jimi

jimi — CS2 Stats

76561198214505483[U:1:254239755]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,025Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,860 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (35 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,025 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

1,860Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-05-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,860
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 141 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjimiFACEITLevel 10 · 1,860 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,860csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning50
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLWLLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −0ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.0
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time608ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 11 May →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 20 Jun →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · dust2, 18 May →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 12 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3116–1552%0.01
ancientB2513–1252%-0.01
dust2A2213–959%0.01
anubisC94–544%-0.02
infernoS86–275%0.01
cache—31–233%-0.03
nuke—10–10%-0.09
overpass—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

986Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
73.8ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17956%1.1115.3
Dust210451%0.9414.3
Ancient8348%0.9914.8
Inferno4349%1.0215.5
Overpass3152%0.9416.6
Anubis2843%0.9414.8
Nuke1040%0.8414.1
Cache650%0.7813.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
71.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
604msReaction time
25.1%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
7.25HE damage / grenade
19.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.0901% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0112%20 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0321%16 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0120%16 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0519%16 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0012%15 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.059%15 Jul →
dust27–13-0.049%15 Jul →
dust216–140.0116%15 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0218%15 Jul →
dust213–30.0426%15 Jul →
ancient13–60.0725%15 Jul →
ancient13–20.0717%10 Jul →
dust213–110.0422%10 Jul →
mirage13–70.067%9 Jul →
mirage3–10-0.0316%9 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0126%7 Jul →
anubis13–110.0317%6 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0120%6 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0624%6 Jul →
dust213–90.0322%6 Jul →
anubis16–19-0.0319%6 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0618%4 Jul →
ancient13–60.0818%3 Jul →
mirage14–160.0418%3 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0327%3 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0132%3 Jul →
mirage13–80.0116%3 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0414%28 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0525%28 Jun →
anubis13–110.0116%28 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0130%28 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0117%26 Jun →
dust210–130.1021%25 Jun →
anubis17–19-0.0418%25 Jun →
anubis13–90.0115%25 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0122%24 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0627%23 Jun →
dust213–50.0019%23 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0914%23 Jun →
inferno9–130.0219%23 Jun →
mirage13–40.0246%20 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0637%20 Jun →
mirage13–30.1029%20 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0314%20 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0610%18 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0423%18 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0131%17 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0131%17 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0131%16 Jun →
inferno13–90.0019%5 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0226%3 Jun →
mirage13–90.0922%3 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0113%29 May →
inferno13–90.0030%29 May →
cache5–13-0.0525%28 May →
mirage5–13-0.0030%28 May →
mirage6–13-0.0521%28 May →
dust28–130.0429%28 May →
overpass13–11-0.0320%27 May →
mirage13–80.0937%27 May →
mirage16–130.0223%27 May →
ancient13–70.0019%26 May →
ancient14–16-0.0027%26 May →
inferno10–13-0.0323%26 May →
ancient5–130.0234%26 May →
inferno13–110.0528%25 May →
anubis5–13-0.0624%25 May →
dust213–70.0325%25 May →
mirage13–30.0924%23 May →
ancient19–160.0528%23 May →
dust23–13-0.0421%23 May →
ancient6–13-0.1220%22 May →
ancient10–13-0.0131%21 May →
ancient16–14-0.0331%19 May →
dust27–130.0422%19 May →
inferno13–50.0725%18 May →
dust213–20.0019%18 May →
dust213–70.0119%18 May →
ancient13–110.0424%17 May →
dust213–100.0521%17 May →
ancient7–13-0.0225%13 May →
mirage13–60.0313%13 May →
mirage9–13-0.0415%13 May →
anubis13–9-0.0118%12 May →
mirage13–40.059%12 May →
mirage6–13-0.0219%12 May →
mirage13–00.0019%12 May →
dust217–19-0.0121%12 May →
ancient10–13-0.0415%11 May →
mirage13–90.1316%11 May →
cache5–13-0.0614%11 May →
ancient9–130.0128%11 May →
ancient11–13-0.0222%11 May →
inferno13–11-0.0315%9 May →
mirage13–10-0.0115%8 May →
dust213–90.0017%7 May →
cache13–90.0122%7 May →
ancient13–8-0.0210%7 May →
inferno13–9-0.0226%7 May →
ancient13–60.0422%7 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.