jorge de guzman

jorge de guzman — CS2 Stats

76561198278374034[U:1:318108306]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,063Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 211,494 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22854 of 258654 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 955 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +3,461 30 May – 27 Oct · 16 days played
21,20625,626peak 25,62630 May27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 955 +0 3 Sept – 24 Sept · 2 observations
955955peak 9553 Sept24 Sept
25,626Peak Premier in tracked matches
955Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 955
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 627 below peak (25,626)
  • +321 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjorge de guzmanFACEITLevel 8 · 955 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandPEAK ELO955csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning59
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWLWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time487ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 487ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 11 Aug →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · nuke, 26 Oct →
320msFastest reaction time · 4–1 · dust2, 22 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 14cacheWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3522–1363%0.02
mirageA2112–957%-0.00
cacheC156–940%0.00
infernoA149–564%0.01
ancientB84–450%0.02
nuke—30–30%-0.02
anubis—31–233%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
54%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
84.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25860%1.3015.8
Mirage4661%1.3415.9
Inferno2343%1.2215.7
Ancient1346%1.3815.0
Cache1250%1.2116.4
Anubis862%1.6218.8
Nuke450%1.7422.5
Overpass10%1.4725.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
484msReaction time
48.2%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
13.47HE damage / grenade
7.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4886 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–6-0.069%27 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0456%26 Oct →
cache13–110.0419%26 Oct →
inferno13–30.0429%26 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0919%26 Oct →
mirage6–130.0523%25 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0020%25 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0115%24 Oct →
inferno13–80.0520%24 Oct →
dust213–60.059%29 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0222%29 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0136%28 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0324%28 Sept →
dust213–80.018%28 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0212%27 Sept →
dust213–40.1021%27 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0243%26 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0316%23 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0524%23 Sept →
inferno13–70.0919%22 Sept →
nuke0–50.0220%21 Sept →
dust213–30.0829%20 Sept →
cache13–00.0833%20 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0514%19 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0415%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0127%19 Sept →
mirage6–130.0513%13 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0710%12 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0216%12 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0616%12 Sept →
mirage5–130.0126%12 Sept →
dust213–80.0327%10 Sept →
ancient13–160.0218%10 Sept →
dust213–80.0712%10 Sept →
mirage13–110.0117%9 Sept →
cache15–150.0130%8 Sept →
mirage13–70.0222%6 Sept →
ancient13–110.0424%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0418%5 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0838%5 Sept →
dust212–120.0015%5 Sept →
dust213–30.0610%5 Sept →
inferno13–80.0135%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0718%1 Sept →
mirage10–130.0826%1 Sept →
dust213–20.0739%31 Aug →
dust213–60.0623%31 Aug →
dust212–120.0321%30 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0119%26 Aug →
dust213–40.0123%26 Aug →
inferno13–2-0.0114%26 Aug →
dust213–30.0916%25 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0014%25 Aug →
ancient13–90.026%25 Aug →
vertigo16–120.0414%24 Aug →
dust213–90.0211%24 Aug →
ancient12–160.0017%24 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0430%24 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0118%23 Aug →
inferno13–90.0414%23 Aug →
mirage13–60.0121%23 Aug →
mirage13–90.0116%23 Aug →
cache11–130.007%22 Aug →
mirage11–130.0917%22 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0211%22 Aug →
dust24–10.0530%22 Aug →
dust213–90.0524%18 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0911%18 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0118%17 Aug →
ancient4–130.0123%17 Aug →
dust23–130.0314%15 Aug →
dust219–170.0115%12 Aug →
dust213–110.1321%11 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0317%11 Aug →
dust211–130.0925%11 Aug →
dust213–40.0613%9 Aug →
inferno13–90.0413%9 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0910%25 Jul →
dust213–90.0614%25 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0213%25 Jul →
cache13–30.0726%19 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0612%7 Jul →
ancient13–80.0624%4 Jul →
dust28–130.0926%4 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0427%4 Jul →
mirage16–14-0.0123%4 Jul →
mirage13–100.0339%4 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0111%7 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0223%7 Jun →
dust29–130.1012%6 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0329%6 Jun →
ancient10–130.0220%4 Jun →
dust213–2-0.0224%4 Jun →
cache13–60.0420%31 May →
mirage2–13-0.0710%31 May →
dust25–13-0.0527%31 May →
inferno11–10.0624%31 May →
cache9–13-0.0213%31 May →
cache9–130.0123%30 May →
inferno13–160.0123%30 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.