Antho

Antho — CS2 Stats

FR76561198277133768[U:1:316868040]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

773Tracked matches33%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,263Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 773 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 26 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 -652 30 Jan8 Sept · 34 days played
14,63016,878peak 16,87830 Jan8 Sept
16,878Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-01-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,878 below peak (16,878)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate56.7%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy9.3%12.7%13.0%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.301.051.06above
Match win rate47.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnthoFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning46
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44542Last 10044%Win rateLWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 689ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.8
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time634ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy30.9%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 29.8% → last ⅓ avg 30.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 31 Mar
63%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · anubis, 29 Mar
477msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · dust2, 12 Feb
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 14infernoWeakest map · 35% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2691735%-0.01
dust2B23121152%-0.00
anubisC1661038%-0.01
mirageA148657%-0.00
overpassB84450%-0.01
ancientC83538%0.01
nuke32167%0.04
stronghold1010%-0.10
office1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,921Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
2,390Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
56.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
9.3%Shot accuracy
5,639MVPs
2,263Hours (in match)
2,549Bombs planted
660Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,292dust2
4,654inferno
1,113nuke
730vertigo
386train
45office
17safehouse
11cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

331Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
72.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24760%1.0014.7
Ancient4560%1.0916.3
Mirage2843%0.9514.6
Inferno2658%0.9414.2
Anubis2450%0.9612.7
Nuke933%0.7712.7
Train2100%3.4026.0
Overpass1100%1.6715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.4%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
635msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.6417% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass4–13-0.068%13 Apr
dust213–40.0939%2 Apr
inferno13–160.0242%31 Mar
ancient13–10.1450%31 Mar
anubis9–130.0023%31 Mar
ancient17–190.0227%30 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0132%30 Mar
dust27–130.0121%30 Mar
dust213–60.0150%29 Mar
anubis13–20.0563%29 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0526%29 Mar
mirage13–60.0129%27 Mar
stronghold1–13-0.1023%24 Mar
office1–13-0.0960%24 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0440%24 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0220%20 Mar
dust28–13-0.0231%20 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0634%18 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0539%16 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0420%16 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0319%16 Mar
dust26–13-0.0337%15 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0030%15 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0523%15 Mar
overpass11–130.0439%12 Mar
mirage10–50.0331%12 Mar
dust210–130.0746%11 Mar
dust27–13-0.0139%11 Mar
overpass13–80.0221%10 Mar
anubis3–13-0.090%10 Mar
dust213–6-0.0224%9 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0319%9 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0214%8 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0226%6 Mar
dust213–3-0.0030%6 Mar
dust213–160.0129%6 Mar
dust213–9-0.0025%5 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0429%5 Mar
anubis13–90.0522%5 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0239%4 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0349%4 Mar
dust213–11-0.0128%3 Mar
inferno6–130.0620%3 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0717%2 Mar
inferno13–80.0128%2 Mar
anubis10–130.0125%1 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0529%1 Mar
dust213–11-0.0134%1 Mar
inferno1–13-0.1111%1 Mar
mirage13–110.0147%28 Feb
dust215–150.0120%25 Feb
overpass13–110.0127%24 Feb
anubis7–130.0224%24 Feb
inferno13–8-0.046%23 Feb
mirage13–100.0228%23 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0220%23 Feb
inferno9–130.0634%23 Feb
dust213–50.0419%19 Feb
inferno16–140.0229%19 Feb
anubis9–130.0140%18 Feb
dust216–14-0.0240%17 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0426%17 Feb
dust213–80.0226%17 Feb
ancient9–130.0125%15 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0036%15 Feb
dust213–11-0.0035%13 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0325%13 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0121%13 Feb
dust212–12-0.0324%12 Feb
dust25–20.0550%12 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0328%12 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0132%10 Feb
inferno9–40.0632%10 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0234%10 Feb
dust28–130.0230%10 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0038%8 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0231%7 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0125%6 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0323%4 Feb
dust22–13-0.0735%4 Feb
inferno13–90.0538%4 Feb
nuke13–90.0832%3 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0017%3 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0225%2 Feb
inferno13–70.0738%2 Feb
mirage13–90.0437%2 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0436%2 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0226%1 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0627%1 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0217%31 Jan
dust22–13-0.1514%31 Jan
mirage4–130.0322%31 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0044%30 Jan
nuke13–30.0528%30 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0421%28 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0228%28 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0527%27 Jan
overpass13–160.0639%27 Jan
mirage13–60.0341%26 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0324%26 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →