Sp00nS

Sp00nS — CS2 Stats

76561198268506452[U:1:308240724]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

305Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
820Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidClutch Specialist
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 14 Oct 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,705 +1,407 14 Oct25 Jan · 18 days played
13,17615,198peak 15,19814 Oct25 Jan
15,492Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2024-10-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning64
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52417Last 10052%Win rateLWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +5.2pp headshot accuracy · −141ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch10.0

Excellent counter-strafingReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 670ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time677ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 677ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 25 Oct
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 13 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 3 May
11–0Biggest win · overpass, 1 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35171849%0.04
mirageA27151256%0.02
infernoC104640%0.01
vertigoA85363%0.03
ancientA74357%0.01
nuke42250%-0.03
overpass42250%0.03
anubis330100%0.01
cache1010%-0.03
train1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

53,335Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
2,053Matches
34.7%Match win rate
39.4%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
4,653MVPs
820Hours (in match)
2,383Bombs planted
438Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,474dust2
696inferno
488nuke
362vertigo
202lake
139bank
80safehouse
53cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches
40%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
58.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
92.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
670msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
14.91HE damage / grenade
9.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8324% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust20–11-0.0936%13 Sept
mirage13–90.0044%13 Sept
nuke16–130.0226%13 Sept
ancient1–3-0.0040%5 Sept
dust21–13-0.0224%5 Sept
mirage13–100.0222%30 Aug
cache1–13-0.0318%30 Aug
inferno13–40.0426%30 Aug
dust213–7-0.0127%30 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0225%25 Aug
inferno10–130.0229%19 Mar
dust24–110.0039%18 Mar
dust213–30.0716%17 Mar
mirage11–10.035%17 Mar
ancient13–70.0335%15 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0623%15 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0130%15 Mar
ancient13–6-0.0515%19 Oct
dust29–10.0624%6 Sept
dust213–60.0320%30 Aug
dust27–13-0.0210%29 Aug
dust213–80.0718%18 Aug
dust213–40.0611%12 Aug
mirage0–7-0.0640%11 Aug
mirage13–70.1516%9 Aug
dust29–130.0123%7 Aug
dust212–120.0023%3 Aug
dust23–90.0239%3 Aug
dust212–120.0717%2 Aug
train7–130.0313%2 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0418%1 Aug
overpass11–00.1116%1 Aug
dust213–40.0112%27 Jul
dust20–2-0.070%27 Jul
vertigo13–2-0.049%25 Jul
inferno6–13-0.1111%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0516%25 Jul
mirage13–80.0120%23 Jul
dust213–80.0416%23 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0228%23 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0614%20 Jul
overpass13–20.0918%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0123%19 Jul
dust213–100.0622%19 Jul
dust211–130.0523%13 Jul
dust21–5-0.0530%13 Jul
dust213–100.0014%6 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0721%7 Jun
overpass7–130.0016%11 May
mirage12–12-0.0026%11 May
dust213–20.1027%11 May
vertigo12–12-0.0219%11 May
dust213–30.0231%3 May
dust29–130.0130%3 May
inferno3–9-0.060%3 May
mirage12–120.0526%3 May
dust211–130.0823%27 Apr
mirage11–130.0224%27 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0613%25 Jan
anubis16–140.0725%19 Jan
dust215–150.0224%12 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0342%12 Jan
mirage7–00.0824%5 Jan
dust211–130.0235%29 Dec
mirage13–30.0632%29 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0018%13 Dec
vertigo9–13-0.0218%5 Dec
mirage13–90.0213%10 Nov
mirage9–130.0527%10 Nov
ancient11–130.0115%9 Nov
ancient13–80.0223%9 Nov
vertigo13–80.0122%5 Nov
mirage13–16-0.0215%2 Nov
dust213–80.0622%2 Nov
mirage13–80.0530%2 Nov
anubis16–140.0113%2 Nov
ancient13–80.0429%2 Nov
dust211–130.0830%2 Nov
vertigo15–15-0.0322%28 Oct
inferno13–110.0415%28 Oct
vertigo16–120.0318%27 Oct
dust210–130.0128%27 Oct
inferno13–20.1433%27 Oct
dust213–80.1318%27 Oct
vertigo13–50.1415%26 Oct
vertigo13–60.1827%26 Oct
dust213–30.2127%25 Oct
dust213–50.1520%20 Oct
inferno3–13-0.079%20 Oct
mirage13–80.0419%20 Oct
dust213–70.0823%20 Oct
mirage9–13-0.0717%20 Oct
nuke1–9-0.1017%19 Oct
dust210–13-0.0027%19 Oct
mirage16–13-0.0115%19 Oct
mirage13–70.0013%17 Oct
inferno13–160.0320%17 Oct
inferno13–160.0316%15 Oct
mirage13–100.0429%14 Oct
mirage12–130.0422%14 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →