MOS51 T-N-T

MOS51 T-N-T — CS2 Stats

76561198273245126[U:1:312979398]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,530Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85065 of 259968 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,922 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 -5,127 22 Aug – 4 Nov · 38 days played
18,53126,019peak 26,01922 Aug4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,922 +0 30 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
1,9221,922peak 1,92230 Aug1 Sept
26,157Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,922Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,922
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 79 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,020 below peak (26,019)
  • -2,047 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMOS51 T-N-TFACEITLevel 9 · 1,922 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,922csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning46
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateWLWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · +135ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 728ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 672ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.2
Utility5.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time617ms+42ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 28 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 28 Aug →
313msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 28 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 26cacheWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2712–1544%-0.01
infernoA2615–1158%-0.01
mirageB136–746%-0.02
ancientD122–1017%-0.01
anubisB84–450%0.00
dust2D72–529%-0.06
cacheD71–614%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,543Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
76.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage35251%1.0214.9
Ancient22549%1.0014.8
Anubis20250%1.1014.9
Inferno20058%1.1014.9
Nuke15557%1.0615.5
Dust213742%0.9914.8
Vertigo4146%1.2615.4
Overpass2733%0.9014.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
601msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.80HE damage / grenade
9.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4668 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4268% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–7-0.0124%4 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0333%4 Nov →
ancient13–90.0924%31 Oct →
nuke13–30.0033%31 Oct →
inferno13–40.0428%31 Oct →
inferno13–40.0733%31 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0729%30 Oct →
nuke13–40.0829%30 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.017%30 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0228%30 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0920%28 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0425%28 Oct →
nuke13–00.1138%28 Oct →
anubis13–40.069%27 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0422%27 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0226%26 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0318%26 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0016%26 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0515%26 Oct →
inferno13–90.0524%21 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0421%21 Oct →
ancient13–160.0422%20 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0222%20 Oct →
cache0–6-0.0567%20 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0345%20 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0029%17 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0633%17 Oct →
nuke10–130.0719%16 Oct →
inferno13–60.0224%16 Oct →
cache4–13-0.1617%14 Oct →
inferno13–20.0011%14 Oct →
dust27–13-0.109%14 Oct →
nuke13–90.0430%14 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0517%14 Oct →
ancient6–130.0131%14 Oct →
mirage13–10.030%13 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0030%13 Oct →
mirage11–130.0324%13 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0416%5 Oct →
inferno13–30.0531%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0518%3 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0313%1 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0334%1 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.100%1 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0525%1 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0012%30 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0119%30 Sept →
cache6–130.0146%30 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0726%30 Sept →
nuke12–160.0124%28 Sept →
nuke14–160.0316%28 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0527%26 Sept →
inferno13–60.0233%26 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0417%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.0321%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0519%24 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0124%24 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0429%24 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0829%24 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0920%23 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.1010%23 Sept →
inferno13–60.0113%22 Sept →
nuke5–00.0436%22 Sept →
anubis11–40.0129%22 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0332%22 Sept →
anubis5–130.0235%22 Sept →
nuke13–100.0320%21 Sept →
inferno13–20.0611%21 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0032%21 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0124%20 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0720%15 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0821%14 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0124%14 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0724%13 Sept →
cache13–50.0118%12 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0129%9 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0139%9 Sept →
ancient4–130.0111%9 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0618%9 Sept →
cache13–160.0331%8 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0732%8 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0421%8 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0114%7 Sept →
ancient10–130.0111%5 Sept →
inferno13–50.0717%5 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0313%4 Sept →
anubis16–140.0224%1 Sept →
nuke13–50.0221%1 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0914%31 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0213%31 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0424%30 Aug →
mirage13–30.0465%29 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.10100%28 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0616%28 Aug →
inferno13–20.0129%28 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.027%26 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0017%25 Aug →
ancient5–130.0418%23 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0622%22 Aug →
nuke13–60.0622%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.