TrueGamer

TrueGamer — CS2 Stats

MT76561198205293208[U:1:245027480]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,242Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,897Top 10% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14261 of 259895 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,050 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,897 +7,375 28 Mar – 29 Oct · 23 days played
18,52226,056peak 26,05628 Mar29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,050 +0 9 Sept – 20 Oct · 5 observations
2,0502,050peak 2,0509 Sept20 Oct
26,056Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,050Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-03-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,050
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 450 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 159 below peak (26,056)
  • -159 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,369 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,103 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrueGamerFACEITLevel 9 · 2,050 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,897 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,050csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning64
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.4
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%+5.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–3 · poseidon, 23 Apr →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 3 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC219–1243%0.00
anubisA1610–663%0.01
nukeB158–753%-0.02
ancientA148–657%0.03
dust2A74–357%0.02
infernoD72–529%0.00
cacheS65–183%0.03
trainD62–433%0.05
poseidon—32–167%0.05
vertigo—31–233%0.04
overpass—21–150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

935Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22451%1.1116.6
Nuke12358%1.1416.9
Ancient9044%1.2216.5
Anubis8845%1.1516.5
Inferno7047%1.1017.0
Overpass3148%1.2217.4
Train3060%1.2617.0
Dust22756%1.0014.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
88.5%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
568msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
16.1%Flash assists
10.42HE damage / grenade
4.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1664% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0020%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0128%1 Nov →
ancient13–70.0127%29 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0524%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0628%28 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0921%28 Oct →
mirage15–150.0424%27 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0315%27 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0438%27 Oct →
dust213–30.1735%27 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0416%25 Oct →
cache13–40.1040%25 Oct →
ancient5–130.0327%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0219%24 Oct →
cache13–80.0324%4 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0120%3 Oct →
cache13–110.0113%4 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0611%26 Aug →
nuke13–50.0012%21 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0731%21 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0418%18 Aug →
dust213–50.0814%18 Aug →
ancient13–00.0917%18 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0025%17 Aug →
anubis17–19-0.0414%7 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.010%7 Aug →
anubis13–50.0631%4 Aug →
anubis13–30.0410%3 Aug →
mirage13–1-0.0143%3 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0143%3 Aug →
mirage13–30.0327%2 Aug →
nuke13–20.0134%2 Aug →
anubis13–80.0422%2 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0120%2 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0513%2 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0219%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0419%30 Jul →
cache13–30.0419%30 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0412%30 Jul →
ancient12–160.1019%29 Jul →
ancient13–80.0223%29 Jul →
mirage13–80.0615%29 Jul →
mirage10–130.0319%22 May →
cache10–130.0112%1 May →
nuke11–130.0022%26 Apr →
poseidon0–9-0.250%23 Apr →
poseidon9–30.2933%23 Apr →
train8–130.0720%23 Apr →
train5–13-0.0827%23 Apr →
anubis13–60.0527%23 Apr →
mirage13–80.0628%23 Apr →
ancient13–40.1523%23 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.089%22 Apr →
poseidon9–60.1232%17 Apr →
mirage13–60.0222%17 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0416%17 Apr →
ancient9–130.0122%17 Apr →
nuke17–190.0020%13 Apr →
nuke13–80.0225%10 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0312%9 Apr →
vertigo5–130.0618%9 Apr →
overpass13–40.0120%9 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0938%6 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0327%3 Apr →
ancient10–130.0524%2 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0036%1 Apr →
ancient13–3-0.0420%1 Apr →
anubis6–130.0019%1 Apr →
anubis13–5-0.0614%1 Apr →
anubis13–60.0320%1 Apr →
inferno16–120.0414%1 Apr →
mirage11–130.0126%1 Apr →
dust213–90.0210%1 Apr →
ancient4–130.0014%1 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0526%31 Mar →
dust211–130.0213%31 Mar →
anubis16–140.0621%31 Mar →
inferno6–130.0118%31 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0813%31 Mar →
train13–40.0519%31 Mar →
mirage13–110.0328%31 Mar →
overpass4–13-0.0814%31 Mar →
dust25–130.028%30 Mar →
vertigo8–13-0.0013%30 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0112%30 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0116%30 Mar →
ancient13–80.0423%30 Mar →
train12–120.0814%30 Mar →
nuke12–12-0.0423%30 Mar →
nuke13–40.0417%29 Mar →
anubis13–90.1517%28 Mar →
train9–130.0730%28 Mar →
vertigo13–70.0614%28 Mar →
ancient13–80.0921%28 Mar →
train13–10.1019%28 Mar →
anubis13–8-0.115%28 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0716%28 Mar →
inferno13–80.0527%28 Mar →
inferno8–8-0.0724%28 Mar →
inferno8–80.0512%28 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.