low cortisol unc — CS2 Stats

76561198217300129[U:1:257034401]

1,842Tracked matches78%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning68

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61–29–10Last 10061%Win rateWWTWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression6.9

Utility6.2

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning6.8

Utility6.2

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time517ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%−4.6%

first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 12–12

13–1Biggest win — nuke

9Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 48% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	33	20–13	61%	0.06
mirage	B	25	12–13	48%	0.04
dust2	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
cache	S	8	6–2	75%	0.06
inferno	S	7	6–1	86%	0.03
train	—	4	4–0	100%	0.09
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
stronghold	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

766Matches

55%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

85.8ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	51	49%	1.20	17.8
Dust2	27	41%	1.16	18.3
Ancient	22	55%	1.09	17.5
Nuke	19	68%	1.54	20.3
Inferno	14	64%	1.26	17.2
Anubis	7	43%	1.21	18.0
Overpass	4	50%	1.15	20.3
Train	3	67%	1.36	14.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy

38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.4%Spray accuracy

82.7%Counter-strafing

9.7°Preaim

512msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

55.1%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

9.6%Flash assists

9.70HE damage / grenade

12.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.907% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	-0.05	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.02	19%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.11	21%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.10	11%	5 Aug →
nuke	7–1	0.04	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	25%	5 Aug →
boulder	13–7	0.09	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.10	31%	18 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	0.11	22%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.10	14%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	36%	25 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.03	15%	25 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.13	12%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.12	24%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.08	23%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.11	16%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.01	29%	21 Jun →
stronghold	9–13	-0.04	31%	17 Jun →
office	13–2	0.06	24%	17 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	13%	15 Jun →
nuke	1–13	-0.04	12%	15 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	0%	15 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.06	23%	12 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.01	21%	12 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.08	10%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.00	30%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.05	30%	10 Jun →
vertigo	7–13	0.02	12%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–1	0.20	47%	10 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.05	19%	6 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.07	24%	6 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.01	5%	6 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	20%	6 Jun →
nuke	12–12	0.10	18%	6 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.03	11%	6 Jun →
nuke	1–13	-0.03	24%	6 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	24%	6 Jun →
train	13–10	0.07	28%	1 Jun →
inferno	1–13	-0.00	26%	1 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.00	12%	1 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.05	18%	1 Jun →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	27%	1 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.12	20%	1 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.00	43%	1 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.05	16%	30 May →
mirage	13–7	0.14	18%	30 May →
nuke	13–10	0.03	32%	30 May →
mirage	13–11	0.08	18%	30 May →
dust2	13–11	0.10	17%	30 May →
inferno	13–10	0.02	24%	28 May →
mirage	13–5	0.07	15%	28 May →
nuke	13–2	0.11	15%	28 May →
dust2	13–4	0.06	24%	28 May →
poseidon	7–9	0.08	20%	28 May →
inferno	13–11	0.01	20%	26 May →
nuke	13–8	0.07	15%	26 May →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	17%	26 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	20%	26 May →
nuke	10–13	0.01	25%	25 May →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	12%	25 May →
inferno	11–2	0.02	18%	25 May →
inferno	13–7	0.07	20%	25 May →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	16%	25 May →
mirage	13–7	0.02	30%	25 May →
train	13–4	0.15	23%	22 May →
nuke	12–12	0.14	27%	22 May →
inferno	13–4	0.07	30%	22 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	26%	22 May →
cache	13–8	0.07	29%	21 May →
nuke	12–12	0.21	25%	21 May →
mirage	12–12	0.03	22%	21 May →
train	13–10	0.08	19%	21 May →
ancient	6–13	0.05	24%	21 May →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	17%	21 May →
nuke	9–13	0.06	22%	19 May →
train	13–1	0.05	20%	18 May →
ancient	13–5	0.07	13%	18 May →
inferno	13–10	0.03	14%	18 May →
dust2	9–13	0.04	28%	18 May →
nuke	13–5	0.01	28%	18 May →
nuke	13–11	0.07	27%	18 May →
mirage	13–6	0.19	15%	18 May →
anubis	13–8	0.03	18%	16 May →
mirage	13–11	0.05	24%	16 May →
nuke	13–5	0.04	24%	16 May →
nuke	10–13	0.08	25%	15 May →
mirage	12–12	0.02	20%	15 May →
dust2	8–13	0.00	35%	13 May →
nuke	3–13	-0.05	13%	13 May →
nuke	13–10	0.06	28%	12 May →
cache	13–9	0.01	20%	12 May →
nuke	13–2	0.14	19%	12 May →
cache	13–11	0.16	30%	9 May →
mirage	13–8	0.09	24%	9 May →
cache	0–2	0.08	100%	9 May →
dust2	6–13	0.03	16%	6 May →
cache	2–13	0.08	33%	6 May →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	26%	28 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	16%	28 Apr →