Fracki Skill

Fracki Skill — CS2 Stats

DE76561198266885096[U:1:306619368]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

263Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
486Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#55990 of 231244 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 30 May 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,594 +9,771 12 Nov7 May · 6 days played
11,82322,489peak 22,48912 Nov7 May
22,489Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2023-05-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.3%42.7%43.8%meets
Shot accuracy22.0%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.290.991.02above
Match win rate51.7%43.9%44.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFracki SkillFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning52
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY503713Last 10050%Win rateTWLLLWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −119ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 893 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.4
Utility5.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time615ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.36Best match rating · 9–1 · overpass, 3 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 15 Mar
375msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · vertigo, 8 Sept
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 2 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
30Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB20101050%0.03
mirageC1771041%-0.00
cacheA138562%0.01
dust2C125742%-0.02
anubisA85363%-0.01
overpassB84450%0.04
ancientS64267%0.04
vertigoS64267%-0.02
nukeD51420%-0.06
poseidon21150%0.03
train21150%0.04
sanctum1010%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,668Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
1,199Matches
51.7%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 4 players
43.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
22.0%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 4 players
4,144MVPs
486Hours (in match)
1,197Bombs planted
329Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,939inferno
1,905dust2
403vertigo
358train
292cbble
133nuke
57lake
16office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
613msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
10.47HE damage / grenade
9.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7962% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–80.1026%19 Jul
anubis13–40.078%18 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0814%18 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0629%18 Jul
cache0–13-0.020%18 Jul
anubis12–40.0112%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0215%18 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0616%18 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0833%18 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0020%16 Jul
cache13–8-0.0422%16 Jul
overpass9–130.0413%7 May
ancient13–100.1023%7 May
dust210–13-0.0523%7 May
inferno8–8-0.0020%7 May
inferno8–130.0329%4 Apr
poseidon2–9-0.0133%4 Apr
mirage13–30.0822%4 Apr
nuke0–9-0.258%4 Apr
inferno13–60.0812%3 Apr
inferno8–80.015%3 Apr
mirage12–120.0822%3 Apr
dust213–4-0.0324%3 Apr
sanctum5–90.0822%3 Apr
nuke8–80.0617%3 Apr
inferno9–50.1019%3 Apr
vertigo9–7-0.0329%3 Apr
overpass9–10.3613%3 Apr
dust210–13-0.0924%2 Apr
anubis13–2-0.0219%2 Apr
mirage12–120.0418%1 Apr
anubis13–70.0721%1 Apr
nuke9–40.0619%1 Apr
poseidon9–40.0619%1 Apr
inferno13–80.0014%1 Apr
inferno5–90.0416%1 Apr
vertigo4–9-0.0921%1 Apr
inferno2–9-0.1321%1 Apr
nuke4–9-0.0822%1 Apr
anubis13–110.0715%30 Mar
ancient13–70.0320%30 Mar
ancient11–130.0317%15 Mar
dust213–10-0.0850%15 Mar
dust210–13-0.0325%14 Mar
overpass13–40.057%28 Feb
ancient13–90.0717%28 Feb
dust215–150.0317%27 Feb
dust213–7-0.1316%18 Oct
mirage6–13-0.110%19 Sept
anubis11–13-0.1012%19 Sept
dust26–13-0.0813%19 Sept
mirage11–130.0020%17 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0333%9 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0440%9 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0414%8 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0029%10 Mar
train6–130.0522%15 Nov
train13–20.0233%15 Nov
dust213–40.0641%15 Oct
dust212–120.1916%10 Sept
vertigo13–40.0333%8 Sept
inferno10–130.0413%22 Aug
anubis0–4-0.140%7 Mar
inferno13–70.0622%7 Mar
mirage0–13-0.090%7 Mar
vertigo10–13-0.0020%12 Nov
dust210–16-0.0710%20 Jul
vertigo16–140.0020%20 Jul
inferno16–130.0016%16 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0112%16 Jul
overpass10–16-0.0414%15 Jul
inferno16–130.0410%15 Jul
inferno14–160.036%14 Jul
overpass5–16-0.0810%14 Jul
mirage7–16-0.046%14 Jul
mirage13–160.0413%12 Jul
vertigo16–13-0.0412%12 Jul
cache15–15-0.0117%16 Jun
cache16–120.0313%16 Jun
cache11–16-0.0223%16 Jun
cache16–50.0625%8 Jun
cache15–150.0615%8 Jun
inferno16–120.1322%8 Jun
dust216–50.024%6 Jun
cache16–100.1013%6 Jun
inferno16–80.0516%6 Jun
cache9–50.0513%6 Jun
cache16–7-0.0319%6 Jun
mirage4–9-0.066%5 Jun
inferno9–00.1814%5 Jun
mirage9–10.0316%5 Jun
mirage16–10-0.0046%5 Jun
cache8–8-0.0814%3 Jun
overpass12–160.0527%1 Jun
cache16–12-0.0019%1 Jun
mirage16–90.0416%30 May
overpass16–10-0.0145%30 May
overpass9–2-0.0227%30 May
mirage15–150.0217%30 May
cache16–120.0517%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →