Eggcorn

Eggcorn — CS2 Stats

76561198268159877[U:1:307894149]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

175Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
847Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 175 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 1 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,575 +2,876 1 Dec21 Feb · 17 days played
14,69918,186peak 18,1861 Dec21 Feb
18,186Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2025-12-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,018), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate30.5%41.9%42.7%12.2% short
Shot accuracy19.8%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.290.981.00above
Match win rate51.2%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEggcornFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning62
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateLWLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −71ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 654ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility5.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning6.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact3.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time643ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 1 May
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 20 Dec
422msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 23 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 11 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.01
cacheB20101050%0.05
dust2B1910953%0.01
infernoD1861233%-0.01
nukeS64267%-0.01
overpassC52340%-0.01
ancient32167%-0.03
sanctum1010%-0.08
anubis1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,947Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
2,010Matches
51.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 3 players
30.5%Headshot %
19.8%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 3 players
5,263MVPs
847Hours (in match)
2,333Bombs planted
611Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,168dust2
4,397inferno
384nuke
172vertigo
169cbble
162office
158train
44dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
642msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
9.54HE damage / grenade
9.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.747% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1213% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0616%23 Aug
cache13–90.0510%12 May
cache3–130.0214%12 May
cache13–110.0715%12 May
cache13–40.1419%6 May
cache13–40.0712%6 May
cache10–10.0711%6 May
cache11–130.074%2 May
cache13–30.039%2 May
cache6–13-0.0413%2 May
cache12–120.059%2 May
cache13–90.0813%2 May
cache13–40.129%1 May
cache13–50.064%1 May
cache7–130.0610%1 May
cache6–130.049%1 May
cache6–13-0.0716%1 May
cache12–120.1213%1 May
cache13–40.1614%1 May
dust210–13-0.0013%1 May
cache7–130.039%29 Apr
cache4–13-0.0629%29 Apr
inferno7–130.039%27 Apr
dust213–30.0323%18 Apr
mirage8–130.032%17 Apr
inferno7–13-0.027%17 Apr
inferno12–120.0118%29 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0213%1 Mar
dust26–130.0230%1 Mar
mirage13–60.0514%1 Mar
mirage15–150.0316%21 Feb
inferno5–130.008%10 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0124%6 Feb
dust213–50.0125%6 Feb
inferno10–130.018%1 Feb
mirage13–90.0513%1 Feb
dust29–130.0810%1 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0015%31 Jan
dust213–30.0816%31 Jan
mirage9–130.0519%31 Jan
dust213–110.0219%29 Jan
inferno14–16-0.0412%28 Jan
mirage10–13-0.019%28 Jan
dust28–130.1111%27 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0410%27 Jan
dust24–13-0.0910%26 Jan
mirage13–10-0.033%26 Jan
sanctum7–9-0.089%26 Jan
mirage10–13-0.074%26 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0410%26 Jan
overpass3–9-0.035%26 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0312%26 Jan
dust24–130.0215%26 Jan
dust213–6-0.0116%25 Jan
mirage9–130.034%21 Jan
inferno11–130.029%20 Jan
dust213–4-0.033%20 Jan
anubis10–130.0114%20 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0317%20 Jan
inferno13–80.017%19 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0011%19 Jan
inferno16–140.0011%14 Jan
dust213–50.1014%14 Jan
nuke13–30.006%14 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0210%13 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0211%13 Jan
inferno13–7-0.016%13 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0610%11 Jan
mirage13–10.0616%11 Jan
dust213–70.0522%11 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0110%11 Jan
overpass13–11-0.015%10 Jan
mirage16–140.0315%10 Jan
nuke8–13-0.067%10 Jan
dust216–13-0.0012%10 Jan
dust213–70.0126%7 Jan
mirage13–50.0613%7 Jan
mirage11–130.017%5 Jan
inferno10–130.0014%5 Jan
mirage13–90.0124%5 Jan
dust28–13-0.048%30 Dec
nuke13–110.0121%30 Dec
mirage9–130.016%30 Dec
nuke11–13-0.015%27 Dec
overpass14–160.047%27 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0312%27 Dec
dust27–13-0.058%20 Dec
mirage13–6-0.019%20 Dec
inferno9–130.0330%20 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0313%20 Dec
inferno13–6-0.0343%20 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0314%20 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0211%14 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0314%14 Dec
inferno13–80.0110%14 Dec
nuke13–9-0.0515%12 Dec
inferno9–13-0.035%6 Dec
mirage13–8-0.022%6 Dec
mirage13–50.0914%1 Dec
nuke13–40.0518%1 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →