Zdynt — CS2 Stats

76561198214376208[U:1:254110480]

917Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,415Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3268 of 17474 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZdyntFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,415 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning53
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58384Last 10058%Win rateLWWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.8
Utility5.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time617ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–8
131Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 7nukeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28141450%-0.00
mirageA27151256%0.00
ancientA127558%-0.02
anubisA127558%0.01
nukeC73443%0.01
overpassS770100%-0.01
infernoS64267%0.01
cache110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,200Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
75.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5947%0.9915.6
Anubis2148%1.1316.2
Ancient2055%0.9216.1
Dust22065%1.0016.4
Overpass1741%0.7914.1
Nuke1346%1.0416.0
Vertigo1040%0.7511.6
Inferno757%1.2017.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.6%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
615msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
10.15HE damage / grenade
9.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3107% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0240%2 Jul
dust216–140.0633%1 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0317%1 Jul
cache13–110.0537%1 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0330%30 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0121%30 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0211%27 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0122%25 Jun
anubis13–80.0227%25 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0523%21 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0119%21 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0220%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0426%20 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0133%20 Jun
anubis13–20.0715%14 Jun
anubis7–130.0024%14 Jun
dust25–13-0.0227%11 Jun
mirage13–60.0724%11 Jun
anubis13–50.0527%11 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0218%11 Jun
dust213–80.0720%11 Jun
anubis13–9-0.018%10 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0222%10 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0219%10 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0026%10 Jun
dust26–13-0.0617%10 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0918%8 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0232%8 Jun
anubis13–60.1049%7 Jun
ancient16–130.0423%7 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0334%7 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0039%7 Jun
nuke13–110.0618%7 Jun
nuke6–130.0138%29 May
inferno11–130.0333%29 May
ancient9–13-0.0253%29 May
overpass13–5-0.0522%29 May
inferno16–140.0530%28 May
dust23–13-0.1125%28 May
mirage11–130.0929%28 May
overpass16–130.0224%28 May
dust213–110.0332%28 May
dust213–10.0022%28 May
overpass13–5-0.0719%28 May
mirage11–130.0137%27 May
nuke13–6-0.0025%27 May
mirage13–40.0019%27 May
dust26–13-0.0224%27 May
mirage16–13-0.0113%27 May
dust213–70.0626%27 May
dust213–70.0225%27 May
dust20–13-0.1250%27 May
dust213–60.0220%27 May
dust215–150.0314%26 May
dust29–130.0314%25 May
mirage7–00.0127%25 May
nuke13–40.0244%25 May
mirage0–3-0.0650%25 May
anubis16–14-0.0322%25 May
mirage13–60.0029%25 May
dust213–5-0.0025%25 May
mirage9–13-0.0519%25 May
nuke7–13-0.0521%21 May
mirage1–13-0.1024%21 May
dust29–13-0.0921%21 May
mirage13–80.1430%20 May
dust215–15-0.0123%20 May
inferno13–9-0.0524%20 May
nuke6–13-0.0029%20 May
ancient13–20.0829%20 May
overpass13–8-0.0126%19 May
mirage13–11-0.0321%19 May
inferno13–8-0.0252%19 May
dust213–70.0222%19 May
ancient10–13-0.0425%19 May
inferno13–16-0.0028%15 May
dust213–20.1332%14 May
mirage15–15-0.0025%14 May
mirage13–40.0418%14 May
mirage13–20.0230%14 May
dust213–10-0.0228%14 May
anubis15–15-0.0631%14 May
inferno13–80.0619%14 May
dust213–7-0.0256%13 May
mirage9–13-0.0221%11 May
dust27–13-0.0420%8 May
anubis4–13-0.0126%8 May
dust28–13-0.0416%8 May
mirage13–70.0628%8 May
dust211–13-0.0428%8 May
overpass13–6-0.0115%8 May
mirage13–11-0.0018%8 May
dust214–160.0228%8 May
ancient7–8-0.0142%8 May
mirage6–13-0.0118%7 May
overpass13–70.0031%7 May
dust213–60.0447%7 May
overpass13–60.0327%7 May
mirage13–50.0015%7 May
dust213–70.0524%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →