teräsbörje

teräsbörje — CS2 Stats

FI76561198242520802[U:1:282255074]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

360Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 16 Mar 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,600 +2,097 25 Feb4 Jun · 12 days played
9,50312,370peak 12,37025 Feb4 Jun
12,549Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2025-03-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGteräsbörjeFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning33
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40555Last 10040%Win rateWWWLTLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −6.6pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 766ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 722ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 687ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim3.1
Utility3.8
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 678ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning3.3
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time680ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 680ms
Headshot accuracy20.8%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 10 May
45%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · ancient, 6 Apr
477msFastest reaction time · 6–4 · inferno, 3 May
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 8 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2271532%-0.06
infernoC1981142%-0.03
dust2D1541127%-0.04
nukeC145936%-0.06
ancientB105550%-0.02
cacheS64267%-0.05
overpassS64267%-0.03
vertigo31233%-0.02
poseidon110100%-0.02
anubis1010%-0.01
italy1010%-0.08
office1010%-0.08
basalt110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

250Matches
48%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
50.1ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage650%0.7110.8
Dust220%0.488.5
Ancient20%0.295.5
Inferno10%0.233.0
Anubis10%0.8214.0
Nuke10%0.132.0
Cache1100%0.9110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
22.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
24.2%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
678msReaction time
16.2%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
8.38HE damage / grenade
4.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1719° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.096%8 Sept
nuke13–3-0.064%8 Sept
cache16–14-0.0117%7 Sept
inferno6–13-0.067%7 Sept
dust212–12-0.0914%4 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0733%4 Sept
cache7–13-0.0528%24 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0110%10 Aug
ancient8–130.0125%3 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0220%3 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0721%4 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0221%4 Jun
cache13–8-0.0814%14 May
poseidon9–6-0.0225%10 May
inferno13–10.0822%10 May
dust212–16-0.0521%10 May
nuke11–13-0.0420%10 May
cache13–4-0.0217%9 May
cache8–13-0.0827%5 May
cache13–2-0.0542%5 May
inferno13–4-0.0629%25 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0513%25 Apr
dust29–13-0.069%6 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0931%6 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0342%6 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0245%6 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0316%3 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0920%1 Apr
mirage13–10-0.108%1 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0924%1 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0319%28 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0114%27 Mar
inferno3–130.0423%27 Mar
dust216–13-0.0522%25 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0312%25 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0427%25 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0913%24 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0618%23 Mar
dust29–13-0.0729%23 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0316%23 Mar
mirage13–80.0011%23 Mar
nuke9–13-0.1037%23 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0021%13 Mar
nuke3–13-0.1136%25 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0817%25 Feb
ancient8–130.0114%23 Feb
ancient13–90.0229%22 Feb
dust22–13-0.0418%22 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0816%22 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0213%22 Feb
mirage10–13-0.1012%21 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0517%20 Feb
inferno6–13-0.1020%20 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0631%20 Feb
dust213–20.0418%19 Feb
mirage13–7-0.095%19 Feb
italy9–13-0.0813%19 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0318%17 Feb
dust215–15-0.0113%17 Feb
nuke8–13-0.1013%16 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0218%25 Jan
mirage2–13-0.1113%25 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0614%24 Jan
dust213–6-0.0219%23 Jan
office12–12-0.0812%23 Jan
dust212–12-0.0720%20 Jan
inferno13–00.0522%8 Jan
dust29–13-0.0526%5 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0514%5 Jan
overpass13–110.0516%10 Dec
inferno12–16-0.088%9 Dec
dust212–12-0.0431%1 Dec
inferno13–9-0.0614%26 Nov
nuke2–13-0.1018%26 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0633%26 Nov
dust211–13-0.0419%26 Nov
mirage3–13-0.1115%23 Nov
inferno6–13-0.0623%23 Nov
inferno4–13-0.0513%21 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0613%21 Nov
dust26–13-0.0537%21 Nov
mirage4–13-0.0611%21 Nov
inferno4–13-0.0941%21 Nov
mirage13–7-0.0420%23 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0821%23 Sept
dust213–7-0.0017%18 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0811%18 Sept
ancient13–60.0023%28 May
nuke9–70.0517%3 May
vertigo9–7-0.0435%3 May
inferno9–5-0.0419%3 May
inferno6–4-0.0110%3 May
inferno13–50.0527%27 Apr
vertigo2–130.0128%4 Apr
basalt13–10-0.0512%2 Apr
mirage13–8-0.028%1 Apr
vertigo2–13-0.0318%1 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0222%29 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0120%29 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0516%16 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →