D3aTroniX

D3aTroniX — CS2 Stats

DE76561198278904791[U:1:318639063]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,348Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,333Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 2,348
+3.6ppWin rate · 42.9% → 46.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,839 -2,263 21 May – 11 Jul · 11 days played
22,45826,098peak 26,09821 May11 Jul
26,397Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-05-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches6——
Win rate100%——
K/D2.22——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 27 Sep 2026 → 6 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches11——
Win rate55%——
K/D1.51——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 6 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate55.3%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy16.3%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.751.061.07above
Match win rate50.0%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGD3aTroniXFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning62
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateWWLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.3
Utility5.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time527ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 533ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–1 · boulder, 10 Jul →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 23 May →
359msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · vertigo, 18 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 10 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 36% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2810–1836%0.02
cacheA2011–955%0.04
infernoB126–650%0.05
mirageC114–736%-0.02
nukeA95–456%0.03
ancientS65–183%0.05
anubis—42–250%0.04
shelter—20–20%-0.00
fachwerk—21–150%0.01
boulder—21–150%0.13
vertigo—21–150%0.02
office—10–10%0.00
overpass—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

377,466Lifetime kills
1.75K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
11,137Matches
50.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
55.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
41,685MVPs
4,515Hours (in match)
10,409Bombs planted
1,992Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47121,282
AWP44,641
Glock-1811,442
SSG 087,253
FAMAS4,493
UMP-453,718

Lifetime map wins

29,634dust2
11,441inferno
3,897vertigo
3,650nuke
1,903cbble
1,352train
897office
94italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

539Matches
52%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
90.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2152%0.8913.9
Anubis1856%1.0918.2
Inferno1450%0.9316.4
Ancient1457%0.9413.9
Vertigo1155%0.9615.6
Nuke850%1.0617.8
Dust2560%1.2416.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
522msReaction time
43.8%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.07HE damage / grenade
7.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.1118%29 Sept →
nuke13–70.0715%29 Sept →
nuke9–130.0233%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.1013%24 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0213%21 Sept →
cache8–130.0123%12 Sept →
shelter10–13-0.0527%25 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0520%25 Jul →
office9–130.0028%25 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0316%25 Jul →
ancient13–40.0234%25 Jul →
fachwerk2–13-0.0624%25 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0212%25 Jul →
nuke13–90.0624%19 Jul →
boulder12–120.0225%19 Jul →
dust213–30.0718%19 Jul →
vertigo7–13-0.0126%18 Jul →
ancient13–40.0822%18 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0013%18 Jul →
dust26–130.0417%18 Jul →
nuke13–50.1118%18 Jul →
cache13–90.0118%18 Jul →
cache13–110.0319%11 Jul →
dust210–130.0726%10 Jul →
anubis11–130.1721%10 Jul →
ancient12–120.1513%10 Jul →
vertigo13–70.0515%10 Jul →
inferno8–130.0719%10 Jul →
dust213–110.2028%10 Jul →
boulder13–10.2421%10 Jul →
fachwerk13–70.0826%10 Jul →
shelter6–130.0526%10 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0224%10 Jul →
cache13–100.1019%10 Jul →
ancient13–90.0321%10 Jul →
dust29–130.0420%9 Jul →
anubis13–70.0216%9 Jul →
dust213–160.0313%9 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0211%9 Jul →
dust26–130.0120%9 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0212%9 Jul →
mirage1–10-0.0223%9 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0317%9 Jul →
mirage13–100.0217%9 Jul →
dust213–30.0218%9 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0417%9 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0423%9 Jul →
anubis13–50.0322%9 Jul →
dust24–130.0318%9 Jul →
inferno13–10.0715%9 Jul →
dust212–120.1222%8 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0419%6 Jul →
dust21–13-0.1213%6 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0621%5 Jul →
inferno7–130.0425%5 Jul →
dust213–100.1020%4 Jul →
inferno3–130.0422%4 Jul →
cache13–70.0516%24 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0329%24 Jun →
dust210–130.0516%21 Jun →
cache5–130.0222%21 Jun →
inferno13–30.0120%20 Jun →
dust215–150.0133%20 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0625%20 Jun →
cache5–130.0319%20 Jun →
cache1–13-0.0326%13 Jun →
inferno12–120.0919%13 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0124%13 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0218%10 Jun →
dust210–130.0918%10 Jun →
inferno13–00.1127%10 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0025%10 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0419%10 Jun →
cache13–80.0428%9 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0014%9 Jun →
dust211–3-0.0215%9 Jun →
ancient13–110.0111%9 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0128%4 Jun →
cache7–130.0527%4 Jun →
nuke13–90.0721%4 Jun →
cache13–70.1316%4 Jun →
dust26–130.0021%31 May →
inferno9–13-0.0113%31 May →
dust216–140.0318%31 May →
cache13–20.0425%26 May →
dust29–13-0.0322%24 May →
nuke8–13-0.0714%23 May →
ancient13–110.0018%23 May →
dust29–130.0827%23 May →
nuke12–120.0933%23 May →
nuke13–80.0015%23 May →
inferno6–40.0518%23 May →
cache13–60.1826%23 May →
cache13–80.0952%23 May →
cache13–70.0432%22 May →
inferno11–130.0429%22 May →
overpass13–50.0723%22 May →
cache13–110.0220%22 May →
mirage13–50.0717%21 May →
inferno13–70.0432%21 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.