Tep1sk@

Tep1sk@ — CS2 Stats

76561198296633306[U:1:336367578]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,942Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,495Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#81196 of 222832 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,926 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,495 → 19,495
0Faceit ELO · 1,926 → 1,926
+4Tracked matches · now 1,942
0.0ppWin rate · 60.7% → 60.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 24 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,495 -2,021 24 Apr15 Sept · 28 days played
16,77921,768peak 21,76824 Apr15 Sept
21,768Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,926Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-04-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,926
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 75 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,273 below peak (21,768)
  • +2,608 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,225 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 505 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTep1sk@FACEITLevel 6 · 1,926 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,495 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,926csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning59
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46504Last 10046%Win rateLLWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.6
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.9
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time543ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−5.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 15 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 10–5 · ancient, 4 May
375msFastest reaction time · 5–0 · inferno, 15 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 19 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 10infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28121643%-0.01
cacheC1661038%-0.00
dust2C1661038%-0.01
nukeB147750%-0.01
infernoD124833%-0.01
ancientS108280%-0.01
anubis32167%0.02
train110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

892Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
70.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15947%0.8413.3
Ancient8349%0.9314.0
Nuke7953%0.9213.2
Anubis6452%0.9414.4
Dust25639%0.8714.1
Train5569%0.9914.8
Inferno4443%0.9113.6
Cache2654%0.7713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
538msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.04HE damage / grenade
9.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.9906% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.742% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–9-0.0417%17 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0121%15 Sept
cache13–40.1512%15 Sept
mirage13–80.0113%15 Sept
inferno5–00.0510%15 Sept
cache13–80.0318%9 Sept
ancient13–70.0825%8 Sept
nuke13–30.1113%8 Sept
dust213–70.0219%8 Sept
cache11–13-0.0022%8 Sept
dust29–130.0316%8 Sept
dust25–13-0.0327%6 Sept
dust213–70.0418%5 Sept
nuke13–100.036%4 Sept
mirage13–10.1121%4 Sept
inferno15–150.0110%4 Sept
nuke13–20.009%4 Sept
mirage8–130.0611%4 Sept
dust215–150.0211%4 Sept
ancient13–10-0.069%4 Sept
mirage11–130.0411%1 Sept
cache7–13-0.0811%1 Sept
dust213–11-0.0115%1 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0221%31 Aug
nuke8–6-0.0313%27 Aug
mirage10–130.0312%27 Aug
mirage13–70.018%26 Aug
cache16–14-0.0215%26 Aug
dust214–16-0.049%26 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0315%25 Aug
mirage13–10-0.035%25 Aug
cache6–13-0.0215%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0013%25 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0413%24 Aug
cache7–130.0122%24 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0510%24 Aug
mirage13–80.019%24 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0922%23 Aug
nuke7–13-0.049%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0416%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0334%22 Aug
mirage9–130.0112%22 Aug
ancient10–50.048%22 Aug
inferno13–80.0132%21 Aug
mirage10–6-0.0117%21 Aug
anubis13–110.0515%21 Aug
dust213–100.0320%21 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0220%11 Aug
cache13–60.0125%11 Aug
cache6–130.0120%11 Aug
mirage1–130.0120%11 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0133%11 Aug
mirage13–60.0121%11 Aug
cache9–13-0.0625%6 Aug
cache4–13-0.0119%6 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0611%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0119%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0818%26 Jul
mirage3–10-0.0619%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0613%17 Jul
dust23–13-0.0320%17 Jul
anubis13–30.049%14 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0710%13 Jul
ancient16–12-0.076%13 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0319%7 Jul
cache4–13-0.0619%7 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0013%6 Jul
inferno15–15-0.056%6 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0226%6 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0614%22 Jun
train13–6-0.0533%14 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0424%14 Jun
cache13–8-0.0623%14 Jun
dust24–13-0.026%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.0326%28 May
ancient10–13-0.058%28 May
mirage13–7-0.029%28 May
inferno13–100.0225%22 May
dust210–13-0.0311%21 May
mirage10–130.0033%19 May
nuke13–00.0512%19 May
nuke7–130.0125%17 May
dust213–9-0.0416%17 May
dust213–100.0226%17 May
ancient13–60.0514%14 May
cache7–130.0517%13 May
ancient16–130.0016%11 May
inferno13–10.0819%10 May
dust212–160.0317%10 May
nuke11–13-0.0125%10 May
nuke7–13-0.0424%9 May
mirage13–60.0123%9 May
ancient3–11-0.0525%8 May
anubis10–13-0.0315%8 May
inferno9–13-0.0918%8 May
mirage10–13-0.0214%4 May
ancient10–5-0.0440%4 May
mirage10–13-0.0410%4 May
cache13–60.0116%4 May
mirage6–13-0.0230%24 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →