ppp

ppp — CS2 Stats

CN76561198255333566[U:1:295067838]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

601Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (44 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+14Tracked matches · now 601
−6.9ppWin rate · 55.2% → 48.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,549 -553 5 Apr – 25 Jun · 9 days played
25,51626,561peak 26,5615 Apr25 Jun
26,561Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-04-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpppFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning62
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–37–2Last 10061%Win rateLLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.6
Utility4.8
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch6.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.2
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time561ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 4–8 · dust2, 20 Apr →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · mirage, 2 May →
266msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · mirage, 2 May →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L4Current streak
13–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 50% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA4427–1761%0.03
dust2S1410–471%0.07
ancientA148–657%0.02
anubisB126–650%0.03
cacheS97–278%0.03
nuke—32–167%-0.02
inferno—20–20%0.04
overpass—21–150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

428Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
92.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13163%1.2818.6
Dust25556%1.2718.6
Ancient5357%1.3118.7
Anubis4358%1.3118.6
Cache1164%1.2516.8
Nuke1040%1.3919.3
Inferno729%1.2517.7
Train633%1.1817.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
557msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
9.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7714% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.1216%12 Sept →
mirage4–9-0.0527%12 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0216%7 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0319%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0618%1 Sept →
mirage14–160.0717%22 Aug →
nuke11–130.0727%21 Aug →
cache13–100.0916%21 Aug →
mirage13–80.0422%1 Aug →
mirage13–60.0126%25 Jun →
inferno7–130.0024%19 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0819%19 Jun →
mirage16–19-0.0213%18 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0420%16 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0623%5 Jun →
ancient11–130.0225%3 Jun →
mirage13–10.1111%3 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0016%1 Jun →
cache13–7-0.0028%30 May →
mirage12–120.0222%26 May →
mirage11–130.0011%26 May →
mirage13–20.0216%25 May →
inferno2–130.087%23 May →
dust28–130.0911%23 May →
mirage7–130.0125%21 May →
cache13–60.0424%20 May →
mirage13–11-0.0116%20 May →
cache13–80.1130%20 May →
mirage13–110.0213%20 May →
dust213–90.0623%20 May →
mirage4–13-0.0517%20 May →
mirage13–4-0.0015%20 May →
mirage16–140.0229%20 May →
mirage11–13-0.0313%19 May →
mirage13–90.0217%19 May →
mirage13–10-0.0318%18 May →
mirage13–20.0930%18 May →
mirage13–80.0932%18 May →
mirage13–110.1015%18 May →
anubis13–40.0329%17 May →
ancient13–110.0113%15 May →
overpass19–170.0527%15 May →
ancient9–130.0529%12 May →
dust212–120.0720%9 May →
dust213–90.0419%5 May →
mirage10–13-0.0130%5 May →
ancient6–130.0111%4 May →
mirage13–100.0120%4 May →
mirage2–00.08100%2 May →
mirage13–20.1567%2 May →
cache13–80.0921%29 Apr →
cache13–110.0327%29 Apr →
cache3–13-0.0431%29 Apr →
dust213–30.0637%28 Apr →
mirage13–50.0828%28 Apr →
mirage18–220.0324%28 Apr →
ancient13–70.0920%28 Apr →
anubis13–110.0516%28 Apr →
mirage13–60.1321%28 Apr →
anubis13–70.0716%28 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0021%27 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0518%27 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.029%27 Apr →
dust213–20.0131%27 Apr →
dust213–40.0838%27 Apr →
dust213–110.0820%27 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.058%25 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.029%25 Apr →
ancient13–40.0214%25 Apr →
anubis13–40.0625%25 Apr →
mirage13–30.0927%25 Apr →
cache13–6-0.0027%25 Apr →
dust213–7-0.0116%24 Apr →
mirage5–130.0922%20 Apr →
dust24–80.2014%20 Apr →
anubis11–130.0124%20 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0421%20 Apr →
mirage10–130.0224%20 Apr →
ancient13–100.0211%20 Apr →
anubis8–130.0621%20 Apr →
mirage16–19-0.0426%20 Apr →
mirage16–140.0213%20 Apr →
mirage13–70.0516%18 Apr →
mirage16–140.0321%18 Apr →
ancient13–50.0712%18 Apr →
ancient13–100.0319%18 Apr →
ancient11–130.0121%18 Apr →
mirage13–90.0616%18 Apr →
mirage13–60.0414%17 Apr →
ancient13–20.0117%17 Apr →
ancient13–30.0321%17 Apr →
anubis16–190.0718%17 Apr →
dust216–120.0628%16 Apr →
dust213–70.0523%11 Apr →
mirage7–130.0124%11 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.008%10 Apr →
mirage13–16-0.0317%6 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0519%6 Apr →
mirage13–40.0716%5 Apr →
dust213–60.0113%5 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.