༒乂𝙎𝙬𝙖𝙜𝙞乂༒ — CS2 Stats

MY76561198274679027[U:1:314413299]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,771Tracked matches89%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.4 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating26,790Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7951 of 261611 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,790 +4,027 2 Oct – 13 Nov · 11 days played

27,073Peak Premier in tracked matches

28Days played since 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 26,790
+3,521 over 30 days · improving
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,210 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-11-01
Pink band first seen 2026-11-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92

Positioning69

Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY79–13–8Last 10079%Win rateLWWWWLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −77ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating 0.06
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 475ms

Last 10

7–2–1 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 21%
Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

17–2–1 · 85% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.2

Utility6.7

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2

Positioning6.9

Utility6.7

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels5.8

Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time554ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms

Headshot accuracy22.9%+0.7%

first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 17 Oct →

40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 12 Oct →

422msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · inferno, 27 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

16Longest win streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 91% over 23ancientWeakest map · 60% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	23	17–6	74%	0.03
mirage	S	23	21–2	91%	0.03
cache	S	18	13–5	72%	0.02
inferno	S	15	11–4	73%	0.02
anubis	S	11	9–2	82%	0.04
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	0.00
nuke	—	3	3–0	100%	0.04
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (60% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

321Matches

55%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

81.9ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	32	56%	1.07	15.2
Inferno	31	65%	1.15	17.1
Mirage	27	44%	1.14	15.5
Ancient	17	59%	1.06	16.2
Nuke	11	18%	0.84	16.1
Dust2	10	60%	1.35	15.7
Overpass	10	50%	1.30	16.5
Vertigo	1	0%	0.73	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy

43.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.6%Spray accuracy

86.7%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

544msReaction time

39.1%T opening success

66.9%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

6.1%Flash assists

11.56HE damage / grenade

10.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.1341% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	4–13	-0.03	33%	13 Nov →
anubis	13–3	0.14	15%	13 Nov →
mirage	13–9	0.02	27%	13 Nov →
mirage	13–4	0.08	18%	13 Nov →
mirage	13–5	0.08	15%	13 Nov →
dust2	11–13	0.01	23%	9 Nov →
cache	13–2	0.00	29%	9 Nov →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	21%	9 Nov →
mirage	12–12	-0.00	18%	9 Nov →
inferno	13–3	-0.02	15%	6 Nov →
cache	13–6	0.07	27%	6 Nov →
nuke	13–4	-0.02	38%	6 Nov →
mirage	13–8	0.06	13%	6 Nov →
inferno	13–8	0.02	26%	6 Nov →
mirage	13–0	0.05	31%	6 Nov →
inferno	13–10	0.03	18%	3 Nov →
cache	13–2	0.02	19%	3 Nov →
ancient	13–10	0.00	22%	3 Nov →
mirage	6–6	0.00	19%	3 Nov →
cache	13–4	0.03	21%	1 Nov →
dust2	12–12	0.02	26%	1 Nov →
anubis	13–11	0.09	26%	31 Oct →
nuke	13–7	0.04	33%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.02	19%	31 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	13%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.07	38%	31 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.10	24%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.03	14%	31 Oct →
inferno	12–12	0.11	28%	31 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.00	29%	30 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.03	15%	30 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.02	18%	30 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.11	27%	28 Oct →
inferno	13–2	0.04	23%	28 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	16%	28 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.01	17%	27 Oct →
inferno	12–2	0.02	0%	25 Oct →
cache	5–13	0.00	39%	25 Oct →
anubis	13–2	0.11	33%	25 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.03	14%	25 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.02	26%	25 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	16%	24 Oct →
nuke	13–0	0.11	0%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.02	17%	24 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	29%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–1	-0.04	33%	24 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.01	22%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.05	13%	24 Oct →
cache	13–6	-0.02	22%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.00	29%	23 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.04	28%	23 Oct →
cache	12–12	-0.00	19%	23 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.05	39%	22 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.09	16%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–1	0.04	17%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.08	25%	20 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.00	18%	20 Oct →
overpass	13–7	-0.02	15%	20 Oct →
cache	13–9	0.02	12%	20 Oct →
anubis	13–0	0.04	16%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–0	0.07	26%	19 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.03	11%	19 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.06	19%	19 Oct →
overpass	13–2	0.13	29%	19 Oct →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	20%	19 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.02	12%	19 Oct →
anubis	13–2	0.02	3%	19 Oct →
anubis	13–6	0.01	18%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.04	18%	17 Oct →
cache	13–3	0.16	24%	17 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.03	35%	17 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	19%	16 Oct →
mirage	8–1	-0.00	33%	14 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.07	32%	14 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.02	25%	14 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.01	20%	14 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.03	20%	14 Oct →
anubis	13–5	0.03	22%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.05	40%	12 Oct →
cache	11–13	0.07	18%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–7	0.02	17%	10 Oct →
dust2	12–12	0.04	28%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.13	18%	8 Oct →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	32%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.03	17%	7 Oct →
inferno	6–13	0.00	34%	7 Oct →
ancient	2–13	-0.01	38%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	14%	3 Oct →
cache	12–12	0.00	23%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–2	0.13	16%	3 Oct →
anubis	0–13	-0.02	0%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.07	33%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.03	17%	2 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.04	13%	2 Oct →
ancient	14–16	0.00	21%	2 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.05	8%	1 Oct →
inferno	13–5	0.01	23%	30 Sept →
inferno	12–12	0.06	18%	27 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	16%	24 Sept →
mirage	13–0	0.01	25%	24 Sept →