 Aug →
mirage13–60.0530%19 Aug →
overpass8–13-0.0617%30 May →
mirage10–13-0.0329%30 May →
nuke11–130.0740%29 May →
mirage13–11-0.0431%29 May →
ancient10–13-0.0117%27 May →
ancient13–60.1419%27 May →
inferno13–8-0.0326%27 May →
nuke13–70.0529%26 May →
overpass13–10-0.0122%26 May →
dust214–16-0.0315%25 May →
ancient9–130.0119%25 May →
anubis8–13-0.068%25 May →
nuke13–50.0326%25 May →
inferno13–6-0.0521%25 May →
mirage6–13-0.0338%25 May →
ancient6–13-0.0224%24 May →
mirage12–16-0.0415%24 May →
nuke19–17-0.0020%24 May →
anubis13–16-0.0127%23 May →
inferno8–13-0.0616%23 May →
anubis5–13-0.0918%23 May →
inferno13–110.0329%22 May →
ancient13–11-0.0224%21 May →
anubis13–16-0.0511%21 May →
inferno13–8-0.0115%21 May →
inferno13–10.0629%21 May →
nuke13–9-0.0525%21 May →
anubis11–130.0018%20 May →
mirage6–13-0.0523%20 May →
inferno13–80.0219%20 May →
inferno9–13-0.0326%19 May →
nuke2–13-0.0521%19 May →
nuke16–13-0.0423%18 May →
anubis13–10-0.0525%18 May →
overpass6–13-0.0513%8 May →
anubis12–160.0433%8 May →
cache13–100.1232%4 May →
mirage13–50.1625%4 May →
inferno13–9-0.0113%4 May →
anubis9–13-0.0717%4 May →
nuke13–6-0.0327%4 May →
inferno1–12-0.0129%3 May →
mirage10–13-0.0324%1 May →
overpass7–13-0.0918%1 May →
nuke10–13-0.0426%30 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0024%30 Apr →
ancient13–20.0435%25 Apr →
dust210–130.0650%25 Apr →
dust213–100.2033%24 Apr →
mirage9–130.1433%23 Apr →
ancient16–130.0522%22 Apr →
dust210–130.1131%6 Apr →
mirage13–80.0633%3 Apr →
dust213–60.0524%3 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0221%2 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0824%31 Mar →
nuke3–130.0114%31 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0223%29 Mar →
dust214–16-0.0336%29 Mar →
nuke13–100.0328%28 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0215%27 Mar →
mirage13–70.0325%27 Mar →
anubis13–20.0322%26 Mar →
ancient19–16-0.0116%21 Mar →
overpass9–130.0632%21 Mar →
nuke13–110.0420%21 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0331%20 Mar →
mirage13–60.0714%19 Mar →
ancient13–90.0927%10 Mar →
mirage13–80.0224%10 Mar →
nuke10–130.0327%6 Mar →
dust20–13-0.0716%6 Mar →
nuke10–13-0.0516%4 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0416%4 Mar →
mirage6–130.0529%4 Mar →
overpass9–130.0122%2 Mar →
nuke8–130.0636%2 Mar →
ancient13–70.0314%1 Mar →
mirage11–130.0017%1 Mar →
nuke7–130.0221%1 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0424%1 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0325%26 Feb →
ancient1–13-0.0723%26 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0514%26 Feb →
nuke6–130.0228%23 Feb →
inferno13–70.0216%23 Feb →
ancient13–70.0827%22 Feb →
mirage13–70.0429%22 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0137%22 Feb →
mirage13–90.0438%20 Feb →
ancient13–60.0825%18 Feb →
nuke13–100.0329%16 Feb →
mirage6–130.1118%16 Feb →
ancient13–40.0319%6 Feb →
nuke12–40.0538%6 Feb →
mirage8–130.0220%6 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.