Posk

Posk — CS2 Stats

US76561198243368036[U:1:283102308]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,418Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,894Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,624Purple band · top ~18% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,006 → 1,006
+4Tracked matches · now 1,418
+7.2ppWin rate · 57.1% → 64.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 70 days played since 19 Dec 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,624 +3,214 19 Dec18 Sept · 4 days played
12,55917,624peak 17,62419 Dec18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,006 +0 30 Aug8 Sept · 2 observations
1,0061,006peak 1,00630 Aug8 Sept
17,624Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,006Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2024-12-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,006
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 45 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,624
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,376 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=35,214), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate45.3%44.3%47.0%1.7% short
Shot accuracy15.2%11.8%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.991.031.080.09 short
Match win rate45.8%45.2%46.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPoskPREMIER17,624 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,006csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49474Last 10049%Win rateWWWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 700ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 702ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 678ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time689ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 5–1 · mirage, 18 Jul
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · train, 30 May
484msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 26 Jul
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1911858%0.02
ancientB179853%-0.01
dust2D134931%-0.01
infernoD134931%-0.00
anubisB137654%-0.01
cacheS65183%0.02
overpassS64267%0.00
trainC52340%-0.03
nuke41325%0.04
vertigo2020%-0.01
jura110100%0.10
grail110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,958Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,286Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band
45.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
10,618MVPs
1,572Hours (in match)
2,606Bombs planted
1,382Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,564inferno
2,779vertigo
2,522dust2
2,431nuke
853train
473office
389cbble
129lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

373Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
77.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4050%1.1515.4
Mirage3751%0.9415.0
Ancient2948%0.9816.2
Inferno2040%0.9216.0
Vertigo1856%1.2213.9
Nuke1540%1.3218.3
Dust2862%0.9415.1
Overpass729%0.8114.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
678msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.77HE damage / grenade
8.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7272% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0511%18 Sept
dust213–4-0.0018%10 Sept
cache13–110.0930%10 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0714%9 Sept
cache16–12-0.0227%7 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0125%2 Sept
anubis16–140.0321%1 Sept
dust210–13-0.0718%31 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0131%31 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0423%30 Jul
inferno13–80.1031%30 Jul
cache13–100.0023%27 Jul
ancient10–130.0421%26 Jul
mirage13–50.1416%26 Jul
anubis13–50.0621%20 Jul
cache11–130.0511%19 Jul
dust213–110.0238%18 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0320%30 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0611%30 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0211%27 May
mirage9–13-0.0125%23 May
nuke15–15-0.0512%23 May
anubis13–90.0021%15 May
cache13–80.0821%14 May
inferno4–130.0222%21 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0825%9 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0110%4 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0220%24 Jan
dust215–150.0125%23 Jan
overpass13–9-0.0521%23 Jan
dust210–13-0.0524%22 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0124%21 Jan
dust28–13-0.0323%10 Jan
mirage13–60.0018%10 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0621%9 Jan
dust26–13-0.0413%8 Jan
train1–13-0.0432%8 Jan
mirage16–140.0819%8 Jan
dust27–130.0526%8 Jan
inferno15–15-0.037%7 Jan
dust27–13-0.0216%7 Jan
overpass15–15-0.0022%7 Jan
ancient16–14-0.0218%6 Jan
dust24–13-0.0417%6 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0222%5 Jan
mirage13–70.0420%4 Jan
inferno14–16-0.0620%3 Jan
overpass13–80.0424%25 Dec
nuke13–90.1118%5 Dec
jura13–90.1031%1 Aug
dust213–8-0.0116%1 Aug
overpass13–7-0.0215%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0123%22 Jul
vertigo5–9-0.0225%21 Jul
inferno13–40.0032%19 Jul
mirage9–130.0114%18 Jul
mirage5–10.1624%18 Jul
inferno10–130.0826%13 Jul
vertigo10–130.0134%9 Jul
dust213–100.0410%8 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0226%2 Jun
train13–80.0146%30 May
anubis13–50.0611%29 May
ancient7–13-0.0617%28 May
overpass13–40.0721%28 May
ancient4–13-0.098%18 May
mirage13–16-0.0423%17 May
anubis11–13-0.0416%12 May
grail13–6-0.0411%10 May
train5–13-0.0726%1 May
anubis13–11-0.0219%1 May
mirage11–13-0.0019%16 Apr
ancient4–13-0.019%15 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0022%15 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0131%10 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0118%6 Apr
mirage2–9-0.0317%22 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0223%21 Mar
nuke10–130.0621%7 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0710%7 Mar
dust26–13-0.0217%6 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0510%3 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0120%2 Mar
ancient7–130.0023%2 Mar
train14–16-0.0116%2 Mar
ancient13–50.0230%2 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0426%22 Feb
nuke8–130.0410%9 Feb
train13–9-0.0317%9 Feb
ancient13–40.0622%8 Feb
ancient13–100.0216%8 Feb
mirage13–80.0823%6 Feb
inferno13–70.0116%4 Feb
mirage11–130.0526%4 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0318%24 Jan
ancient13–70.1430%12 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0415%12 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0030%19 Dec
ancient13–7-0.0219%19 Dec
anubis13–11-0.0724%19 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →