Portagee

Portagee — CS2 Stats

NO76561198258019103[U:1:297753375]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

259Tracked matches54%Win rate2023Tracked since
329Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 19 Feb 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,694 -646 23 Feb16 May · 7 days played
15,32116,340peak 16,34023 Feb16 May
16,340Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2024-02-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,156), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate35.6%40.9%41.3%5.7% short
Shot accuracy13.4%14.2%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.990.950.95above
Match win rate35.6%42.1%42.5%7.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPortageeFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning42
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50428Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility3.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.2
Utility3.0
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time600ms+45ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 11.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 9 May
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · vertigo, 28 Aug
383msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 22 Apr
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 6 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8officeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC1771041%-0.00
anubisC1771041%0.00
vertigoB158753%-0.01
dust2C146843%0.02
infernoS86275%0.02
ancientA85363%0.02
nukeS64267%0.04
officeD62433%0.00
overpass32167%0.06
train32167%-0.03
cache110100%-0.05
agency1010%-0.03
thera1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

16,463Lifetime kills
0.99K/D · Top 50% of Level 1 players
944Matches
35.6%Match win rate
35.6%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy
2,159MVPs
329Hours (in match)
708Bombs planted
326Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,075vertigo
712inferno
471nuke
400dust2
257train
231office
42cbble
10lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
67.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
582msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
39.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
5.44HE damage / grenade
6.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1996% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0385% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0417%10 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0111%9 Aug
cache4–4-0.050%9 Aug
ancient9–130.0715%7 Aug
overpass16–140.0316%15 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0417%15 Nov
inferno13–40.0711%15 Nov
vertigo7–90.0622%15 Nov
overpass13–100.118%1 Nov
ancient9–13-0.0313%1 Nov
inferno13–9-0.0112%1 Nov
agency11–13-0.0314%4 Oct
train8–20.0112%10 Sept
train4–2-0.030%10 Sept
ancient13–80.037%23 Aug
nuke8–130.0628%30 Jul
anubis12–12-0.029%23 Jul
vertigo13–100.0016%14 Jul
ancient13–20.0624%14 Jul
anubis2–13-0.064%6 May
mirage8–13-0.0220%5 May
dust26–13-0.058%25 Apr
dust21–13-0.048%23 Nov
office13–10-0.0717%22 Nov
mirage13–30.0623%22 Nov
train12–12-0.0610%22 Nov
anubis4–130.0320%25 Oct
thera5–13-0.0114%20 Oct
dust24–13-0.0419%20 Oct
anubis4–30.066%20 Oct
vertigo13–30.0435%28 Aug
office1–130.0020%25 Jun
mirage2–13-0.077%25 Jun
mirage12–120.042%21 May
dust213–4-0.0213%21 May
anubis13–60.0110%21 May
vertigo8–13-0.058%20 May
mirage13–60.0111%20 May
dust213–70.059%20 May
ancient13–5-0.0215%20 May
anubis13–10.0414%20 May
dust213–10.1420%19 May
mirage11–13-0.0419%19 May
anubis6–10.016%16 May
anubis13–100.0111%16 May
dust212–12-0.0326%16 May
office13–50.0833%12 May
inferno7–13-0.0110%12 May
dust29–130.0816%9 May
nuke13–80.038%9 May
vertigo13–6-0.0314%9 May
inferno13–10.1825%9 May
mirage13–80.0911%9 May
mirage8–13-0.106%6 May
inferno0–13-0.1011%6 May
dust213–10.1231%6 May
mirage13–60.073%6 May
vertigo12–16-0.0310%6 May
vertigo13–00.008%6 May
dust211–13-0.048%5 May
anubis7–13-0.0513%5 May
nuke13–40.0217%5 May
anubis9–130.0213%5 May
ancient13–11-0.027%30 Apr
inferno13–20.039%30 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0715%30 Apr
mirage13–110.1010%30 Apr
office6–130.0117%30 Apr
vertigo5–13-0.0619%28 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.029%28 Apr
dust213–110.0014%28 Apr
dust22–13-0.076%28 Apr
anubis4–13-0.099%28 Apr
dust213–10.0914%28 Apr
ancient13–70.0913%22 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.023%22 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0414%22 Apr
mirage13–40.0612%16 Apr
anubis13–30.108%16 Apr
vertigo12–60.0217%16 Apr
vertigo13–8-0.018%16 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0512%8 Apr
vertigo13–7-0.0314%8 Apr
office12–12-0.0214%3 Apr
ancient7–130.0113%1 Apr
overpass12–120.030%21 Mar
mirage13–110.014%21 Mar
nuke7–00.140%21 Mar
anubis3–130.0211%21 Mar
nuke13–80.053%6 Mar
mirage2–13-0.1318%6 Mar
anubis6–13-0.1127%6 Mar
vertigo5–13-0.0222%6 Mar
office12–120.017%6 Mar
anubis5–13-0.034%25 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0111%23 Feb
mirage12–12-0.028%20 Feb
vertigo13–11-0.0121%20 Feb
anubis13–90.066%19 Feb
anubis11–130.019%19 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →