-𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐬𝐮 — CS2 Stats

76561198219703751[U:1:259438023]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,910Tracked matches27%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player

Premier CS Rating22,267Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#53108 of 260004 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,267 -1,405 23 Sept – 18 Oct · 14 days played

24,516Peak Premier in tracked matches

22Days played since 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

1,405 below peak (23,672)
-1,405 over 30 days · declining
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,733 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim97

Positioning76

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD27–68–5Last 10027%Win rateWWLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −5.8pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 35%
Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 31%
Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

6–14 · 30% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 34%
Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim9.7

Utility5.5

Positioning7.6

Opening Duels5.5

Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7

Positioning7.6

Utility5.5

Mechanics9.2

Opening Duels6.1

Win Impact0.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.09 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time533ms−26ms

first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms

Headshot accuracy34.3%−2.7%

first ⅓ avg 37.0% → last ⅓ avg 34.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 16 Sept →

58%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 4 Oct →

336msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 24 Sept →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

W2Current streak

4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 30% over 33anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	D	33	10–23	30%	0.08
inferno	D	29	8–21	28%	0.06
cache	D	14	4–10	29%	0.04
anubis	D	8	0–8	0%	0.01
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	0.08
dust2	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,825Matches

49%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

48.7ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	36	47%	1.42	18.8
Ancient	17	29%	1.04	16.0
Anubis	16	31%	1.21	14.9
Vertigo	13	38%	1.27	15.9
Inferno	11	55%	1.31	18.2
Overpass	7	43%	1.27	23.0
Nuke	6	67%	0.91	13.7
Dust2	1	0%	0.47	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.8%Headshot accuracy

39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.5%Spray accuracy

91.2%Counter-strafing

7.7°Preaim

532msReaction time

51.8%T opening success

57.1%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

5.3%Flash assists

11.81HE damage / grenade

9.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–5	0.06	39%	18 Oct →
cache	13–8	-0.06	41%	18 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	30%	11 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.00	26%	11 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.06	37%	11 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	26%	11 Oct →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	41%	10 Oct →
anubis	3–13	-0.07	18%	10 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.07	31%	9 Oct →
anubis	1–13	-0.02	25%	7 Oct →
cache	8–13	0.10	42%	7 Oct →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	25%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.11	27%	5 Oct →
ancient	11–13	0.18	29%	4 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.11	30%	4 Oct →
cache	1–13	0.01	58%	4 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.01	47%	4 Oct →
mirage	13–2	0.05	38%	4 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	26%	4 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	50%	30 Sept →
ancient	4–13	0.04	56%	30 Sept →
dust2	16–13	0.02	22%	30 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.09	38%	30 Sept →
anubis	14–16	0.15	34%	29 Sept →
ancient	6–13	0.08	38%	29 Sept →
dust2	2–13	0.04	38%	29 Sept →
mirage	6–13	0.09	26%	29 Sept →
ancient	6–13	0.05	30%	28 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.02	29%	28 Sept →
inferno	13–10	0.17	31%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.03	42%	28 Sept →
inferno	5–13	0.03	25%	27 Sept →
cache	15–15	0.10	36%	27 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.16	32%	27 Sept →
nuke	9–13	0.12	20%	25 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.04	41%	25 Sept →
dust2	14–16	0.04	29%	25 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.03	30%	24 Sept →
mirage	1–13	-0.01	33%	24 Sept →
cache	4–13	0.02	27%	24 Sept →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	31%	24 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.03	37%	24 Sept →
dust2	3–13	0.04	36%	24 Sept →
cache	15–15	0.08	33%	24 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	22%	24 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	42%	24 Sept →
dust2	13–2	0.03	56%	24 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.09	39%	24 Sept →
inferno	13–6	0.00	30%	24 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.05	21%	23 Sept →
mirage	2–13	0.00	31%	23 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.04	40%	23 Sept →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	20%	23 Sept →
inferno	1–13	0.07	36%	23 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.13	49%	23 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.11	38%	23 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.08	25%	23 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.05	36%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.01	33%	23 Sept →
ancient	6–13	0.06	48%	22 Sept →
anubis	5–13	0.05	25%	22 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.01	54%	22 Sept →
mirage	3–13	0.06	30%	22 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.10	34%	22 Sept →
mirage	14–16	0.10	43%	21 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.17	42%	21 Sept →
cache	12–16	0.07	51%	21 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.03	35%	21 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.08	34%	21 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.09	44%	21 Sept →
anubis	4–13	0.02	24%	20 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	48%	20 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.07	47%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	27%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.14	24%	19 Sept →
inferno	4–13	0.03	33%	19 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.12	41%	19 Sept →
inferno	3–13	0.11	49%	19 Sept →
cache	12–16	0.10	43%	19 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.14	38%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.10	41%	19 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.05	43%	19 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.06	27%	19 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.13	47%	18 Sept →
inferno	5–13	0.01	38%	18 Sept →
mirage	15–15	0.13	37%	18 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.07	32%	18 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.12	28%	18 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.21	38%	18 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.07	27%	18 Sept →
cache	0–8	-0.08	19%	17 Sept →
cache	4–13	0.03	42%	16 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.18	48%	16 Sept →
mirage	6–1	0.10	30%	16 Sept →
inferno	9–13	0.17	38%	16 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.08	47%	16 Sept →
mirage	13–1	0.24	46%	16 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.14	20%	14 Sept →
mirage	3–13	0.08	43%	14 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.12	44%	14 Sept →