Lekkis

Lekkis — CS2 Stats

NO76561198253572968[U:1:293307240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,727Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,039Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#38326 of 225942 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,921 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,039 +2,425 27 Jul11 Sept · 25 days played
20,00023,394peak 23,39427 Jul11 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,921 +0 29 Aug30 Aug · 2 observations
1,9211,921peak 1,92129 Aug30 Aug
23,394Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,921Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,921
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 355 below peak (23,394)
  • +2,061 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,961 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLekkisFACEITLevel 8 · 1,921 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,039 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,921csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning67
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52453Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.5
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.7
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time535ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 4 Sept
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 8 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · ancient, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 27 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1910953%0.00
cacheB189950%0.01
dust2B157847%0.00
anubisC135838%0.01
ancientS129375%-0.00
nukeA127558%-0.01
infernoB105550%-0.01
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,973Matches
49%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
87.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18748%1.1317.3
Anubis15954%1.2017.9
Inferno14648%1.2419.3
Dust212544%1.2319.1
Ancient12458%1.3119.1
Nuke10649%1.3019.0
Train3053%1.3319.8
Overpass2952%1.2317.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
538msReaction time
58.1%T opening success
54.9%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.46HE damage / grenade
5.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4797 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0831%15 Sept
dust24–13-0.0318%11 Sept
cache12–16-0.0124%11 Sept
mirage13–70.0222%8 Sept
cache13–10-0.0233%8 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0322%8 Sept
ancient16–14-0.039%8 Sept
dust213–11-0.0412%8 Sept
ancient13–80.0324%8 Sept
mirage13–20.0020%8 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0522%8 Sept
inferno13–90.0428%7 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0210%7 Sept
dust213–90.0224%5 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0521%4 Sept
ancient13–60.0127%4 Sept
mirage13–40.1024%4 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0125%4 Sept
ancient13–80.0417%4 Sept
mirage13–20.0217%3 Sept
cache7–130.0110%3 Sept
mirage13–20.0623%3 Sept
dust28–13-0.0626%3 Sept
dust213–110.0111%1 Sept
cache5–130.0125%1 Sept
cache13–160.0213%29 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0120%29 Aug
mirage15–150.0115%29 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0610%28 Aug
mirage13–60.0120%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0221%28 Aug
dust213–110.019%27 Aug
mirage13–10.0924%27 Aug
cache7–130.0520%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0514%27 Aug
inferno6–130.0621%24 Aug
anubis6–130.0222%24 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0220%24 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0316%23 Aug
ancient13–40.0221%23 Aug
anubis13–20.0122%23 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0816%23 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0425%23 Aug
nuke13–110.0312%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0415%22 Aug
nuke16–140.0414%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0717%20 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0122%20 Aug
dust213–90.0118%19 Aug
anubis13–50.0715%19 Aug
cache13–10-0.0115%17 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0118%17 Aug
nuke13–90.0314%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.0515%16 Aug
mirage3–13-0.075%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0019%16 Aug
cache13–80.0215%15 Aug
nuke9–13-0.1030%14 Aug
mirage10–130.0124%12 Aug
cache9–13-0.0919%11 Aug
anubis12–16-0.035%9 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0016%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0617%7 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0113%7 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0514%7 Aug
nuke13–70.0316%7 Aug
cache13–10-0.0318%7 Aug
vertigo11–130.029%6 Aug
cache16–140.0120%6 Aug
nuke16–140.0115%5 Aug
dust210–130.0612%5 Aug
anubis13–60.0310%3 Aug
inferno13–40.0221%3 Aug
dust216–140.0328%2 Aug
cache13–90.0918%2 Aug
cache13–110.0214%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.089%2 Aug
anubis13–20.0219%2 Aug
mirage13–90.0717%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0217%1 Aug
cache10–130.0816%31 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0127%31 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0217%30 Jul
anubis14–16-0.057%30 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0819%29 Jul
anubis11–130.0524%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0410%29 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0023%29 Jul
dust213–50.0813%29 Jul
dust29–130.0831%29 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0315%28 Jul
inferno13–60.0326%28 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0013%28 Jul
anubis8–130.0519%28 Jul
dust27–13-0.0122%27 Jul
ancient13–100.026%27 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0818%27 Jul
cache13–80.0529%27 Jul
dust27–13-0.0325%27 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0318%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →