SalamiChomper69

SalamiChomper69 — CS2 Stats

AF76561198218212365[U:1:257946637]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,452Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,846Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4158 of 19636 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,846Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,846
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,154 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSalamiChomper69FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER23,846 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning52
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateWWWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.8
Aggression8.5
Utility2.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch7.4

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.2
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time627ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy27.8%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–3
130Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 22ancientWeakest map · 0% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A33191458%0.01
mirageA2214864%-0.00
nukeA1810856%-0.02
ancientD100100%-0.03
anubisC83538%-0.02
cacheB63350%-0.00
inferno31233%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches
58%Win rate
1.41Avg K/D
98.1ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

57%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno367%1.3721.7
Mirage333%1.0915.7
Nuke367%2.0822.3
Dust21100%1.8129.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.2%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
628msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
1.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4052 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2708% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0248%27 Aug
dust213–100.0430%27 Aug
dust213–40.1529%27 Aug
inferno9–130.0332%27 Aug
anubis4–30.0215%26 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0325%26 Aug
mirage16–140.0123%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0029%26 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0018%26 Aug
anubis8–130.0323%26 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0126%26 Aug
dust213–20.0738%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0622%25 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0629%25 Aug
dust213–1-0.0425%25 Aug
dust214–16-0.0218%25 Aug
cache6–13-0.0529%25 Aug
ancient8–130.0133%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0131%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0718%25 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0433%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0032%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0122%24 Aug
dust215–150.0216%24 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0433%24 Aug
dust213–70.0350%24 Aug
mirage13–70.0044%24 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0331%24 Aug
dust28–130.0422%24 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0126%24 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0222%24 Aug
dust213–110.0724%24 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0421%20 Aug
cache8–13-0.0328%20 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0428%20 Aug
dust213–11-0.0238%20 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0230%20 Aug
anubis15–150.0224%20 Aug
cache10–130.0546%20 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0217%19 Aug
dust21–4-0.0250%19 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0310%17 Aug
nuke13–110.0229%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0118%17 Aug
mirage13–90.0125%17 Aug
dust216–120.0115%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0517%17 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0018%17 Aug
dust213–9-0.0617%13 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0121%13 Aug
nuke13–50.1025%13 Aug
dust213–90.0429%13 Aug
dust213–70.0422%13 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0220%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0621%12 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0728%12 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0522%12 Aug
dust213–60.0623%12 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0126%11 Aug
cache13–70.0731%11 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0122%11 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0121%10 Aug
dust26–13-0.0630%10 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0330%10 Aug
dust213–7-0.0422%10 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0525%10 Aug
dust27–13-0.0332%10 Aug
anubis10–130.0016%9 Aug
mirage2–80.0525%9 Aug
dust210–130.0029%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0814%9 Aug
dust213–80.0419%9 Aug
dust213–100.0724%9 Aug
mirage13–60.1127%9 Aug
mirage12–120.0922%9 Aug
dust213–70.1237%8 Aug
nuke1–13-0.079%7 Aug
mirage13–10.0528%5 Aug
dust213–110.0412%4 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0426%4 Aug
nuke13–90.0126%4 Aug
mirage6–2-0.0236%4 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0125%4 Aug
cache13–10-0.0432%4 Aug
dust213–30.1940%4 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0728%4 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0413%4 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0915%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0811%3 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0327%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0418%3 Aug
nuke13–00.0832%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0218%3 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0921%3 Aug
dust22–13-0.0718%3 Aug
dust213–10.0617%3 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0220%3 Aug
cache13–8-0.0120%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0628%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0621%3 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →