Na1kou

Na1kou — CS2 Stats

FI76561198245727328[U:1:285461600]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,873Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating10,048Blue band · top ~54.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 587 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 8 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,048 -2,558 11 Aug16 Sept · 21 days played
10,04813,564peak 13,56411 Aug16 Sept
13,927Peak Premier in tracked matches
587Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 587
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 164 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,516 below peak (13,564)
  • -2,962 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,952 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNa1kouFACEITLevel 3 · 587 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER10,048 · Blue bandPEAK ELO587csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning50
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5446Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 687ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 672ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility6.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 678ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning5.0
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time670ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms
Headshot accuracy12.5%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 12.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 14 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 8 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · nuke, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W3Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24131154%-0.03
nukeS2115671%-0.01
infernoB21101148%-0.04
ancientB137654%-0.01
cacheD93633%-0.06
mirageD51420%0.01
anubisS54180%-0.01
vertigo21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

308Matches
50%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
65.9ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26749%0.7312.2
Inferno6154%0.8812.3
Nuke5459%0.9314.2
Mirage4551%0.8712.0
Ancient4032%0.7311.6
Anubis1547%1.0014.9
Cache944%0.7110.4
Overpass862%0.7311.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
12.7°Preaim
678msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
10.30HE damage / grenade
7.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.7352° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.1886% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.075%17 Sept
dust213–7-0.0712%16 Sept
mirage13–30.0412%16 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0416%15 Sept
nuke13–90.0315%15 Sept
ancient10–13-0.057%15 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0410%14 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0111%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0515%14 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0524%14 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0312%14 Sept
cache8–13-0.067%14 Sept
cache9–13-0.0711%13 Sept
cache10–13-0.0110%13 Sept
ancient13–7-0.099%13 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0214%13 Sept
anubis13–80.0315%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.0117%11 Sept
inferno7–130.0116%11 Sept
dust28–130.0512%11 Sept
nuke13–3-0.024%11 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0413%10 Sept
dust28–13-0.0711%10 Sept
inferno8–13-0.077%10 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0412%9 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0613%9 Sept
dust213–5-0.0115%6 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0714%6 Sept
nuke13–60.0710%6 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0213%5 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0721%5 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0115%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0313%5 Sept
inferno5–2-0.1520%5 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0114%4 Sept
dust27–13-0.057%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0011%4 Sept
cache13–7-0.017%4 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0313%4 Sept
inferno13–7-0.077%4 Sept
ancient11–130.0117%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.1010%3 Sept
inferno13–3-0.0512%3 Sept
inferno13–10.0517%3 Sept
ancient13–7-0.039%28 Aug
nuke13–70.0312%28 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0318%27 Aug
nuke13–20.1117%27 Aug
dust213–80.0215%26 Aug
ancient16–14-0.007%26 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0418%26 Aug
cache13–9-0.0215%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0013%25 Aug
vertigo13–50.0014%25 Aug
cache3–13-0.1027%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0119%25 Aug
dust212–16-0.0517%25 Aug
inferno5–13-0.057%24 Aug
dust216–13-0.0210%24 Aug
anubis13–50.0310%24 Aug
dust28–130.0015%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.037%23 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0113%23 Aug
dust213–60.0515%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.108%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0714%19 Aug
cache13–8-0.0322%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0712%19 Aug
dust213–110.0022%19 Aug
nuke5–13-0.117%17 Aug
dust216–130.0014%17 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0014%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.1120%16 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0325%16 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0212%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0810%16 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0716%16 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0214%15 Aug
mirage9–130.0219%15 Aug
dust213–100.018%14 Aug
ancient13–40.1926%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0719%14 Aug
dust213–7-0.0312%13 Aug
inferno13–8-0.050%13 Aug
anubis13–4-0.005%13 Aug
nuke13–50.0413%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0111%12 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0321%12 Aug
ancient13–40.045%12 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0613%12 Aug
cache8–13-0.095%11 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0115%11 Aug
inferno13–10.0520%11 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0113%11 Aug
dust213–6-0.0111%11 Aug
inferno1–7-0.0124%11 Aug
nuke13–30.0516%9 Aug
inferno13–9-0.049%9 Aug
dust21–13-0.1033%8 Aug
dust213–3-0.0415%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →