Dr GETEMSworth

Dr GETEMSworth — CS2 Stats

76561198273228872[U:1:312963144]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,746Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidOpening Duellist
CSDB Leaderboard#76695 of 226756 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 16 days played since 23 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,992 -2,050 23 May27 Jun · 5 days played
19,99222,042peak 22,04223 May27 Jun
22,735Peak Premier in tracked matches
16Days played since 2026-05-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDr GETEMSworthFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning44
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT41536Last 10041%Win rateWWLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −6.0pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening DuellistWinning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+0.8 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim8.8
Utility4.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch1.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time532ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy27.3%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 33.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 24 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · dust2, 26 Jul
344msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · mirage, 26 May
13–0Biggest win · cache, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 11infernoWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2171433%0.00
mirageB1991047%0.02
infernoD1641225%-0.01
ancientB126650%0.01
nukeB115645%0.01
cacheA116555%-0.00
overpassC52340%0.02
anubis31233%0.03
train1010%-0.06
vertigo110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,407Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
76.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3450%1.0414.3
Anubis2462%1.0215.8
Vertigo2365%1.1115.0
Nuke2250%1.0815.8
Dust2743%0.7812.6
Inferno650%0.9819.3
Mirage683%1.2416.5
Overpass540%0.9711.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
536msReaction time
38.8%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
12.00HE damage / grenade
4.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.7775% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–3-0.0030%8 Sept
anubis13–100.0714%8 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0521%7 Sept
mirage6–130.0118%7 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0124%7 Sept
dust216–120.0326%7 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0123%7 Sept
inferno13–10.0421%7 Sept
dust213–7-0.0423%7 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0422%7 Sept
cache13–110.0423%7 Sept
mirage13–90.0817%7 Sept
inferno2–6-0.1133%7 Sept
dust213–60.0938%6 Sept
nuke2–10-0.0346%6 Sept
ancient7–13-0.1029%6 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0122%6 Sept
cache13–11-0.0126%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0625%6 Sept
ancient13–60.1222%6 Sept
dust22–13-0.0326%6 Sept
cache6–13-0.0420%6 Sept
ancient13–70.0223%5 Sept
dust29–130.0334%5 Sept
mirage10–130.0335%5 Sept
inferno13–100.0427%5 Sept
mirage13–80.0941%5 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0816%5 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0142%2 Aug
inferno2–70.0127%2 Aug
dust23–130.0731%2 Aug
dust22–130.0432%2 Aug
mirage3–130.0242%2 Aug
dust213–100.0640%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0517%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0532%2 Aug
cache13–00.0240%2 Aug
ancient13–70.0218%2 Aug
train7–13-0.0642%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0239%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0425%2 Aug
anubis4–130.0632%2 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0616%2 Aug
cache13–4-0.0617%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0727%26 Jul
dust25–130.0630%26 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0442%26 Jul
dust212–120.0550%26 Jul
ancient6–130.0329%12 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0330%12 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0835%12 Jul
cache13–30.0833%12 Jul
dust213–50.0540%12 Jul
dust26–13-0.0827%12 Jul
vertigo13–6-0.0234%28 Jun
nuke13–40.1143%28 Jun
mirage12–120.0539%28 Jun
cache7–13-0.0525%28 Jun
dust212–12-0.0136%28 Jun
ancient16–140.0619%27 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0643%27 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0237%27 Jun
mirage13–60.0734%13 Jun
inferno12–120.0423%13 Jun
dust21–13-0.0419%13 Jun
cache5–130.0221%13 Jun
nuke7–130.0319%31 May
overpass10–130.0937%31 May
inferno3–13-0.0833%31 May
ancient13–100.1032%31 May
dust25–130.0741%31 May
nuke12–12-0.0710%30 May
overpass2–13-0.0332%30 May
inferno9–13-0.0418%26 May
overpass4–20.0629%26 May
mirage2–13-0.076%26 May
inferno9–130.0149%25 May
dust213–70.0334%25 May
nuke10–130.0632%25 May
cache2–13-0.0542%25 May
inferno12–120.0127%25 May
dust213–6-0.0235%25 May
inferno13–40.1036%25 May
mirage11–13-0.0638%24 May
ancient4–13-0.0436%24 May
mirage13–100.1349%24 May
nuke11–130.0746%24 May
cache13–110.0939%24 May
mirage13–70.0519%24 May
inferno11–130.0432%24 May
dust28–13-0.0645%24 May
ancient0–130.0035%24 May
mirage13–100.0233%23 May
overpass13–90.0228%23 May
mirage3–130.0224%23 May
overpass2–13-0.0217%23 May
dust28–13-0.0829%23 May
ancient3–130.0148%23 May
nuke13–8-0.0135%23 May
nuke14–16-0.0044%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →