Rastafarian Alien

Rastafarian Alien — CS2 Stats

BL76561198229770544[U:1:269504816]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,268Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,334Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,304 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (49 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,304 → 1,304
+1Tracked matches · now 1,268
0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,842 -126 10 Jun – 5 Jul · 15 days played
15,31518,533peak 18,53310 Jun5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,304 +0 31 Aug – 26 Sept · 5 observations
1,3041,304peak 1,30431 Aug26 Sept
18,841Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,304Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-06-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,304
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 47 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate55.7%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy4.5%12.0%12.4%7.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.021.03above
Match win rate41.3%44.7%45.2%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRastafarian AlienFACEITLevel 5 · 1,304 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,304csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning35
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLLLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.5
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning3.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time624ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 29 Jun →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · nuke, 18 Jun →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · office, 25 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D248–1633%-0.00
nukeB147–750%-0.02
infernoS139–469%-0.00
mirageD103–730%-0.04
ancientD93–633%-0.01
anubisS86–275%0.00
cacheC73–443%-0.00
overpassS75–271%0.00
office—41–325%-0.06
vertigo—22–0100%-0.03
italy—11–0100%0.03
train—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,573Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
3,625Matches
41.3%Match win rate
55.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
4.5%Shot accuracy
6,258MVPs
1,334Hours (in match)
3,166Bombs planted
709Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,884
AWP4,851
MP91,696
FAMAS1,621
MAC-101,519
MP71,497

Lifetime map wins

4,502inferno
4,497dust2
3,077nuke
2,198vertigo
843office
707train
244italy
89ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

272Matches
51%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
70.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6943%0.8612.3
Dust24652%0.9013.0
Inferno3863%0.8511.6
Anubis2846%0.9315.8
Overpass2564%0.7712.7
Vertigo2148%0.9013.3
Ancient2138%0.7912.1
Nuke1362%0.9314.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
616msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
32.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
10.84HE damage / grenade
10.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4891 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5566% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.0611%18 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0217%18 Aug →
dust28–13-0.075%18 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0419%15 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.0018%13 Aug →
cache10–13-0.029%8 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0412%8 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0114%6 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0423%3 Aug →
dust213–10.0725%29 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0222%29 Jul →
dust27–13-0.028%29 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0026%27 Jul →
dust213–40.1321%26 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0820%26 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0120%19 Jul →
dust211–130.0518%19 Jul →
overpass13–50.0014%19 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0125%17 Jul →
nuke13–100.0217%16 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0433%16 Jul →
italy13–30.0332%15 Jul →
office13–10-0.0922%15 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0511%15 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.107%15 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0733%15 Jul →
train13–110.0932%15 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0236%13 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0324%13 Jul →
office10–13-0.0721%11 Jul →
vertigo13–8-0.0333%11 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0334%10 Jul →
nuke13–70.0916%10 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0514%10 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0118%9 Jul →
overpass13–70.008%8 Jul →
cache13–100.0619%7 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0811%5 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0513%5 Jul →
dust26–13-0.039%4 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0111%4 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0428%2 Jul →
ancient13–90.0422%2 Jul →
cache6–13-0.048%2 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0914%1 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0247%29 Jun →
anubis13–50.1017%29 Jun →
dust23–130.0214%29 Jun →
inferno9–50.1429%29 Jun →
dust24–130.0011%29 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0315%28 Jun →
anubis13–50.0112%28 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0225%28 Jun →
dust29–130.0020%28 Jun →
ancient13–50.1024%28 Jun →
anubis13–7-0.026%28 Jun →
nuke1–13-0.109%28 Jun →
dust211–130.0830%28 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0614%26 Jun →
cache12–120.0615%25 Jun →
office8–130.0317%25 Jun →
inferno7–130.0220%25 Jun →
inferno13–10.0912%25 Jun →
office7–13-0.1022%25 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0111%25 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0521%23 Jun →
nuke13–20.0318%23 Jun →
vertigo13–11-0.0319%21 Jun →
nuke13–160.0023%18 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0422%18 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0655%18 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0218%17 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0113%17 Jun →
overpass13–60.0112%17 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0221%17 Jun →
anubis13–80.0215%17 Jun →
dust215–15-0.086%17 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0633%16 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0623%16 Jun →
inferno13–80.0116%16 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0338%16 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0110%15 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0416%15 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0123%15 Jun →
dust28–13-0.088%14 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.0522%14 Jun →
anubis13–7-0.0315%14 Jun →
dust213–110.0119%14 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.037%14 Jun →
dust213–60.0526%12 Jun →
inferno13–50.0129%12 Jun →
mirage13–90.0022%12 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0221%12 Jun →
dust213–100.0217%12 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0518%11 Jun →
dust213–110.0213%11 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0515%11 Jun →
anubis13–70.0716%11 Jun →
overpass9–130.0818%11 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0814%10 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.