Daggerdon — CS2 Stats

76561198211253703[U:1:250987975]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,134Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,048Hours in CS50Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,888Purple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#22071 of 55876 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,002), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Purple band median	Pink band median	vs Pink band
Headshot rate	50.3%	44.2%	47.1%	above
Shot accuracy	9.0%	11.6%	12.8%	3.8% short
Kill/death ratio	1.05	1.03	1.08	0.04 short
Match win rate	41.5%	45.2%	46.6%	5.2% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning57

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateLLLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression6.8

Utility4.8

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning5.7

Utility4.8

Mechanics9.6

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time560ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms

Headshot accuracy22.3%−2.7%

first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–5

13–3Biggest win — nuke

10Longest win streak

L3Current streak

14–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	A	19	11–8	58%	0.02
dust2	A	18	11–7	61%	0.01
mirage	C	18	7–11	39%	0.01
ancient	A	16	10–6	63%	0.01
nuke	D	12	4–8	33%	0.02
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

62,032Lifetime kills

1.05K/D · Top 50% of Purple band

3,208Matches

41.5%Match win rate

50.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Purple band

9.0%Shot accuracy

7,753MVPs

1,215Hours (in match)

2,417Bombs planted

533Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,407

M4A4 / M4A1-S10,880

Desert Eagle3,411

AWP2,881

P2000 / USP-S2,854

Glock-182,178

AUG1,453

Galil AR1,298

MP91,143

P901,076

Lifetime map wins

4,830dust2

2,460inferno

2,458nuke

1,422train

1,132vertigo

218office

202cbble

130lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

200Matches

59%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

87.1ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	49	71%	1.05	16.4
Dust2	43	60%	1.15	18.5
Ancient	25	52%	1.02	17.8
Nuke	18	56%	1.31	16.2
Cache	17	59%	1.33	17.9
Inferno	11	73%	1.21	19.4
Overpass	11	73%	1.01	16.2
Anubis	8	12%	0.96	17.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy

37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.2%Spray accuracy

93.4%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

559msReaction time

32.4%T opening success

52.8%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

12.3%Flash assists

7.28HE damage / grenade

4.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.3741% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	9–13	0.07	43%	30 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	23%	30 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	13%	30 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.03	20%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	16%	27 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.06	19%	27 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.00	20%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.05	15%	27 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	27%	26 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	17%	26 Aug →
vertigo	3–9	-0.05	11%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	23%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	30%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	23%	25 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.02	21%	25 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	23%	24 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.00	20%	24 Aug →
nuke	2–13	0.01	31%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	18%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	17%	23 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.01	35%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	16%	23 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	26%	23 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.03	24%	23 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.11	29%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	27%	21 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	25%	21 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	22%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	17%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	15%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.04	27%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	23%	18 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	18%	17 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.03	29%	16 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.12	24%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	32%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.07	26%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.12	32%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.05	25%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.09	19%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	28%	14 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.05	13%	14 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	26%	13 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	28%	13 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.00	18%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	18%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	31%	11 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	25%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	16%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.14	27%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	21%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	30%	10 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	15%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.02	26%	7 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.01	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.03	38%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.10	28%	7 Aug →
inferno	2–13	0.02	5%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.04	24%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	29%	6 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	20%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	17%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.03	28%	4 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	25%	4 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	19%	4 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	21%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.00	21%	3 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.05	26%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	28%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	24%	31 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.05	18%	31 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	16%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	28%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.11	25%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	35%	29 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.08	20%	29 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	31%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.05	22%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	18%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.09	34%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	32%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	28%	26 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	25%	24 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	27%	24 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.03	23%	24 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.05	28%	22 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.10	28%	22 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	28%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	29%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	19%	21 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.12	43%	21 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	20%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.08	23%	20 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	29%	20 Jul →